Literature DB >> 31330150

Quantitative assessment of the conjunctival microcirculation using a smartphone and slit-lamp biomicroscope.

Paul F Brennan1, Andrew J McNeil2, Min Jing3, Agnes Awuah4, Dewar D Finlay5, Kevin Blighe6, James A D McLaughlin7, Ruixuan Wang8, Jonathan Moore9, M Andrew Nesbit10, Emanuele Trucco11, Mark S Spence12, Tara C B Moore13.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The conjunctival microcirculation is a readily-accessible vascular bed for quantitative haemodynamic assessment and has been studied previously using a digital charge-coupled device (CCD). Smartphone video imaging of the conjunctiva, and haemodynamic parameter quantification, represents a novel approach. We report the feasibility of smartphone video acquisition and subsequent haemodynamic measure quantification via semi-automated means.
METHODS: Using an Apple iPhone 6 s and a Topcon SL-D4 slit-lamp biomicroscope, we obtained videos of the conjunctival microcirculation in 4 fields of view per patient, for 17 low cardiovascular risk patients. After image registration and processing, we quantified the diameter, mean axial velocity, mean blood volume flow, and wall shear rate for each vessel studied. Vessels were grouped into quartiles based on their diameter i.e. group 1 (<11 μm), 2 (11-16 μm), 3 (16-22 μm) and 4 (>22 μm).
RESULTS: From the 17 healthy controls (mean QRISK3 6.6%), we obtained quantifiable haemodynamics from 626 vessel segments. The mean diameter of microvessels, across all sites, was 21.1μm (range 5.8-58 μm). Mean axial velocity was 0.50mm/s (range 0.11-1mm/s) and there was a modestly positive correlation (r 0.322) seen with increasing diameter, best appreciated when comparing group 4 to the remaining groups (p < .0001). Blood volume flow (mean 145.61pl/s, range 7.05-1178.81pl/s) was strongly correlated with increasing diameter (r 0.943, p < .0001) and wall shear rate (mean 157.31 s-1, range 37.37-841.66 s-1) negatively correlated with increasing diameter (r - 0.703, p < .0001).
CONCLUSIONS: We, for the first time, report the successful assessment and quantification of the conjunctival microcirculatory haemodynamics using a smartphone-based system.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Conjunctival circulation; Endothelial dysfunction; Haemodynamic assessment; Microcirculation; Smartphone

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31330150     DOI: 10.1016/j.mvr.2019.103907

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Microvasc Res        ISSN: 0026-2862            Impact factor:   3.514


  4 in total

1.  Slit lamp polarized dermoscopy: a cost-effective tool to assess eyelid lesions.

Authors:  Fábio Henrique Luiz Leonardo; Midori Hentona Osaki; Débora Fernandes Biazim; Yara Martins Ortigosa Leonardo; Tammy Hentona Osaki
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-09-09       Impact factor: 2.029

2.  A novel algorithm for cardiovascular screening using conjunctival microcirculatory parameters and blood biomarkers.

Authors:  Agnes Awuah; Julie S Moore; M Andrew Nesbit; Mark W Ruddock; Paul F Brennan; Jonathan A Mailey; Andrew J McNeil; Min Jing; Dewar D Finlay; Emanuele Trucco; Mary Jo Kurth; Joanne Watt; John V Lamont; Peter Fitzgerald; Mark S Spence; James A D McLaughlin; Tara C B Moore
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-04-21       Impact factor: 4.996

3.  Assessing the subjective quality of smartphone anterior segment photography: a non-inferiority study.

Authors:  Raghav Goel; Carmelo Macri; Bobak Bahrami; Robert Casson; Weng Onn Chan
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-08-26       Impact factor: 2.029

4.  Quantification of Blood Flow Velocity in the Human Conjunctival Microvessels Using Deep Learning-Based Stabilization Algorithm.

Authors:  Hang-Chan Jo; Hyeonwoo Jeong; Junhyuk Lee; Kyung-Sun Na; Dae-Yu Kim
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-06       Impact factor: 3.576

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.