| Literature DB >> 31327875 |
Christina M Gibson-Davis1, Corey Vernot1, Maggie Butler1, Natalie Hall1, Lauren Taylor1, Katherine Eastwood1, Xinri Zhang1.
Abstract
This study examined effects of local economic conditions on individuals' attitudes toward midpregnancy marriages using an experimental vignette method. Adults (N = 460) were each shown two vignettes about a hypothetical couple expecting a baby; within each vignette pair, vignettes randomly varied as to whether the couple lived in a community that had recently experienced job losses or had stable employment. Respondents indicated if the couple should and will get married before the baby's birth. Results showed that worse local economic conditions led people to believe that marriage would be less common. Among more socio-economically disadvantaged respondents, if the hypothetical couple lived in a community with job loss, fewer respondents also thought that the couple should marry. In contrast, among more socioeconomically advantaged respondents, slightly more respondents thought that the couple should marry. When economic conditions worsen, low-socioeconomic-status individuals may believe that financial prerequisites for marriage become harder to meet.Entities:
Keywords: economic well-being; low-income families; marriage; unemployment
Year: 2016 PMID: 31327875 PMCID: PMC6640869 DOI: 10.1111/jomf.12379
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Marriage Fam ISSN: 0022-2445