| Literature DB >> 30723828 |
Laura M Lara1, Shantae A Wilson2, Pengyin Chen1,3, G G Atungulu2.
Abstract
Vegetable soybean (Edamame) blanching with hot water/steam is an energy- and water- intensive process that may also result in compromised product quality. The effectiveness of infrared (IR) heating to dry and simultaneously blanch Edamame was investigated at heating intensities of 11.06, 8.43 and 6.99 kW/m2. Temperature, weight, texture, and green intensity of heated samples for various durations were determined. In general, product weight decreased during IR heating. The largest weight reduction (9.5 %) was achieved after 100 s of heating at the highest IR heating intensity. Hardness was reduced alongside treatment duration, reaching the lowest values (11172.9-10847 N) at 100 or 120 s despite heating intensity. The highest green intensity was recorded (0.33) for treatments at 100 or 120 s. The new process combined drying and blanching into one step which potentially improves processing efficiency and product quality.Entities:
Keywords: Food analysis; Food safety; Food science; Food technology; Nutrition
Year: 2019 PMID: 30723828 PMCID: PMC6350227 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01148
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Heliyon ISSN: 2405-8440
Two-factor factorial design of experiment with IR heating intensity and heating duration as fixed factors.
| Infrared (IR) Heating intensity | Infrared heating duration (s) |
|---|---|
| Low | 20 |
| Medium | 40 |
| High | 60 |
| 80 | |
| 90 | |
| 100 | |
| 120 |
Fig. 1Temperature profile of edamame beans during infrared heating under three heating intensities. Horizontal red dashed line represents targeted temperature (75 °C). Heating intensity is based on product-to-emitter gap (PEG). High heating intensity represents samples with PEG size of 6 cm, similarly medium is 8 cm, and low is 11 cm.
Analysis of variance, P- values of weight reduction, texture, and green intensity of edamame under infrared (IR) heating.
| Source | Degrees of freedom | Weight reduction | Texture | Green intensity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IR heating intensity | 2 | <0.0001 | 0.2311 | 0.0204 |
| IR heating duration | 6 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 |
| Heating intensity × IR heating duration | 7 | <0.0001 | 0.0845 | 0.9179 |
| Blocks | 3 | 0.2079 | 0.8802 | 0.4121 |
| Error | 45 |
Percentage of weight reduction on edamame under different infrared (IR) heating durations and intensities.
| IR heating duration (s) | Weight reduction (%) under three IR heating intensities | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| High | Medium | Low | |
| 20 | 0.99 ± 0.29I | 1.29 ± 0.29HI | 1.29 ± 0.29HI |
| 40 | 2.10 ± 0.29GHI | 2.59 ± 0.29FGH | 2.23 ± 0.29GHI |
| 60 | 4.03 ± 0.29DEF | 3.38 ± 0.29EFG | 3.76 ± 0.29EF |
| 80 | 6.79 ± 0.29BC | 5.46 ± 0.29CD | 4.77 ± 0.29DE |
| 90 | 6.42 ± 0.29BC | ||
| 100 | 9.56 ± 0.29A | 6.38 ± 0.29BC | |
| 120 | 7.85 ± 0.29B | ||
LS Means followed by the same letter are not significantly different at the 0.05 level by the Tukey's HSD test.
High, medium, and low represent heating intensity (based on product-to-emitter gap sizes of 6, 8, and 11 cm 11.06, 8.43 and 6.99 kW/m2, respectively).
Comparison of edamame texture and green intensity means under seven infrared heating durations.
| Infrared heating duration (s) | Sample size | Mean Texture (N) | Mean Green Intensity |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20 | 12 | 20372.89A ± 1904.85 | 0.20 ± 0.021C |
| 40 | 12 | 18904.33A ± 1832.44 | 0.22 ± 0.017C |
| 60 | 12 | 14911.68B ± 1785.79 | 0.23 ± 0.020C |
| 80 | 12 | 12783.33BC ± 1603.79 | 0.30 ± 0.020AB |
| 90 | 4 | 12517.35BC ± 903.50 | 0.29 ± 0.034B |
| 100 | 8 | 10847.03C ± 1254.05 | 0.31 ± 0.023AB |
| 120 | 4 | 11172.90C ± 590.87 | 0.33 ± 0.019A |
Means followed by the same letter are not significantly different at the 0.05 level by the Tukey's HSD test.
Fig. 2Texture of edamame under different infrared heating intensities and duration. High, medium, and low represent different product-to-emitter gap sizes of 6, 8, and 11 cm respectively.