Literature DB >> 31324532

Replication fidelity in E. coli: Differential leading and lagging strand effects for dnaE antimutator alleles.

Karolina Makiela-Dzbenska1, Katarzyna H Maslowska1, Wojciech Kuban1, Damian Gawel1, Piotr Jonczyk1, Roel M Schaaper2, Iwona J Fijalkowska3.   

Abstract

DNA Pol III holoenzyme (HE) is the major DNA replicase of Escherichia coli. It is a highly accurate enzyme responsible for simultaneously replicating the leading- and lagging DNA strands. Interestingly, the fidelity of replication for the two DNA strands is unequal, with a higher accuracy for lagging-strand replication. We have previously proposed this higher lagging-strand fidelity results from the more dissociative character of the lagging-strand polymerase. In support of this hypothesis, an E. coli mutant carrying a catalytic DNA polymerase subunit (DnaE915) characterized by decreased processivity yielded an antimutator phenotype (higher fidelity). The present work was undertaken to gain deeper insight into the factors that influence the fidelity of chromosomal DNA replication in E. coli. We used three different dnaE alleles (dnaE915, dnaE911, and dnaE941) that had previously been isolated as antimutators. We confirmed that each of the three dnaE alleles produced significant antimutator effects, but in addition showed that these antimutator effects proved largest for the normally less accurate leading strand. Additionally, in the presence of error-prone DNA polymerases, each of the three dnaE antimutator strains turned into mutators. The combined observations are fully supportive of our model in which the dissociative character of the DNA polymerase is an important determinant of in vivo replication fidelity. In this model, increased dissociation from terminal mismatches (i.e., potential mutations) leads to removal of the mismatches (antimutator effect), but in the presence of error-prone (or translesion) DNA polymerases the abandoned terminal mismatches become targets for error-prone extension (mutator effect). We also propose that these dnaE alleles are promising tools for studying polymerase exchanges at the replication fork.
Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Antimutators; DNA Pol III HE; DnaE915; Leading and lagging strand; Replication fidelity

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31324532      PMCID: PMC6801068          DOI: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2019.102643

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)        ISSN: 1568-7856


  55 in total

Review 1.  DNA replication fidelity in Escherichia coli: a multi-DNA polymerase affair.

Authors:  Iwona J Fijalkowska; Roel M Schaaper; Piotr Jonczyk
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Rev       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 16.408

2.  Polymerases leave fingerprints: analysis of the mutational spectrum in Escherichia coli rpoB to assess the role of polymerase IV in spontaneous mutation.

Authors:  Erika Wolff; Mandy Kim; Kaibin Hu; Hanjing Yang; Jeffrey H Miller
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 3.490

3.  Genetic requirements and mutational specificity of the Escherichia coli SOS mutator activity.

Authors:  I J Fijalkowska; R L Dunn; R M Schaaper
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 3.490

4.  DNA Polymerase III, but Not Polymerase IV, Must Be Bound to a τ-Containing DnaX Complex to Enable Exchange into Replication Forks.

Authors:  Quan Yuan; Paul R Dohrmann; Mark D Sutton; Charles S McHenry
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2016-04-07       Impact factor: 5.157

5.  Spontaneous mutation in Escherichia coli containing the dnaE911 DNA polymerase antimutator allele.

Authors:  A R Oller; R M Schaaper
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  SOS mutator activity: unequal mutagenesis on leading and lagging strands.

Authors:  M Maliszewska-Tkaczyk; P Jonczyk; M Bialoskorska; R M Schaaper; I J Fijalkowska
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-11-07       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  DNA polymerase II as a fidelity factor in chromosomal DNA synthesis in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Magdalena Banach-Orlowska; Iwona J Fijalkowska; Roel M Schaaper; Piotr Jonczyk
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.501

8.  Involvement of Escherichia coli DNA polymerase II in response to oxidative damage and adaptive mutation.

Authors:  M Escarceller; J Hicks; G Gudmundsson; G Trump; D Touati; S Lovett; P L Foster; K McEntee; M F Goodman
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 3.490

9.  Effect of dNTP pool alterations on fidelity of leading and lagging strand DNA replication in E. coli.

Authors:  Damian Gawel; Iwona J Fijalkowska; Piotr Jonczyk; Roel M Schaaper
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2013-11-22       Impact factor: 2.433

10.  Single-molecule visualization of fast polymerase turnover in the bacterial replisome.

Authors:  Jacob S Lewis; Lisanne M Spenkelink; Slobodan Jergic; Elizabeth A Wood; Enrico Monachino; Nicholas P Horan; Karl E Duderstadt; Michael M Cox; Andrew Robinson; Nicholas E Dixon; Antoine M van Oijen
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2017-04-22       Impact factor: 8.140

View more
  2 in total

1.  Effect of mismatch repair on the mutational footprint of the bacterial SOS mutator activity.

Authors:  Elizabeth B Lewis; Rachana Mudipalli; Mitra M Eghbal; Matthew J Culyba
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2021-05-09

2.  Novel Escherichia coli active site dnaE alleles with altered base and sugar selectivity.

Authors:  Alexandra Vaisman; Krystian Łazowski; Martin A M Reijns; Erin Walsh; John P McDonald; Kristiniana C Moreno; Dominic R Quiros; Marlen Schmidt; Harald Kranz; Wei Yang; Karolina Makiela-Dzbenska; Roger Woodgate
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  2021-07-31       Impact factor: 3.979

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.