| Literature DB >> 31333678 |
Kristoffer Jarlov Jensen1,2, Mette Sif Hansen3, Peter Mikael Helweg Heegaard4, Christine Stabell Benn1,5, Gregers Jungersen2.
Abstract
Background: Vaccines may have non-specific effects, affecting resistance to heterologous pathogens. Veterinary vaccines have seldom been investigated for their non-specific effects. However, recent observational studies suggest that an inactivated paratuberculosis vaccine reduced all-cause mortality in goats and cattle. Aim: We tested if vaccination with a killed mycobacterial vaccine may have heterologous effects in swine (Sus domesticus), specifically on the pathogenic and clinical effects of a heterologous challenge with Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae in young pigs.Entities:
Keywords: actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae; heterologous immunity; mycobacterial vaccine; non-specific effects of vaccines; paratuberculosis vaccine; pigs (sus domesticus)
Year: 2019 PMID: 31333678 PMCID: PMC6624675 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.01557
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Immunol ISSN: 1664-3224 Impact factor: 7.561
Figure 1Timeline of experiment.
Background information.
| 17 | 16 | |
| Sex male/female | 8/9 | 11/5 |
| Weight kg day0, median (min-max) | 1.5 (1.1–2.0) | 1.5 (1.1–2.4) |
| Weight kg day33, median (min-max) | 8.0 (3.5–10.0) | 8.3 (3.0–11.0) |
| App low dose / high dose | 9/8 | 8/8 |
App, Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae.
Figure 2In vitro cytokine responses. Concentrations of cytokines of IFN-γ (A,B) and IL-6 (C–F) in whole blood cultures after overnight stimulation with purified protein derivative of M. avium subsp. paratuberculosis (A,C), phytohaemagglutinin (B,D), lipopolysaccharide (E) or Pam3CSK4 (F), including the non-stimulated medium alone (Nil), comparing Gudair vaccinated (n = 17) with non-vaccinated control animals (n = 16). Statistical test for difference by vaccination using Kruskal-Wallis and for paired analysis of stimulation effect using Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-rank test; *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001. Note the different scales in the sub-graphs. Means of the subgroups are indicated on the graphs.
Figure 3Rectal temperatures before and after challenge. Rectal temperatures immediately before challenge and the following day, comparing previously Gudair-vaccinated with control animals receiving a low dose (Gudair: n = 9; control: n = 8) or a high dose (Gudair: n = 8; control: n = 8) of A. pleuropneumoniae (App). Statistical analysis of change in temperatures after challenge using Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-ranks test; *p < 0.05.
Colony counts and pathology scores.
| Gudair | 9 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| control | 8 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 0 |
| Gudair | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 7 |
| control | 8 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 5 |
Colony counts after re-cultivation of lung tissues and pathological assessment of inner organs after challenge with A. pleuropneumoniae (App), comparing Gudair vaccinated with unvaccinated control animals. Statistical analysis using Kruskal-Wallis test for colony counts and Wilcoxon rank-sum test for pathology scores dichotomized as ≥2 vs. <2.
Figure 4Acut-phase proteins before and after challenge. Means of concentrations of acute phase proteins C-reactive protein (CRP), haptoglobin and the negative acute phase protein pig α1-acid glycoprotein (PAGP) in serum immediately before challenge (day 0) and the following day (day 1), comparing previously Gudair-vaccinated with control animals; the animals were receiving a low dose (Gudair: n = 9; control: n = 8) or a high dose (Gudair: n = 8; control: n = 8) of A. pleuropneumoniae (App) on day 0. PAGP levels are relative to the index defined by the mean level of the low A. pleuropneumoniae control animals before challenge. Note the different scales in the sub-graphs. Statistical analysis of change in concentrations from day 0 to day 1 using Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-rank test (for paired samples) and analysis of differences by Gudair vaccination on day 0 concentrations and on fold changes after challenge using Kruskal-Wallis test; *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01. Error bar is standard deviation. Hatched horizontal line on Haptoglobin graph is the lower limit of detection.