| Literature DB >> 31338461 |
Setthawat Thanimkarn1, Ekkapong Cheevitsopon2, Jiraporn Sripinyowanich Jongyingcharoen1.
Abstract
Infrared (IR), vibratory bed assisted infrared (VIR), vacuum infrared (VC-IR), and vibratory bed assisted vacuum infrared (VC-VIR) drying of Cissus quadrangularis Linn. (CQ) were conducted. The objective was to investigate the effects of vibration, vacuum, and material thickness on IR drying of CQ. VC-VIR drying of 5-mm CQ provided the highest maximum drying rate (DR) of 0.258 g water/g dry matter·min. Although the vacuum operation contributed to improved effective moisture diffusivity (D eff ), it consumed high energy and degraded active compounds of CQ. VIR drying could be a more promising technique. VIR drying of 15-mm CQ produced the greatest total phenolic content (TPC) and quercetin content of 1083.62 mg GAE/100 g dry matter and 3.472 mg/100 g dry matter, respectively. The lowest total color difference (ΔE) of 13.69 was also obtained. It required low specific energy consumption (SEC) of 17.62 kWh/kg and provided maximum DR of 0.112 g water/g dry matter·min.Entities:
Keywords: Cissus quadrangularis Linn.; Food science; Food technology; Infrared drying; Quercetin; Vacuum drying; Vibration
Year: 2019 PMID: 31338461 PMCID: PMC6626483 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01999
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Heliyon ISSN: 2405-8440
Fig. 1Fresh CQ stems.
Fig. 2A VC-VIR dryer.
Drying time and maximum DR of CQ drying.
| Drying method | Thickness (mm) | Drying time (min) | Maximum |
|---|---|---|---|
| IR | 5 | 110 | 0.147 ± 0.001 |
| 10 | 140 | 0.121 ± 0.005 | |
| 15 | 180 | 0.107 ± 0.002 | |
| VIR | 5 | 95 | 0.160 ± 0.003 |
| 10 | 120 | 0.130 ± 0.002 | |
| 15 | 160 | 0.112 ± 0.001 | |
| VC-IR | 5 | 75 | 0.238 ± 0.001 |
| 10 | 90 | 0.200 ± 0.001 | |
| 15 | 100 | 0.193 ± 0.001 | |
| VC-VIR | 5 | 70 | 0.258 ± 0.001 |
| 10 | 85 | 0.202 ± 0.001 | |
| 15 | 90 | 0.197 ± 0.010 |
Fig. 3MR curves of IR, VIR, VC-IR, and VC-VIR drying of CQ with the thickness of 15 mm.
Fig. 4DR curves of IR, VIR, VC-IR, and VC-VIR drying of CQ with the thickness of 15 mm.
Fig. 5MR curves of VIR drying of CQ of different material thicknesses.
Fig. 6DR curves of VIR drying of CQ of different material thicknesses.
Fig. 7Effective moisture diffusivity of CQ during the infrared drying process.
Fig. 8Specific energy consumption (bars) vs. drying time (plots) of CQ drying.
TPC (mg GAE/100 g dry matter) of dried CQ as affected by vibration, vacuum, and material thickness.
| Drying method | Material thickness (mm) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 5 | 10 | 15 | |
| IR | 870.82 ± 14.14ns,b | 873.72 ± 8.67ns,b | 868.93 ± 8.42ns,d |
| VIR | 912.44 ± 9.83c,a | 964.94 ± 11.37b,a | 1083.62 ± 6.84a,a |
| VC-IR | 832.72 ± 7.31b,c | 835.50 ± 11.02b,c | 962.20 ± 8.55a,c |
| VC-VIR | 839.91 ± 11.43c,c | 873.06 ± 10.86b,b | 1046.92 ± 9.04a,b |
| HA | 1060.25 ± 6.73 | ||
| Fresh | 1012.38 ± 6.73 | ||
Note: The HA dried and fresh samples were not included in the two-way analysis of variance.
Same first superscript indicates no significant difference within the same row (p < 0.05).
Same second superscript indicates no significant difference within the same column (p < 0.05).
Quercetin contents (mg/100 g dry matter) of dried CQ as affected by vibration, vacuum, and material thickness.
| Drying method | Thickness (mm) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 5 | 10 | 15 | |
| IR | 1.477 ± 0.044ns,b | 1.596 ± 0.115ns,b | 1.651 ± 0.088ns,c |
| VIR | 1.647 ± 0.036c,a | 2.627 ± 0.108b,a | 3.472 ± 0.353a,a |
| VC-IR | 0.921 ± 0.021b,c | 0.903 ± 0.023b,d | 1.273 ± 0.121a,c |
| VC-VIR | 0.897 ± 0.029c,c | 1.166 ± 0.015b,c | 2.312 ± 0.145a,b |
| HA | 0.997 ± 0.009 | ||
| Fresh | 0.888 ± 0.004 | ||
Note: The HA dried and fresh samples were not included in the two-way analysis of variance.
Same first superscript indicates no significant difference within the same row (p < 0.05).
Same second superscript indicates no significant difference within the same column (p < 0.05).
ΔE of dried CQ as affected by vibration, vacuum, and material thickness.
| Drying method | Material thickness (mm) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 5 | 10 | 15 | |
| IR | 14.83 ± 0.02b,d | 14.41 ± 0.03c,b | 15.23 ± 0.03a,c |
| VIR | 14.98 ± 0.02a,c | 14.05 ± 0.01b,d | 13.69 ± 0.03c,d |
| VC-IR | 16.40 ± 0.01a,a | 14.55 ± 0.03c,a | 15.40 ± 0.03b,b |
| VC-VIR | 15.55 ± 0.02b,b | 14.23 ± 0.02c,c | 15.81 ± 0.02a,a |
| HA | 17.71 ± 0.11 | ||
Note: The HA dried sample was not included in the two-way analysis of variance.
Same first superscript indicates no significant difference within the same row (p < 0.05).
Same second superscript indicates no significant difference within the same column (p < 0.05).