| Literature DB >> 31329841 |
Peter Agger1, Janus Adler Hyldebrandt2,3, Esben Søvsø Szocska Hansen4, Camilla Omann5, Nikolaj Bøgh4, Farhad Waziri5, Per Mose Nielsen4, Christoffer Laustsen4.
Abstract
AIMS: Early detection of heart failure is important for timely treatment. During the development of heart failure, adaptive intracellular metabolic processes that evolve prior to macro-anatomic remodelling, could provide an early signal of impending failure. We hypothesized that metabolic imaging with hyperpolarized magnetic resonance would detect the early development of heart failure before conventional echocardiography could reveal cardiac dysfunction. METHODS ANDEntities:
Keywords: Metabolism; congenital heart disease; heart failure; magnetic resonance imaging
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 31329841 PMCID: PMC6923679 DOI: 10.1093/ehjci/jez074
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging ISSN: 2047-2404 Impact factor: 6.875
Conductance catheter assessment at 16 weeks
| PB | Control |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Morphometric and haemodynamic indices | |||
| Number of animals ( | 5 | 6 | |
| Weight (kg) | 37.9 (4.5) | 37.7 (0.9) | NS |
| Body surface area (m2) | 0.80 (0.06) | 0.79 (0.01) | NS |
| Heart rate (bpm) | 71 (8.4) | 81 (10.5) | NS |
| Stroke volume (mL/m2) | 50.4 (10.2) | 60.7 (5.4) | NS |
| Cardiac index (L/min/m2) | 2.8 (0.5) | 3.9 (0.8) |
|
| Ventricular volumes | |||
| RV EDV (mL/m2) | 71 (12.6) | 91.6 (12.5) |
|
| RV ESV (mL/m2) | 41 (12.6) | 55 (12.5) | NS |
| LV EDV (mL/m2) | 48.5 (7.8) | 82 (6.9) |
|
| LV ESV (mL/m2) | 20.2 (3.7) | 49.5 (6.5) |
|
| RV ejection fraction (%) | 56.5 (10.3) | 50.9 (9.6) | NS |
| LV ejection fraction (%) | 71.2 (8.4) | 56.8 (4.5) |
|
| Systolic indices | |||
| RV PRSW (mmHg ⋅ mL ⋅ mL−1) | 15.5 (5.3) | 8 (4) |
|
| RV | 543 (53) | 399 (87) |
|
| RV ESPVR (mmHg ⋅ mL) | 1.1 (0.6) | 0.34 (0.05) |
|
| RV Pmax (mmHg) | 43.9 (9.4) | 27.3 (1.5) |
|
| RV Ea (mmHg/mL) | 1.28 (0.4) | 0.6 (0.1) |
|
| RV Ea/ESPVR ratio | 1.4 (0.4) | 1.9 (0.5) | NS |
| LV PRSW (mmHg ⋅ mL ⋅ mL−1) | 42.8 (10.9) | 42.5 (3.6) | NS |
| LV | 1411 (316) | 1094 (290) | NS |
| LV ESPVR (mmHg ⋅ mL) | 1.2 (0.4) | 1.0 (0.11) | NS |
| LV Pmax (mmHg) | 80.4 (6.7) | 84.9 (4.5) | NS |
| LV Ea (mmHg/mL) | 2.0 (0.7) | 1.7 (0.2) | NS |
| LV Ea/ESPVR ratio | 1.7 (0.5) | 1.76 (0.4) | NS |
| Diastolic indices | |||
| RV tau (ms) | 74.2 (18.8) | 64.1 (10) | NS |
| RV EDPVR (mmHg/mL) | 0.14 (0.05) | 0.16 (0.05) | NS |
| LV tau (ms) | 61.9 (13.7) | 46.4 (5.5) |
|
| LV EDPVR (mmHg/mL) | 0.22 (0.04) | 0.17 (0.02) |
|
Data are presented as means (standard deviation). Means compared using Student’s t-test.
Bold face emphasizes statistical significance.
Ea, arterial elastance; EDV, end-diastolic volume; EDPVR, end-diastolic pressure–volume relation; ESPVR, end-systolic pressure–volume relation; ESV, end-systolic volume; LV, left ventricle; NS, statistically non-significant; P, pressure; PB, pulmonary banding; PRSW, preload recruitable stroke work; RV, right ventricle.
Biochemical assessment at 16 weeks
| Biochemical indices | PB | Control |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Arterial blood samples | |||
| pH | 7.51 (0.05) | 7.52 (0.03) | NS |
| pCO2 (kPa) | 5.5 (0.8) | 5.5 (0.5) | NS |
| pO2 (kPa) | 28.0 (13.5) | 16.4 (3.2) | NS |
| Sat O2 (%) | 100 (0.6) | 99 (1.4) | NS |
| Base excess (mmol/L) | 10.2 (2.0) | 10.1 (1.2) | NS |
| Bicarbonate (mmol/L) | 33.2 (1.8) | 32.8 (0.7) | NS |
| Venous blood samples | |||
| Glucose (mmol/L) | 3.8 (1.5) | 5.1 (0.9) | NS |
| Lactate (ng/µL) | 154.4 (103.1) | 148.4 (49.3) | NS |
| Pyruvate (ng/µL) | 66.6 (13.4) | 115.5 (32.5) |
|
| Fumarase activity (nmol/min/µL) | 1.9 (0.25) | 1.9 (0.11) | NS |
| NT-ProBNP (pg/mL) | 19.3 (8.9) | 6.3 (7.0) |
|
Data are presented as means (standard deviation). Means compared using Student’s t-test.
Bold face emphasizes statistical significance.
NS, statistically non-significant; NT-ProBNP, N-terminal of the pro-hormone brain natriuretic peptide; PB, pulmonary banding.