Literature DB >> 31323455

Financial strain and ideal cardiovascular health in middle-aged and older women: Data from the Women's health study.

Tomás Cabeza de Baca1, Melissa S Burroughs Peña2, Natalie Slopen3, David Williams4, Julie Buring5, Michelle A Albert6.   

Abstract

Financial strain is a prevalent form of psychosocial stress in the United States; however, information about the relationship between financial strain and cardiovascular health remains sparse, particularly in older women.
METHODS: The cross-sectional association between financial strain and ideal cardiovascular health were examined in the Women's Health Study follow-up cohort (N = 22,048; mean age = 72± 6.0 years).Six self-reported measures of financial strain were summed together to create a financial strain index and categorized into 4 groups: No financial strain, 1 stressor, 2 stressors, and 3+ stressors. Ideal cardiovascular health was based on the American Heart Association strategic 2020 goals metric, including tobacco use, body mass index, physical activity, diet, blood pressure, total cholesterol and diabetes mellitus. Cardiovascular health was examined as continuous and a categorical outcome (ideal, intermediate, and poor). Statistical analyses adjusted for age, race/ethnicity, education and income.
RESULTS: At least one indicator of financial strain was reported by 16% of participants. Number of financial stressors was associated with lower ideal cardiovascular health, and this association persisted after adjustment for potential confounders (1 financial stressor (FS): B = -0.10, 95% Confidence Intervals (CI) = -0.13, -0.07; 2 FS: B = -0.20, 95% CI = -0.26, -0.15; 3+ FS: B = -0.44, 95% CI = -0.50, -0.38).
CONCLUSION: Financial strain was associated with lower ideal cardiovascular health in middle aged and older female health professional women. The results of this study have implications for the potential cardiovascular health benefit of financial protections for older individuals.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31323455      PMCID: PMC6698388          DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2019.06.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Heart J        ISSN: 0002-8703            Impact factor:   4.749


  50 in total

1.  Item response theory and health outcomes measurement in the 21st century.

Authors:  R D Hays; L S Morales; S P Reise
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 2.983

2.  Gender relations and economic issues.

Authors:  D Elson
Journal:  Focus Gend       Date:  1993-10

3.  Myocardial infarction and coronary death among women: psychosocial predictors from a 20-year follow-up of women in the Framingham Study.

Authors:  E D Eaker; J Pinsky; W P Castelli
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1992-04-15       Impact factor: 4.897

4.  C-reactive protein, interleukin 6, and risk of developing type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  A D Pradhan; J E Manson; N Rifai; J E Buring; P M Ridker
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2001-07-18       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 5.  The epidemiology, pathophysiology, and management of psychosocial risk factors in cardiac practice: the emerging field of behavioral cardiology.

Authors:  Alan Rozanski; James A Blumenthal; Karina W Davidson; Patrice G Saab; Laura Kubzansky
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2005-03-01       Impact factor: 24.094

6.  Baseline characteristics of participants in the Women's Health Study.

Authors:  K M Rexrode; I M Lee; N R Cook; C H Hennekens; J E Buring
Journal:  J Womens Health Gend Based Med       Date:  2000 Jan-Feb

7.  A prospective study of red meat consumption and type 2 diabetes in middle-aged and elderly women: the women's health study.

Authors:  Yiqing Song; JoAnn E Manson; Julie E Buring; Simin Liu
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 19.112

8.  Association of psychosocial risk factors with risk of acute myocardial infarction in 11119 cases and 13648 controls from 52 countries (the INTERHEART study): case-control study.

Authors:  Annika Rosengren; Steven Hawken; Stephanie Ounpuu; Karen Sliwa; Mohammad Zubaid; Wael A Almahmeed; Kathleen Ngu Blackett; Chitr Sitthi-amorn; Hiroshi Sato; Salim Yusuf
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2004 Sep 11-17       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Self-reported economic difficulties and coronary events in men: evidence from the Whitehall II study.

Authors:  J E Ferrie; P Martikainen; M J Shipley; M G Marmot
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2005-04-14       Impact factor: 7.196

10.  Job strain, job demands, decision latitude, and risk of coronary heart disease within the Whitehall II study.

Authors:  H Kuper; M Marmot
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 3.710

View more
  4 in total

1.  Do any kinds of perceived stressors lead to hypertension? A longitudinal cohort study.

Authors:  Hamidreza Roohafza; Niloofar Sattari; Fatemeh Nouri; Mohammad Talaei; Gholamreza Masoumi; Nizal Sarrafzadegan; Masoumeh Sadeghi
Journal:  Hypertens Res       Date:  2022-04-04       Impact factor: 3.872

2.  Lifetime Trauma and Cardiovascular Health in Latinas.

Authors:  Billy A Caceres; Danny Doan; Veronica Barcelona; Niurka Suero-Tejeda
Journal:  Nurs Res       Date:  2022 Jan-Feb 01       Impact factor: 2.381

3.  Social Role Stress, Reward, and the American Heart Association Life's Simple 7 in Midlife Women: The Study of Women's Health Across the Nation.

Authors:  Andrea L Stewart; Jared W Magnani; Emma Barinas-Mitchell; Karen A Matthews; Samar R El Khoudary; Elizabeth A Jackson; Maria M Brooks
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2020-12-11       Impact factor: 5.501

4.  The relationship between financial hardship and incident diabetic kidney disease in older US adults - a longitudinal study.

Authors:  Timothy R Corwin; Mukoso N Ozieh; Emma Garacci; Anna Palatnik; Leonard E Egede
Journal:  BMC Nephrol       Date:  2021-05-05       Impact factor: 2.388

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.