Literature DB >> 31340230

Decomposition Rate, pH, and Enamel Color Alteration of At-Home and In-Office Bleaching Agents.

Vanessa Cavalli1, Bruna Guerra da Silva1, Sandrine Bittencourt Berger2, Fabiano Carlos Marson3, Cinthia Pereira Machado Tabchoury4, Marcelo Giannini1.   

Abstract

This study evaluated the decomposition rate (DR), pH, enamel color alteration (DE) and whiteness index (DWI) promoted by at-home and in-office bleaching. Enamel surface was submitted to (n=10): at-home (10%, 15%, 20% carbamide peroxide - CP, 6% hydrogen peroxide -HP) and three 35% HP agents with light irradiation (LED, laser, and halogen) or no treatment (control). The DR and pH of agents were measured after 0, 2, 4, 6 and 8 h (at-home) or after 5, 15, 20, 30 and 40 min (in-office). Color parameters (L*, a*, b*, DE, DWI) were determined at baseline and after bleaching. DR, pH, L*, a*, b* data were analyzed by one-way (at-home) or two-way (in-office) repeated measures ANOVA and Tukey test. DE and DWI, by one-way (at-home) or two-way (in-office) ANOVA and Tukey test. DR of at-home agents was similar after 6 and 8 h (p>0.05), with pH close to neutral (6.5 to 6.9, CP) or acid 5.9 (6% HP). From 4 to 8 h, DE was higher for 15% and 20% CP compared with 10% CP (p<0.05). After 40 min, DR of 35% HP agents was similar and all exhibited significant DE in one application (p<0.05), regardless light irradiation. DWI indicated whitening effect with no differences among groups (p>0.05). One 35% HP showed alkaline pH, and the others, pH < 5.5. At-home agents could be applied for 2 h (15%, 20% CP, 6% HP) and 4 h (10% CP) and the in-office agents, up to 40 min in one application, without light.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31340230     DOI: 10.1590/0103-6440201902484

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Braz Dent J        ISSN: 0103-6440


  5 in total

1.  Strategy for reducing cytotoxicity and obtaining esthetic efficacy with 15 min of in-office dental bleaching.

Authors:  Uxua Ortecho-Zuta; Carla Caroline de Oliveira Duque; Rafael Antonio de Oliveira Ribeiro; Maria Luísa Leite; Diana Gabriela Soares; Josimeri Hebling; André Luiz Fraga Briso; Carlos Alberto de Souza Costa
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2022-02-23       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  In vitro analysis of the pH stability of dental bleaching gels during in-office procedures.

Authors:  Rafael-Pinto de Mendonça; Joberth-Rainner Baliza; Adrieli Burey; Larissa-Maria-Assad Cavalcante; Alessandro-Dourado Loguercio; Fernanda-Signorelli Calazans; Marcos-de Oliveira Barceleiro
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2021-01-01

3.  The Whitening Effect and Histological Safety of Nonthermal Atmospheric Plasma Inducing Tooth Bleaching.

Authors:  Seoul-Hee Nam; Byul Bo Ra Choi; Gyoo-Cheon Kim
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-04-28       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  Novel Experimental In-Office Bleaching Gels Containing Co-Doped Titanium Dioxide Nanoparticles.

Authors:  Matheus Kury; Rochelle D Hiers; Yan D Zhao; Mayara Z D Picolo; Jessica Hsieh; Sharukh S Khajotia; Fernando L Esteban Florez; Vanessa Cavalli
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-30       Impact factor: 5.719

5.  In-office tooth bleaching with chitosan-enriched hydrogen peroxide gels: in vitro results.

Authors:  Núbia Inocencya Pavesi Pini; Marcella Ricomini Piccelli; Waldemir Franscisco Vieira-Junior; Laura Nobre Ferraz; Flávio Henrique Baggio Aguiar; Débora Alves Nunes Leite Lima
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2021-06-12       Impact factor: 3.573

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.