Literature DB >> 31331450

When Do Clinicians Follow-up Abnormal Liver Tests in Primary Care?

Andrew D Schreiner1, John Bian2, Jingwen Zhang2, Elizabeth B Kirkland2, Marc E Heincelman2, Samuel O Schumann2, Patrick D Mauldin2, William P Moran2, Don C Rockey2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Many guidelines addressing the approach to abnormal liver chemistries, including bilirubin, transaminases and alkaline phosphatase, recommend repeating the tests. However, when clinicians repeat testing is unknown.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: This retrospective study followed adult patients with abnormal liver chemistries in a patient-centered medical home (PCMH) from 2007 to 2016. All PCMH patients possessing at least 1 abnormal liver test (total bilirubin, aminotransferases and alkaline phosphatase) were included. Patients were followed from the index abnormal liver chemistry until the next liver test result, or the end of the study period. The primary predictor variable of interest was the number of abnormal chemistries (out of 4) on index testing. Demographic and clinical variables served as other potential predictors of outcome. A Cox proportional hazards model was applied to investigate associations between the predictor variables and the time to repeat liver chemistry testing.
RESULTS: Of 9,545 patients with at least 2 PCMH visits and 1 liver test abnormality, 6,489 (68%) obtained repeat testing within 1 year, and 80% of patients had follow-up tests within 2 years. Patients with multiple abnormal liver tests and those with higher degrees of abnormality were associated with shorter time to repeat testing.
CONCLUSIONS: A large proportion of patients with abnormal liver tests still lack repeat testing at 1 year. The number of liver abnormal liver tests and degree of elevation were inversely associated with the time to repeat testing.
Copyright © 2019 Southern Society for Clinical Investigation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Diagnosis; Electronic health record; Liver disease; Liver function tests; Quality

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31331450      PMCID: PMC6658090          DOI: 10.1016/j.amjms.2019.04.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med Sci        ISSN: 0002-9629            Impact factor:   2.378


  24 in total

1.  Assessing validity of ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 administrative data in recording clinical conditions in a unique dually coded database.

Authors:  Hude Quan; Bing Li; L Duncan Saunders; Gerry A Parsons; Carolyn I Nilsson; Arif Alibhai; William A Ghali
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 2.  The diagnosis and management of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: Practice guidance from the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.

Authors:  Naga Chalasani; Zobair Younossi; Joel E Lavine; Michael Charlton; Kenneth Cusi; Mary Rinella; Stephen A Harrison; Elizabeth M Brunt; Arun J Sanyal
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2017-09-29       Impact factor: 17.425

Review 3.  Diagnosis and monitoring of hepatic injury. I. Performance characteristics of laboratory tests.

Authors:  D R Dufour; J A Lott; F S Nolte; D R Gretch; R S Koff; L B Seeff
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 8.327

4.  Evaluation of liver test abnormalities in a patient-centered medical home: do liver test patterns matter?

Authors:  Andrew D Schreiner; William P Moran; Jingwen Zhang; Elizabeth B Kirkland; Marc E Heincelman; Samuel O Schumann Iii; Patrick D Mauldin; Don C Rockey
Journal:  J Investig Med       Date:  2018-06-25       Impact factor: 2.895

5.  Assessing the Burden of Abnormal LFTs and the Role of the Electronic Health Record: A Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Andrew D Schreiner; Patrick D Mauldin; William P Moran; Valerie Durkalski-Mauldin; Jingwen Zhang; Samuel O Schumann; Marc E Heincelman; Justin Marsden; Don C Rockey
Journal:  Am J Med Sci       Date:  2018-02-09       Impact factor: 2.378

6.  ACG Clinical Guideline: Evaluation of Abnormal Liver Chemistries.

Authors:  Paul Y Kwo; Stanley M Cohen; Joseph K Lim
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-12-20       Impact factor: 10.864

7.  The asymptomatic outpatient with abnormal liver function tests.

Authors:  Michael Krier; Aijaz Ahmed
Journal:  Clin Liver Dis       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 6.126

8.  Elevated liver enzyme activity in construction workers: prevalence and impact on early retirement and all-cause mortality.

Authors:  V Arndt; H Brenner; D Rothenbacher; B Zschenderlein; E Fraisse; T M Fliedner
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 3.015

9.  Normal serum aminotransferase concentration and risk of mortality from liver diseases: prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Hyeon Chang Kim; Chung Mo Nam; Sun Ha Jee; Kwang Hyub Han; Dae Kyu Oh; Il Suh
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-03-17

10.  Development of a decision support tool to facilitate primary care management of patients with abnormal liver function tests without clinically apparent liver disease [HTA03/38/02]. Abnormal Liver Function Investigations Evaluation (ALFIE).

Authors:  Peter T Donnan; David McLernon; Douglas Steinke; Stephen Ryder; Paul Roderick; Frank M Sullivan; William Rosenberg; John F Dillon
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2007-04-16       Impact factor: 2.655

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.