| Literature DB >> 35436975 |
Rita Vaz-Rodrigues1, Elisa Ferreras-Colino1, María Ugarte-Ruíz2, Michele Pesciaroli3, Jobin Thomas4,5, Teresa García-Seco2, Iker A Sevilla6, Marta Pérez-Sancho2,7, Rafael Mateo1, Lucas Domínguez2,7, Christian Gortazar8, María A Risalde9,10,11.
Abstract
Trained immunity is the capacity of innate immune cells to produce an improved response against a secondary infection after a previous unrelated infection. Salmonellosis represents a public health issue and affects the pig farming industry. In general, vaccination against salmonellosis is still facing problems regarding the control of distinct serovars. Therefore, we hypothesized that an immunostimulant based on heat inactivated Mycobacterium bovis (HIMB) could have an immune training effect in pigs challenged with Salmonella enterica serovar Choleraesuis (S. Choleraesuis) and decided to explore the amplitude of this non-specific immune response. For this purpose, twenty-four 10 days-old female piglets were randomly separated in three groups: immunized group (n = 10) received orally two doses of HIMB prior to the intratracheal S. Choleraesuis-challenge, positive control group (n = 9) that was only challenged with S. Choleraesuis, and negative control group (n = 5) that was neither immunized nor infected. All individuals were necropsied 21 days post-challenge. HIMB improved weight gain and reduced respiratory symptoms and pulmonary lesions caused by S. Choleraesuis in pigs. Pigs immunized with HIMB showed higher cytokine production, especially of serum TNFα and lung CCL28, an important mediator of mucosal trained immunity. Moreover, immunized pigs showed lower levels of the biomarker of lipid oxidation malondialdehyde and higher activity of the antioxidant enzyme superoxide dismutase than untreated challenged pigs. However, the excretion and tissue colonization of S. Choleraesuis remained unaffected. This proof-of-concept study suggests beneficial clinical, pathological, and heterologous immunological effects against bacterial pathogens within the concept of trained immunity, opening avenues for further research.Entities:
Keywords: Heat-inactivated Mycobacterium bovis; Salmonella Choleraesuis; pig; trained immunity
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35436975 PMCID: PMC9014587 DOI: 10.1186/s13567-022-01047-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Vet Res ISSN: 0928-4249 Impact factor: 3.829
Data collection calendar indicating the days each measure or monitorization was made
| Days | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 7 | 9 | 14 | 15 | 20 | 21 | |
| BT | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | |
| W | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ||||||
| BW | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | |||||
| SS | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ||||||
| CS | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ||||
Days post-infection (dpi) that animals were handled for measurement of body temperature (BT), weight (W), blood withdrawal (BW), collection of stool samples (SS) and clinical sign (CS) monitoring.
Macroscopic lesions per organ taken into account for scoring
| Organ | Macroscopic lesions |
|---|---|
| Lymphadenomegaly and congestion | |
| Interstitial pneumonia | |
| Hydropericardium | |
| Focal necrosis | |
| Splenomegaly and hyperaemia | |
| Enteritis, congestion and petechiae | |
| Focal necrosis and petechiae |
Details of primer sequences for RT-PCR assessment of pulmonary cytokines in pigs challenged with
| Target | Amplicon size (base pairs) | Primer Forward (5ʹ–3ʹ) | Primer Reverse (5ʹ–3ʹ) | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 134 | ACTCGGAACCTCATGGACAG | AGGGGTGAGTCAGTGTGACC | [ | |
| 79 | TGGTAGCTCTGGGAAACTGAATG | GGCTTTGCGCTGGATCTG | [ | |
| 145 | GCTGCTGCACTGAGGTTTC | TGAGGGCTGACACAGATTC | [ | |
| 274 | GCTGCTGTGCTAAATAACCT | CTTGTGGCAATAAACAACTTT | [ | |
| 240 | TCTTGGCAGTTTTCCTGCTT | CAACCTTCTGCACCCACTTT | [ | |
| 369 | TAACCCCACCGTCTTCTT | TGCCATCCAACCACTCAG | [ |
CCL28, C–C Motif chemokine ligand 28; IFNγ, Interferon gamma; IL-1α, Interleukin 1 alfa; IL-8, Interleukin 8; TNFα, Tumour necrosis factor alpha.
Quantitative PCR conditions and efficiency, R values and number of cycles used for each porcine cytokine and cyclophilin cDNA
| PCR conditions and efficiency | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cytokine | Initial Denaturation | Denaturation | Annealing | Elongation | Number of PCR cycles | PCR efficiency | R |
| TNFα | 95 °C (10 min) | 95 °C (15 s) | 60 °C (1 min) | 40 | 2.168 | 0.994 | |
| IFNγ | 95 °C (10 min) | 95 °C (15 s) | 60 °C (1 min) | 40 | 1.982 | 0.999 | |
| CCL28 | 95 °C (3 min) | 95 °C (15 s) | 56 °C (30 s) | 60 °C (30 s) | 45 | 2.097 | 0.997 |
| IL-1α | 94 °C (2 min) | 94 °C (20 s) | 60 °C (1 min) | 45 | 1.983 | 0.999 | |
| IL-8 | 94 °C (2 min) | 94 °C (20 s) | 60 °C (1 min) | 45 | 1.992 | 0.998 | |
| Cyclophilin | 94 °C (3 min) | 94 °C (45 s) | 54 °C (45 s) | 60 °C (45 s) | 30 | 1.864 | 0.999 |
CCL28, C–C Motif chemokine ligand 28; IFNγ, Interferon gamma; IL-1α, Interleukin 1 alfa; IL-8, Interleukin 8; TNFα, Tumour necrosis factor alpha.
Figure 1Clinical signs, temperature increment and weight gain in pigs infected and non-infected with Choleraesuis. Evolution of clinical signs score (A), temperature increment (C) and body weight gain (E) per group and days post-infection. Main effect plot for respiratory signs (B), temperature increment (D) and weight gain (F) using the combined effect of fixed variables group and day. CN: negative control group; CP: positive control group; I: immunized group; SE: standard error of the mean.
Figure 2Macroscopic lesions in pigs infected with Choleraesuis at 21 days post-infection. A Lung of an animal from the positive control group presenting an increased size and moderate interstitial pneumonia in the right cranial and middle lobes (white asterisk). B Thoracic and abdominal cavities of an animal from the immunized group presenting organs without lesions. C Spleen and intestine of an animal from the positive control group showing adherence of connective tissue (black asterisks); moreover, the spleen presents multiple abscesses of purulent material (inset).
Figure 3Characterization of lung macroscopic lesions caused by Choleraesuis at 21 days post-infection. A Lung gross lesions severity and percentage of piglets affected in each group. B Lung macroscopic lesions score separated per groups. CP: positive control group; I: immunized group; SE: standard error of the mean; Type I: interstitial pneumonia with 1 lobe affected; Type II: interstitial pneumonia with 2 lobes affected; Type III: interstitial pneumonia with 3 lobes affected; Type IV: interstitial pneumonia with 4 lobes affected.
Figure 4Histopathological lesions in pigs infected with Choleraesuis at 21 days post-infection. A Lung of an animal from the positive control group presenting a moderate mixed interstitial inflammatory infiltrate (*), mainly composed of macrophages (MΦs) and lymphocytes (inset). B Lung of an animal from the immunized group showing a light thickening of the septa (*), due to infiltrate particularly of MΦs (inset). C Tracheobronchial lymphoid node of an animal from the positive control group presenting severe lymphoid depletion and compared with an animal from the immunized group (D). Haematoxylin–eosin stain.
Figure 5Microscopic lesions score in pigs infected with Choleraesuis. Lung (A), tracheobronchial lymph nodes (B) and total thoracic (C) microscopic lesions score in pigs infected with Salmonella Choleraesuis: a comparison between immunized and positive control groups. CP: positive control; I: immunized; LNs: lymph nodes; NS: not significant; TB: tracheobronchial.
Figure 6Oxidative stress biomarkers (dMDA, dGPx and dSOD) in pigs infected and non-infected with Choleraesuis. Evolution of the variation in concentration of MDA (A), SOD (C) and GPx (E) per group at different time points, using day 0 as starting point. Main effect plot for MDA (B), SOD (D) and GPx (F) variation, using the combined effect of group and day. CN: negative control group; CP: positive control group; I: immunized group; MDA: malondialdehyde; SOD: superoxide dismutase; GPx: glutathione peroxidase; SE: standard error of the mean.
Figure 7Cytokine serum concentration (dTNFα, dIL-1β and dIL-10) in pigs infected and non-infected with Choleraesuis. Evolution of the variation in concentration of TNFα (A), IL-1β (C) and IL-10 (E) per group at different time points, using day 0 as starting point. Main effect plot for TNFα (B), IL-1β (D) and IL-10 (F) and variation, using the combined effect of group and day. CN: negative control group; CP: positive control group; I: immunized group; TNFα: tumour necrosis factor α; IL-1β: interleukin 1 beta; IL-10: interleukin 10; SE: standard error of the mean.