Literature DB >> 29673744

Assessing the Burden of Abnormal LFTs and the Role of the Electronic Health Record: A Retrospective Study.

Andrew D Schreiner1, Patrick D Mauldin2, William P Moran2, Valerie Durkalski-Mauldin2, Jingwen Zhang2, Samuel O Schumann2, Marc E Heincelman2, Justin Marsden2, Don C Rockey2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Primary care clinicians encounter abnormal liver function tests (LFTs) frequently. This study assesses the prevalence of abnormal LFTs and patient follow-up patterns in response.
METHODS: This is a retrospective study from 2007-2016 of adult patients with abnormal LFTs seen in an internal medicine clinic. The proportion of patients with follow-up testing and the time (in days) to repeat LFTs were the primary outcomes measured. Results were evaluated before and after the implementation of the institution's electronic health record (EHR).
RESULTS: This study identified a period prevalence for abnormal LFTs of 39%. Of these, 9,545 unique patients met inclusion criteria, with 8,415 patients (88.2%) possessing follow-up LFTs and no significant difference in the proportion of patients receiving follow-up by degree of initial abnormality. Median time to follow-up in mild abnormalities (1-2 times normal) was 138 days, compared to 21 days for severe abnormalities (>4 times normal, P < 0.0001). Reduced time to repeat testing across all spectrums of abnormality was observed following EHR implementation, but proportions of missing follow-up did not improve. A multivariable logistic regression model identified younger age, poverty, living over 50 miles from clinic, recent cohort entry and a lower magnitude of abnormality as predictors for missing repeat LFT testing (area under the curve = 0.838 [95% CI: 0.827-0.849]).
CONCLUSIONS: Abnormal LFTs were detected in 39% of all patients seen. The degree of LFT abnormality did not influence rates of follow-up testing, but does appear to play a role in the timing of repeat testing, when obtained. Follow-up rates did not improve with EHR implementation.
Copyright © 2018 Southern Society for Clinical Investigation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Abnormal liver tests; Health services research; Primary care

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29673744     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjms.2018.02.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med Sci        ISSN: 0002-9629            Impact factor:   2.378


  3 in total

1.  The Association of Abnormal Liver Tests with Hepatitis C Testing in Primary Care.

Authors:  Andrew D Schreiner; John Bian; Jingwen Zhang; Z Merle Haulsee; Justin Marsden; Valerie Durkalski-Mauldin; Patrick D Mauldin; William P Moran; Don C Rockey
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2019-07-29       Impact factor: 4.965

2.  When Do Clinicians Follow-up Abnormal Liver Tests in Primary Care?

Authors:  Andrew D Schreiner; John Bian; Jingwen Zhang; Elizabeth B Kirkland; Marc E Heincelman; Samuel O Schumann; Patrick D Mauldin; William P Moran; Don C Rockey
Journal:  Am J Med Sci       Date:  2019-04-20       Impact factor: 2.378

3.  The Association of Fibrosis-4 Index Scores with Severe Liver Outcomes in Primary Care.

Authors:  Andrew D Schreiner; William P Moran; Jingwen Zhang; Sherry Livingston; Justin Marsden; Patrick D Mauldin; David Koch; Mulugeta Gebregziabher
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2022-01-19       Impact factor: 6.473

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.