Literature DB >> 16809588

Effect of increased social unacceptability of cigarette smoking on reduction in cigarette consumption.

Benjamin Alamar1, Stanton A Glantz.   

Abstract

Taxes on cigarettes have long been used to help reduce cigarette consumption. Social factors also affect cigarette consumption, but this impact has not been quantified. We computed a social unacceptability index based on individuals' responses to questions regarding locations where smoking should be allowed. A regression analysis showed that the social unacceptability index and price had similar elasticities and that their effects were independent of each other. If, through an active tobacco control campaign, the average individual's views on the social unacceptability of smoking changed to more closely resemble the views of California residents, there would be a 15% drop in cigarette consumption, equivalent to a 1.17 dollars increase in the excise tax on cigarettes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16809588      PMCID: PMC1522108          DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2005.069617

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   9.308


  6 in total

1.  msJAMA: reducing smoking prevalence to 10% in five years.

Authors:  A Bitton; C Fichtenberg; S Glantz
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2001-12-05       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 2.  Effect of smoke-free workplaces on smoking behaviour: systematic review.

Authors:  Caroline M Fichtenberg; Stanton A Glantz
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-07-27

3.  Individual cigarette consumption and addiction: a flexible limited dependent variable approach.

Authors:  S T Yen; A M Jones
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  1996 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.046

Review 4.  Tobacco industry research on smoking cessation. Recapturing young adults and other recent quitters.

Authors:  Pamela M Ling; Stanton A Glantz
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Using tobacco-industry marketing research to design more effective tobacco-control campaigns.

Authors:  Pamela M Ling; Stanton A Glantz
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2002-06-12       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Changes in population attitudes about where smoking should not be allowed: California versus the rest of the USA.

Authors:  E A Gilpin; L Lee; J P Pierce
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 7.552

  6 in total
  69 in total

1.  Smoking behaviour and attitudes of Hungarian Roma and non-Roma population towards tobacco control policies.

Authors:  Edit Paulik; László Nagymajtényi; Douglas Easterling; Todd Rogers
Journal:  Int J Public Health       Date:  2011-04-22       Impact factor: 3.380

2.  Policy support, norms, and secondhand smoke exposure before and after implementation of a comprehensive smoke-free law in Mexico city.

Authors:  James F Thrasher; Rosaura Pérez-Hernández; Kamala Swayampakala; Edna Arillo-Santillán; Matteo Bottai
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2010-05-13       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Evaluation of a social marketing campaign to support Mexico City's comprehensive smoke-free law.

Authors:  James F Thrasher; Liling Huang; Rosaura Pérez-Hernández; Jeff Niederdeppe; Edna Arillo-Santillán; Jorge Alday
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2010-12-16       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Smoking on both sides of the pacific: home smoking restrictions and secondhand smoke exposure among Korean adults and children in Seoul and California.

Authors:  John W Ayers; C Richard Hofstetter; Suzanne C Hughes; Haeryun Park; Hee-Young Paik; Veronica L Irvin; Jooeun Lee; Hee-Soon Juon; Carl Latkin; Melbourne F Hovell
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2010-10-05       Impact factor: 4.244

5.  Secular versus religious norms against smoking: which is more important as a driver of quitting behaviour among Muslim Malaysian and Buddhist Thai smokers?

Authors:  Hua-Hie Yong; Steven Savvas; Ron Borland; James Thrasher; Buppha Sirirassamee; Maizurah Omar
Journal:  Int J Behav Med       Date:  2013-06

6.  Compliance and support for bans on smoking in licensed venues in Australia: findings from the International Tobacco Control Four-Country Survey.

Authors:  Jae Cooper; Ron Borland; Hua-Hie Yong; Andrew Hyland
Journal:  Aust N Z J Public Health       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 2.939

7.  'Acceptable rebellion': marketing hipster aesthetics to sell Camel cigarettes in the US.

Authors:  Yogi Hendlin; Stacey J Anderson; Stanton A Glantz
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 7.552

8.  Smoking Norms and the Regulation of E-Cigarettes.

Authors:  Kristin Voigt
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2015-08-13       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 9.  Evidence, ethics, hubris and the future of second-hand smoke policy.

Authors:  Simon Chapman
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 7.552

10.  Vaping on Instagram: cloud chasing, hand checks and product placement.

Authors:  Kar-Hai Chu; Jon-Patrick Allem; Tess Boley Cruz; Jennifer B Unger
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2016-09-22       Impact factor: 7.552

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.