Soojin Cho-Reyes1, Bartolome R Celli2, Carole Dembek3, Karen Yeh1, Maryam Navaie1,4. 1. Advance Health Solutions, LLC, New York, New York. 2. Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Center, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts. 3. Global Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Sunovion Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Marlborough, Massachusetts. 4. Columbia University, School of Professional Studies, New York, New York.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Metered dose inhalers (MDIs) are commonly prescribed for inhalation therapy, but correct use is critical to promoting effective medication delivery. This systematic literature review and meta-analysis evaluates the overall and step-by-step prevalence of errors among adults with obstructive lung diseases in the United States who used MDIs. METHODS: Electronic and manual searches conducted between 1979-2018 using PubMed, EMBASE, PsycINFO, Cochrane, and Google identified 10 articles that met the following inclusion criteria: (a) English language, (b) U.S. adults diagnosed with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and (c) MDI use error rates. Meta-analytic techniques using random-effects models were applied to calculate effect sizes, weighted proportions, and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Heterogeneity was assessed by the I2 statistic. RESULTS: Aggregate findings revealed that 86.7% of patients (n=390, 95% CI 77.5-96.0) made at least 1 inhalation technique error, and 76.9% (n=885, 95% CI 65.8-87.9) incorrectly performed ≥ 20% of device use steps. The most prevalent step-by-step errors across the studies (n=1105) were failure to: (a) exhale fully and away from the inhaler before inhalation (65.5% [95% CI 52.0, 78.9]); (b) hold breath for 5-10 seconds (41.9% [95% CI 29.8, 53.9]); (c) inhale slowly and deeply (39.4% [95% CI 26.2, 52.5]); (d) exhale after inhalation (35.9% [95% CI 17.0, 54.8]); and (e) shake the inhaler before use (34.2% [95% CI 30.6, 37.7]). CONCLUSIONS: Across the studies used in this meta-analysis more than three-fourths of U.S. adults with obstructive lung diseases used MDIs incorrectly. Our findings suggest the need for ongoing patient education and consideration of alternative devices to mitigate errors. JCOPDF
BACKGROUND: Metered dose inhalers (MDIs) are commonly prescribed for inhalation therapy, but correct use is critical to promoting effective medication delivery. This systematic literature review and meta-analysis evaluates the overall and step-by-step prevalence of errors among adults with obstructive lung diseases in the United States who used MDIs. METHODS: Electronic and manual searches conducted between 1979-2018 using PubMed, EMBASE, PsycINFO, Cochrane, and Google identified 10 articles that met the following inclusion criteria: (a) English language, (b) U.S. adults diagnosed with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and (c) MDI use error rates. Meta-analytic techniques using random-effects models were applied to calculate effect sizes, weighted proportions, and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Heterogeneity was assessed by the I2 statistic. RESULTS: Aggregate findings revealed that 86.7% of patients (n=390, 95% CI 77.5-96.0) made at least 1 inhalation technique error, and 76.9% (n=885, 95% CI 65.8-87.9) incorrectly performed ≥ 20% of device use steps. The most prevalent step-by-step errors across the studies (n=1105) were failure to: (a) exhale fully and away from the inhaler before inhalation (65.5% [95% CI 52.0, 78.9]); (b) hold breath for 5-10 seconds (41.9% [95% CI 29.8, 53.9]); (c) inhale slowly and deeply (39.4% [95% CI 26.2, 52.5]); (d) exhale after inhalation (35.9% [95% CI 17.0, 54.8]); and (e) shake the inhaler before use (34.2% [95% CI 30.6, 37.7]). CONCLUSIONS: Across the studies used in this meta-analysis more than three-fourths of U.S. adults with obstructive lung diseases used MDIs incorrectly. Our findings suggest the need for ongoing patient education and consideration of alternative devices to mitigate errors. JCOPDF
Authors: Katie Kiser; Daniel Jonas; Zachary Warner; Kelli Scanlon; Betsy Bryant Shilliday; Darren A DeWalt Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2011-09-21 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Jeanne E Moorman; Lara J Akinbami; Cathy M Bailey; Hatice S Zahran; Michael E King; Carol A Johnson; Xiang Liu Journal: Vital Health Stat 3 Date: 2012-11
Authors: Andrea S Melani; Marco Bonavia; Eliuccia Mastropasqua; Alessandro Zanforlin; Marco Lodi; Paola Martucci; Nicola Scichilone; Maria Aliani; Margherita Neri; Piersante Sestini Journal: Respir Care Date: 2016-12-20 Impact factor: 2.258
Authors: Rajiv Dhand; Donald A Mahler; Brian W Carlin; Nicola A Hanania; Jill A Ohar; Victor Pinto-Plata; Tina Shah; David Eubanks; Sidney S Braman Journal: Respir Care Date: 2018-03-20 Impact factor: 2.258
Authors: Nicola A Hanania; Sidney Braman; Sandra G Adams; Ruth Adewuya; Arzu Ari; JoAnn Brooks; Donald A Mahler; Jill A Ohar; Jay Peters; Shahin Sanjar Journal: Chronic Obstr Pulm Dis Date: 2018-04-01
Authors: Henry Chrystyn; Job van der Palen; Raj Sharma; Neil Barnes; Bruno Delafont; Anadi Mahajan; Mike Thomas Journal: NPJ Prim Care Respir Med Date: 2017-04-03 Impact factor: 2.871
Authors: Cara B Pasquale; Radmila Choate; Gretchen McCreary; Richard A Mularski; William Clark; MaryEllen Houlihan; Elisha Malanga; Barbara P Yawn Journal: Chronic Obstr Pulm Dis Date: 2021-10-28
Authors: Didier Cataldo; Shane Hanon; Rudi V Peché; Daniel J Schuermans; Jean M Degryse; Isabelle A De Wulf; Karin Elinck; Mathias H Leys; Peter L Rummens; Eric Derom Journal: Adv Ther Date: 2022-01-26 Impact factor: 3.845