| Literature DB >> 31336865 |
Yebin Chen1,2, Zhigang Zhao2, Zhichao Li3, Weihong Li4, Zhipeng Li5, Renzhong Guo6,7, Zhilu Yuan2.
Abstract
Dengue fever is one of the most common vector-borne diseases in the world and is mainly affected by the interaction of meteorological, human and land-use factors. This study aims to identify the impact of meteorological, human and land-use factors on dengue fever cases, involving the interplay between multiple factors. The analyses identified the statistically significant determinants affecting the transmission of dengue fever, employing cross-correlation analysis and the geo-detector model. This study was conducted in Guangzhou, China, using the data of confirmed cases of dengue fever, daily meteorological records, population density distribution and land-use distribution. The findings highlighted that the dengue fever hotspots were mainly distributed in the old city center of Guangzhou and were significantly shaped by meteorological, land-use and human factors. Meteorological factors including minimum temperature, maximum temperature, atmospheric pressure and relative humidity were correlated with the transmission of dengue fever. Minimum temperature, maximum temperature and relative humidity presented a statistically significant positive correlation with dengue fever cases, while atmospheric pressure presented statistically significant negative correlation. Minimum temperature, maximum temperature, atmospheric pressure and humidity have lag effects on the transmission of dengue fever. The population, community age, subway network density, road network density and ponds presented a statistically significant positive correlation with the number of dengue fever cases, and the interaction among land-use and human factors could enhance dengue fever transmission. The ponds were the most important interaction factors, which might strengthen the influence of other factors on dengue fever transmission. Our findings have implications for pre-emptive dengue fever control.Entities:
Keywords: dengue fever; determinants; geo-detector; spatial interactions
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31336865 PMCID: PMC6678723 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16142486
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Figure 1Extent of the study area. (A) The location of Guangdong Province in China; (B) the location of the study area in Guangdong Province; (C) the extent of the study area and population density distribution.
Figure 2Spatial distribution of dengue fever (DF) cases.
The factor data used in the study.
| Factor Type | Variables | Description | Unit |
|---|---|---|---|
| Meteorological Data | Minimum Temperature | Daily minimum temperature | °C |
| Maximum Temperature | Daily maximum temperature | °C | |
| Atmospheric Pressure | Daily atmospheric pressure | hPa | |
| Relative Humidity | Daily relative humidity | % | |
| Human Data | Population | Number of people on the building | - |
| Community age | Time span from the completion of the residential community to 2014 | Years | |
| Land-use Data | Road | Road network density | km/km2 |
| Subway | Subway lines network density | km/km2 | |
| Ponds | Ponds area | m2 |
Figure 3Sequence of weekly DF cases and meteorological factors in Guangzhou, 2014.
Figure 4Transmission characteristics of DF cases.
Figure 5Distribution of the monthly gravity center of DF.
Cross-correlation coefficients between weekly DF cases and meteorological variables.
| Lag Weeks | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tmin (°C) | 0.480 ** | 0.551 ** | 0.624 ** | 0.703 ** | 0.765 ** | 0.801 ** | 0.849 ** | 0.894 ** | 0.913 ** | 0.927 ** | 0.945 ** | 0.935 ** | 0.890 ** |
| Tmax (°C) | 0.588 ** | 0.642 ** | 0.712 ** | 0.783 ** | 0.833 ** | 0.850 ** | 0.878 ** | 0.917 ** | 0.901 ** | 0.882 ** | 0.862 ** | 0.840 ** | 0.786 ** |
| AP (hpa) | −0.360 ** | −0.414 ** | −0.488 ** | −0.593 ** | −0.649 ** | −0.705 ** | −0.787 ** | −0.836 ** | −0.859 ** | −0.895 ** | −0.916 ** | −0.920 ** | −0.890 ** |
| Hum (%) | −0.203 | −0.155 * | −0.07 | 0.017 | 0.049 | 0.139 | 0.239 | 0.273 | 0.329 * | 0.42 ** | 0.495 ** | 0.493 ** | 0.523 ** |
Note: ** Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed); * Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).
Result of factor-detector analysis.
| Factor | Population | Community Age | Subway | Road | Ponds |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| q | 0.624 | 0.382 | 0.134 | 0.050 | 0.001 |
| p | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.04 |
Result of interaction detector.
| Factor | Population | Community Age | Subway | Road | Ponds |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Population | 0.624 | ||||
| Community Age | 0.658 | 0.382 | |||
| Subway | 0.643 | 0.421 | 0.134 | ||
| Road | 0.640 | 0.413 | 0.183 | 0.050 | |
| Ponds | 0.625 | 0.388 | 0.146 | 0.058 | 0.003 |