BACKGROUND: Vaccination is the best way to prevent influenza; however, greater benefits could be achieved. To help guide research and policy agendas, we aimed to quantify the magnitude of influenza disease that would be prevented through targeted increases in vaccine effectiveness (VE) or vaccine coverage (VC). METHODS: For 3 influenza seasons (2011-12, 2015-16, and 2017-18), we used a mathematical model to estimate the number of prevented influenza-associated illnesses, medically attended illnesses, and hospitalizations across 5 age groups. Compared with estimates of prevented illness during each season, given observed VE and VC, we explored the number of additional outcomes that would have been prevented from a 5% absolute increase in VE or VC or from achieving 60% VE or 70% VC. RESULTS: During the 2017-18 season, compared with the burden already prevented by influenza vaccination, a 5% absolute VE increase would have prevented an additional 1 050 000 illnesses and 25 000 hospitalizations (76% among those aged ≥65 years), while achieving 60% VE would have prevented an additional 190 000 hospitalizations. A 5% VC increase would have resulted in 785 000 fewer illnesses (56% among those aged 18-64 years) and 11 000 fewer hospitalizations; reaching 70% would have prevented an additional 39 000 hospitalizations. CONCLUSIONS: Small, attainable improvements in effectiveness or VC of the influenza vaccine could lead to substantial additional reductions in the influenza burden in the United States. Improvements in VE would have the greatest impact in reducing hospitalizations in adults aged ≥65 years, and VC improvements would have the largest benefit in reducing illnesses in adults aged 18-49 years. Published by Oxford University Press for the Infectious Diseases Society of America 2019.
BACKGROUND: Vaccination is the best way to prevent influenza; however, greater benefits could be achieved. To help guide research and policy agendas, we aimed to quantify the magnitude of influenza disease that would be prevented through targeted increases in vaccine effectiveness (VE) or vaccine coverage (VC). METHODS: For 3 influenza seasons (2011-12, 2015-16, and 2017-18), we used a mathematical model to estimate the number of prevented influenza-associated illnesses, medically attended illnesses, and hospitalizations across 5 age groups. Compared with estimates of prevented illness during each season, given observed VE and VC, we explored the number of additional outcomes that would have been prevented from a 5% absolute increase in VE or VC or from achieving 60% VE or 70% VC. RESULTS: During the 2017-18 season, compared with the burden already prevented by influenza vaccination, a 5% absolute VE increase would have prevented an additional 1 050 000 illnesses and 25 000 hospitalizations (76% among those aged ≥65 years), while achieving 60% VE would have prevented an additional 190 000 hospitalizations. A 5% VC increase would have resulted in 785 000 fewer illnesses (56% among those aged 18-64 years) and 11 000 fewer hospitalizations; reaching 70% would have prevented an additional 39 000 hospitalizations. CONCLUSIONS: Small, attainable improvements in effectiveness or VC of the influenza vaccine could lead to substantial additional reductions in the influenza burden in the United States. Improvements in VE would have the greatest impact in reducing hospitalizations in adults aged ≥65 years, and VC improvements would have the largest benefit in reducing illnesses in adults aged 18-49 years. Published by Oxford University Press for the Infectious Diseases Society of America 2019.
Entities:
Keywords:
burden; immunization; influenza; mathematical model
Authors: Suzanne E Ohmit; Mark G Thompson; Joshua G Petrie; Swathi N Thaker; Michael L Jackson; Edward A Belongia; Richard K Zimmerman; Manjusha Gaglani; Lois Lamerato; Sarah M Spencer; Lisa Jackson; Jennifer K Meece; Mary Patricia Nowalk; Juhee Song; Marcus Zervos; Po-Yung Cheng; Charles R Rinaldo; Lydia Clipper; David K Shay; Pedro Piedra; Arnold S Monto Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2013-11-13 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Carlos A DiazGranados; Andrew J Dunning; Murray Kimmel; Daniel Kirby; John Treanor; Avi Collins; Richard Pollak; Janet Christoff; John Earl; Victoria Landolfi; Earl Martin; Sanjay Gurunathan; Richard Nathan; David P Greenberg; Nadia G Tornieporth; Michael D Decker; H Keipp Talbot Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2014-08-14 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Matthew Biggerstaff; Michael Jhung; Laurie Kamimoto; Lina Balluz; Lyn Finelli Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2012-08-16 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Brendan Flannery; Jessie R Chung; Edward A Belongia; Huong Q McLean; Manjusha Gaglani; Kempapura Murthy; Richard K Zimmerman; Mary Patricia Nowalk; Michael L Jackson; Lisa A Jackson; Arnold S Monto; Emily T Martin; Angie Foust; Wendy Sessions; LaShondra Berman; John R Barnes; Sarah Spencer; Alicia M Fry Journal: MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep Date: 2018-02-16 Impact factor: 17.586
Authors: Lisa A Grohskopf; Leslie Z Sokolow; Karen R Broder; Emmanuel B Walter; Alicia M Fry; Daniel B Jernigan Journal: MMWR Recomm Rep Date: 2018-08-24
Authors: Jessie R Chung; Brendan Flannery; Manjusha Gaglani; Michael E Smith; Evelyn C Reis; Robert W Hickey; Michael L Jackson; Lisa A Jackson; Edward A Belongia; Huong Q McLean; Emily T Martin; Hannah E Segaloff; Sara S Kim; Manish M Patel Journal: JAMA Pediatr Date: 2020-07-01 Impact factor: 16.193
Authors: Allison Kempe; Alison W Saville; Christina Albertin; Laura Helmkamp; Xinkai Zhou; Sitaram Vangela; L Miriam Dickinson; Chi-Hong Tseng; Jonathan D Campbell; Melanie Whittington; Dennis Gurfinkel; Heather Roth; Dina Hoefer; Peter Szilagyi Journal: Acad Pediatr Date: 2019-11-05 Impact factor: 3.107
Authors: Peter G Szilagyi; Christina S Albertin; Alison W Saville; Rebecca Valderrama; Abigail Breck; Laura Helmkamp; Xinkai Zhou; Sitaram Vangala; L Miriam Dickinson; Chi-Hong Tseng; Jonathan D Campbell; Melanie D Whittington; Heather Roth; Cynthia M Rand; Sharon G Humiston; Dina Hoefer; Allison Kempe Journal: J Pediatr Date: 2020-06 Impact factor: 4.406
Authors: Peng-Jun Lu; Mei-Chuan Hung; Anup Srivastav; Lisa A Grohskopf; Miwako Kobayashi; Aaron M Harris; Kathleen L Dooling; Lauri E Markowitz; Alfonso Rodriguez-Lainz; Walter W Williams Journal: MMWR Surveill Summ Date: 2021-05-14
Authors: Joshua D Doyle; Lauren Beacham; Emily T Martin; H Keipp Talbot; Arnold Monto; Manjusha Gaglani; Donald B Middleton; Fernanda P Silveira; Richard K Zimmerman; Elif Alyanak; Emily R Smith; Brendan L Flannery; Melissa Rolfes; Jill M Ferdinands Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2021-03-15 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Kailey Hughes; Donald B Middleton; Mary Patricia Nowalk; Goundappa K Balasubramani; Emily T Martin; Manjusha Gaglani; H Keipp Talbot; Manish M Patel; Jill M Ferdinands; Richard K Zimmerman; Fernanda P Silveira Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2021-12-06 Impact factor: 9.079