| Literature DB >> 31330950 |
Fulufhelo P Makumbele1, Malcolm Taylor2, Marietjie Stander2, Tonna A Anyasi1, Afam I O Jideani3.
Abstract
Wildly grown in most regions of the world, Carissa edulis is a highly underutilised fruit with significant antioxidant characteristics. The phyto and physicochemical properties of C. edulis berries at different stages of ripening are evaluated in this work. Total flavonoids (TF), total phenolic content (TPC) and antioxidant activity were determined spectrophotometrically, while concentration of polyphenols was determined using liquid chromatography coupled to diode array detection and electrospray ionization mass spectrometry. Results showed that antioxidant activity was lowest (18.36 ± 0.12 mg TE/g) in RS3 and decreased with TPC upon increased ripening. Conversely, TF increased with ripening progression with TF found to be highest in RS3 (5.92 ± 0.03 mg CE/g). Identified phenolic acids in C. edulis were quinic acid, protocatechuoyl-hexose, neochlorogenic acid, chlorogenic acid, cryptochlorogenic acid and dicaffeoylquinic acid. Identified flavonoids included rutin, catechin, procyanidin dimer, procyanidin trimer, quercetin-3-O-glucosyl-xyloside, quercetin-3-O-robinobioside, quercetin-3-O-glucoside and quercetin-3-OH-3-methylglutaryl-glucoside. Physicochemical properties of C. edulis varied among samples with sugar/acid ratio of C. edulis ranging from 25.70 for RS1 to 50.36 for RS3. Ripening stage of C. edulis undoubtedly affects the phyto and physicochemical properties of C. edulis.Entities:
Keywords: Carissa edulis; antioxidant activity; free radicals; physicochemical properties; phytochemicals; ripening stage
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31330950 PMCID: PMC6680874 DOI: 10.3390/molecules24142630
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1Carissa edulis fruits at different ripening stages used for the study. (a) First stage of ripening; (b) second stage of ripening and (c) last stage of ripening. Source: Makumbele [4].
pH, total acidity and total soluble solids of Carissa edulis fruit samples.
| Samples | pH | TTA (g/100 mL) | TSS (oBrix) | TSS/TTA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RS1 | 2.85 ± 0.04 a | 0.37 ± 0.01 c | 9.51 ± 0.21 a | 26.03 |
| RS2 | 2.91 ± 0.01 a | 0.35 ± 0.01 c | 11.12 ± 0.08 b | 31.95 |
| RS3 | 3.10 ± 0.01 b | 0.27 ± 0.02 b | 13.51 ± 0.21 d | 50.36 |
| SR | 3.32 ± 0.07 c | 0.21 ± 0.02 a | 13.14 ± 0.07 c | 61.55 |
Means in the same column with the same superscript letter (a, b, c, d) are not significantly different (p > 0.05). RS1 = first stage of ripening of C. edulis fruit; RS2 = second stage of ripening of C. edulis fruit; RS3 = third stage of ripening of C. edulis fruit; SR = standard reference sample (commercial blueberries); pH = potentia hydrogenii; TTA = total titratable acid; oBrix = soluble solids; TSS/TTA = sugar/acid ratio. Values are means ± standard deviation (n = 3).
Figure 2CIELAB colour properties of Carissa edulis fruit samples. RS1, first stage of ripening of C. edulis; RS2, second stage of ripening of C. edulis berries; RS3, third stage of ripening of C. edulis berries; SR, standard reference sample (commercial blueberries); L*, lightness of samples; a*, redness when positive and greenness when negative; b*, yellow when positive and blue when negative. Error bars are standard deviation of mean values (n = 3).
Total phenolic and flavonoid content of Carissa edulis fruit samples.
| Samples | TPC (mg GAE/g) | TFC (mg CE/g) | DPPH (mmol TE/g) |
|---|---|---|---|
| RS1 | 6.81 ± 0.02 b | 5.09 ± 0.04 b | 20.24 ± 0.27 c |
| RS2 | 5.90 ± 0.41 a | 5.92 ± 0.03 b | 19.09 ± 0.02 b |
| RS3 | 6.71 ± 0.13 c | 5.95 ± 0.76 a | 18.36 ± 0.12 a |
| SR | 7.21 ± 0.23 c | 6.31 ± 0.27 b | 20.26 ± 0.56 c |
Means in the same column with the same superscript letter (a, b, c) are not significantly different (p > 0.05) for C. edulis. RS1 = first stage of ripening of C. edulis; RS2 = second stage of ripening of C. edulis; RS3 = third stage of ripening of C. edulis; SR = standard reference sample (commercial blueberries); TFC = total flavonoids content; TPC = total phenolic content; DPPH = 2,2 diphenyl-1-picryl-hydrazyl; GAE = gallic acid equivalent; CE = catechin equivalent. Values are means ± standard deviation (n = 3).
Figure 3TIC chromatograms of Carissa edulis fruit samples at ripening stage 1. (A) Zoomed in chromatogram > 4 min; (B) full chromatogram.
Figure 4Comparison of TIC chromatograms at different ripening stage: (A) Ripening stage 1 (RS1) and (B) ripening stage 2 (RS2) (MSE F1: low-energy CID).
Compounds identification in Carissa edulis fruit.
| Peak No. | Rt (min) | [M − H]− ( | [M − H]− Formula | Error (ppm) | MSE Fragments ( | UV (nm) | Tentative Identification | Classification |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 1.16 | 191.0539 | C7H11O6 | 2.6 | 85 | 264 | Quinic acid | Phenolic acids (Cyclic polyol) |
|
| 2.17 | 191.0181 | C6H7O7 | 0.6 | 155, 127, 111 | 280 | Citric acid | Organic acid |
|
| 4.35 | 309.1188 | C12H22O9 | −1.0 | 309, 129 | Weak | Unknown | |
|
| 6.56 | 315.0715 | C13H15O9 | −0.3 | 153, 109 | 306 | Protocatechuoyl-hexose | Phenolic acids |
|
| 6.75 | 353.0854 | C16H17O9 | 1.7 | 191, 179, 135 | 325 | Neochlorogenic acid (3CQA) | Phenolic acids |
|
| 8.09 | 175.0605 | C7H11O5 | −2.9 | 115 | Weak | Unknown | |
|
| 8.65 | 353.0876 | C16H17O9 | −2.5 | 191 | 325 | Chlorogenic acid (5CQA) | Phenolic acids |
|
| 9.10 | 353.0886 | C16H17O9 | 0.8 | 191, 179, 173, 135 | 325 | Cryptochlorogenic acid (4CQA) | Phenolic acids |
|
| 9.56 | 577.1357 | C30H25O12 | 2.6 | 407, 289 | 279 | Procyanidin dimer | Flavonoid (Proanthocyanidin/condensed tannin) |
|
| 10.26 | 289.0695 | C15H13O6 | 1.7 | 245, 203, 179, 137, 125 | 278 | Catechin | Flavonoid (Flavan-3-ol) |
|
| 10.93 | 439.1859 | C18H31O12 | −1.8 | 408, 289, 161, 125 | 278 | Unknown | |
|
| 11.21 | 865.1946 | C45H37O18 | −3.9 | 695, 575, 407, 289, 161 | 278 | Procyanidin trimer | Flavonoid (Proanthocyanidin/condensed tannin) |
|
| 12.75 | 595.132 | C26H27O16 | 3.5 | 300, 271, 255 | 349 | Quercetin-3- | Flavonoid (Flavonol-glycoside) |
|
| 13.44 | 609.1467 | C27H29O16 | 3.8 | 301, 300, 271, 255 | 351 | Quercetin-3- | Flavonoid (Flavonol-glycoside) |
|
| 13.75 | 609.147 | C27H29O16 | 2.6 | 301, 300, 271, 255 | 351 | Quercetin-3- | Flavonoid (Flavonol-glycoside) |
|
| 14.06 | 463.0867 | C21H19O12 | 0.4 | 300, 271, 255 | 353 | Quercetin-3- | Flavonoid (Flavonol-glycoside) |
|
| 15.24 | 607.1327 | C27H27O16 | −0.5 | 505, 463, 300, 271 | 351 | Quercetin-3-OH-3-methylglutaryl-glucoside | Flavonoid (Flavonol-glycoside) |
|
| 16.82 | 515.1204 | C25H23O12 | 2.7 | 191, 179, 173, 135 | 329 | Dicaffeoylquinic acid | Phenolic acids |
|
| 17.61 | 1381.4824 | C60H85O36 | −0.3 | 869, 827, 511, 409 | 277 | Unknown |
Rt, retention time.
Figure 5Compounds present in Carissa edulis fruit. (A) Identified compounds in C. edulis fruit; (B) polyphenolic content of Carissa edulis fruit. RS1, first stage of ripening of C. edulis; RS2, second stage of ripening of C. edulis berries; QA, quinic acid; CA, citric acid; Cat, catechin; Un1, unknown compound 1; Pro, protocatechuoyl-hexose; Neo, neochlorogenic acid; Chlo, chlorogenic acid; Cryp, cryptochlorogenic acid; Un2, unknown compound 2; ProcyD, procyanidin dimer; ProcyT, procyanidin trimer; QueG, quercetin-3-O-glucosyl xyloside; QueR, quercetin-3-O-robinobioside; Isoq, isoquercitrin (quercetin-3-O-glucoside); QueM, quercetin-3-OH-3-methylglutaryl-glucoside; Dicaff, dicaffeoylquinic acid; and Un3, unknown compound 3. Error bars are standard deviation of mean values (n = 3).