| Literature DB >> 31336035 |
Chan Li1, Ruth Whelan2, Hua Yang1, Yaling Jiang3, Chaosen Qiu3, Qingyong Meng1, Jun Wei2.
Abstract
It was recently reported that levels of plasma IgG antibodies against peptide antigens derived from proteins encoded by schizophrenia-associated genes are altered in individuals with schizophrenia treated with antipsychotics. This study aimed to replicate the initial finding in antipsychotic-naïve patients with first-episode schizophrenia and to explore the possible mechanism by which immune tolerance of B cells may be altered in this disease. A total of 408 case-control plasma samples were collected for analysis of circulating IgG antibodies against fragments derived from TCF4, TSNARE1, ZNF804A, TRANK1, ERCC4, DPYD and CD25 using an in-house ELISA. The Mann-Whitney U-test revealed that patients with schizophrenia had a significant change in plasma anti-TSNARE1 and anti-CD25 IgG levels; male patients mainly contributed to the increased levels of anti-TSNARE1 IgG and anti-CD25 IgG. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis revealed that the anti-TSNARE1 IgG assay had an area under the ROC curve of 0.625 with a sensitivity of 15.7% and a specificity of 95.2%. Work on a B-cell model revealed that TRANK1-derived antigen treatments could enhance the proportions of CD83+ cells and apoptotic B cells when compared with TSNARE1-derived antigen and vehicle treatment. We conclude that there is a gender difference in autoimmune responses in schizophrenia and suggest that anti-TSNARE1 IgG may be indicative of schizophrenia in a subgroup of male patients.Entities:
Keywords: zzm321990ELISAzzm321990; B lymphocytes; TSNARE1; autoantibodies; gender difference; schizophrenia
Year: 2019 PMID: 31336035 PMCID: PMC6768289 DOI: 10.1002/2211-5463.12704
Source DB: PubMed Journal: FEBS Open Bio ISSN: 2211-5463 Impact factor: 2.693
Analysis of circulating IgG against individual antigens tested.
| Antigen | Control, Mean ± SD | Patient, Mean ± SD |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TSNARE1 | ||||
| Male | 0.587 ± 0.256 | 0.781 ± 0.312 | −4.663 | < 0.001 |
| Female | 0.716 ± 0.324 | 0.766 ± 0.327 | −1.121 | 0.262 |
| Both | 0.647 ± 0.296 | 0.781 ± 0.323 | −4.332 | < 0.001 |
| ZNF804A | ||||
| Male | 0.675 ± 0.195 | 0.743 ± 0.210 | −2.152 | 0.031 |
| Female | 0.716 ± 0.215 | 0.756 ± 0.229 | −1.115 | 0.265 |
| Both | 0.694 ± 0.205 | 0.753 ± 0.222 | −2.375 | 0.018 |
| TRANK1 | ||||
| Male | 1.101 ± 0.415 | 1.185 ± 0.428 | −1.391 | 0.164 |
| Female | 1.148 ± 0.434 | 1.233 ± 0.435 | −1.120 | 0.263 |
| Both | 1.123 ± 0.424 | 1.214 ± 0.439 | −1.870 | 0.061 |
| DPYD | ||||
| Male | 1.433 ± 0.603 | 1.463 ± 0.710 | −0.045 | 0.964 |
| Female | 1.544 ± 0.619 | 1.591 ± 0.646 | −0.507 | 0.612 |
| Both | 1.485 ± 0.611 | 1.525 ± 0.691 | −0.434 | 0.664 |
| TCF4 | ||||
| Male | 0.397 ± 0.123 | 0.405 ± 0.184 | −0.579 | 0.563 |
| Female | 0.474 ± 0.171 | 0.417 ± 0.155 | −2.244 | 0.025 |
| Both | 0.433 ± 0.152 | 0.413 ± 0.171 | −1.489 | 0.136 |
| CD25 | ||||
| Male | 0.731 ± 0.276 | 0.934 ± 0.438 | −4.347 | < 0.001 |
| Female | 0.833 ± 0.314 | 0.901 ± 0.429 | −0.816 | 0.415 |
| Both | 0.779 ± 0.298 | 0.907 ± 0.391 | −3.756 | < 0.001 |
| ERCC4 | ||||
| Male | 1.189 ± 0.615 | 1.417 ± 0.759 | −1.849 | 0.064 |
| Female | 1.205 ± 0.535 | 1.281 ± 0.648 | −0.538 | 0.590 |
| Both | 1.196 ± 0.578 | 1.326 ± 0.670 | −1.702 | 0.089 |
a P < 0.007 was considered statistically significant based on the Bonferroni correction as seven antigens were tested.
ROC analysis of IgG antibodies against individual autoantigens. SE, standard error.
| Antigen | Sensitivity (%) | AUC | SE | Asymptotic 95% CI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lower | Upper | ||||
| TSNARE1 | 15.7 | 0.625 | 0.028 | 0.571 | 0.680 |
| Male | 19.3 | 0.689 | 0.037 | 0.615 | 0.762 |
| Female | 14.4 | 0.547 | 0.041 | 0.466 | 0.628 |
| ZNF804A | 7.3 | 0.569 | 0.029 | 0.512 | 0.625 |
| Male | 11.4 | 0.587 | 0.040 | 0.509 | 0.665 |
| Female | 9.9 | 0.546 | 0.041 | 0.464 | 0.628 |
| TRANK1 | 7.3 | 0.554 | 0.029 | 0.498 | 0.611 |
| Male | 8.0 | 0.556 | 0.041 | 0.477 | 0.636 |
| Female | 7.8 | 0.547 | 0.042 | 0.465 | 0.628 |
| DPYD | 6.7 | 0.513 | 0.029 | 0.455 | 0.570 |
| Male | 9.1 | 0.502 | 0.041 | 0.422 | 0.582 |
| Female | 6.7 | 0.521 | 0.041 | 0.439 | 0.603 |
| TCF4 | 12.4 | 0.543 | 0.029 | 0.486 | 0.600 |
| Male | 13.6 | 0.523 | 0.043 | 0.440 | 0.607 |
| Female | 11.1 | 0.593 | 0.041 | 0.514 | 0.673 |
| CD25 | 9.6 | 0.609 | 0.028 | 0.554 | 0.664 |
| Male | 12.5 | 0.676 | 0.037 | 0.603 | 0.749 |
| Female | 4.4 | 0.534 | 0.042 | 0.452 | 0.615 |
| ERC4 | 10.1 | 0.549 | 0.029 | 0.493 | 0.606 |
| Male | 11.4 | 0.575 | 0.040 | 0.497 | 0.652 |
| Female | 8.9 | 0.522 | 0.042 | 0.441 | 0.604 |
a Specificity of 95.2%.
Figure 1Changes in CD83+ cell proportion in RPMI B lymphocytes treated with 40 μg·mL−1 peptide antigens over 48 h. The error bars represent SD, and Student's t‐test was used to examine the difference in the proportion of CD83 expression cells; **P < 0.005 when compared with vehicle control. In this study, only P < 0.017 is considered statistically significant based on the Bonferroni correction as three independent treatments were given.
Figure 2Analysis of apoptotic RPMI B lymphocytes treated with 40 μg·mL−1 peptide antigens over 48 h. The error bars represent SD, and Student's t‐test was used to examine the difference in the proportion of apoptotic cells; **P < 0.005 when compared with vehicle control. In this study, only P < 0.017 is considered statistically significant based on the Bonferroni correction as three independent treatments were given.