| Literature DB >> 31323023 |
Zhenpeng Cao1,2,3, Weijie Zeng1, Xiangqi Hao1, Junming Huang1,2,3, Mengkai Cai1,2,3, Pei Zhou1, Guihong Zhang1,2,3.
Abstract
Southern China is considered an important source of influenza virus pandemics because of the large, diverse viral reservoirs in poultry and swine. To examine the trend in influenza A virus of swine (IAV-S), an active surveillance program has been conducted from 2013 to 2015 in Guangdong, China. The phylogenetic analyses showed that the external genes of the isolates were assigned to the Eurasian avian-like swine (EA) H1N1 and/or human-like H3N2 lineages with multiple substitutions, indicating a notable genetic shift. Moreover, the internal genes derived from different origins (PB2, PB1, PA, NP: pdm/09 (pandemic influenza virus 2009)-origin, M: pdm/09- or EA-origin, NS: North American Triple Reassortant (TR)-origin have become the dominant backbone of IAV-S in southern China. According to the origins of the eight gene segments, the isolates can be categorized into five genotypes. The results of mice experiment showed that the YJ4 (genotype 1) and DG2 (genotype 4) are the most pathogenic to mice, and the viruses are observed in kidneys and brains, indicating the systemic infection. The alterations of the IAV-S gene composition supported the continued implementation of the intensive surveillance of IAV-S and the greater attention focused on potential shifts toward transmission to humans.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31323023 PMCID: PMC6641472 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0217607
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Novel reassortant viruses isolated in this study.
| Isolate | Abbreviation | Subtype | District | Source | Collection date | GISAID isolate_ID |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A/Swine/Guangdong/DL2/2013 | DL2 | H1N1 | Foshan | Farm | Jul. 17th, 2013 | EPI_ISL_249793 |
| A/Swine/Guangdong/CH7/2014 | CH7 | H1N2 | Guangzhou | Farm | Nov. 12th, 2014 | EPI_ISL_249794 |
| A/Swine/Guangdong/CH8/2014 | CH8 | H1N1 | Guangzhou | Farm | Nov. 12th, 2014 | EPI_ISL_249795 |
| A/Swine/Guangdong/EP/2014 | EP | H1N2 | Jiangmen | Farm | Dec. 3rd, 2014 | EPI_ISL_249796 |
| A/Swine/Guangdong/YJ4/2014 | YJ4 | H1N1 | Yangjiang | Farm | Dec. 26th, 2014 | EPI_ISL_249797 |
| A/Swine/Guangdong/YJ10/2014 | YJ10 | H1N1 | Yangjiang | Farm | Dec. 26th, 2014 | EPI_ISL_249798 |
| A/Swine/Guangdong/YJ23/2014 | YJ23 | H1N1 | Yangjiang | Farm | Dec. 26th, 2014 | EPI_ISL_249799 |
| A/Swine/Guangdong/YJ28/2014 | YJ28 | H1N2 | Yangjiang | Farm | Dec. 26th, 2014 | EPI_ISL_249800 |
| A/Swine/Guangdong/DG1/2015 | DG1 | H1N2 | Dongguan | Farm | Oct. 15th, 2015 | EPI_ISL_249801 |
| A/Swine/Guangdong/DG2/2015 | DG2 | H1N2 | Dongguan | Farm | Oct. 15th, 2015 | EPI_ISL_249810 |
| A/Swine/Guangdong/BRT15/2015 | BRT15 | H1N1 | Foshan | Farm | Oct. 25th, 2015 | EPI_ISL_249812 |
| A/Swine/Guangdong/FNPA/2015 | FNPA | H1N1 | Foshan | Abattoir | Dec. 18th, 2015 | EPI_ISL_249844 |
| A/Swine/Guangdong/FS4/2015 | FS4 | H3N2 | Foshan | Farm | Dec. 18th, 2015 | EPI_ISL_249845 |
| A/Swine/Guangdong/FSC17/2015 | FSC17 | H1N1 | Foshan | Abattoir | Dec. 18th, 2015 | EPI_ISL_249852 |
a District abbreviation: DL, Dali in Foshan; CH, Conghua in Guangzhou; EP, Enping in Jiangmen; YJ, Yangjiang; DG, Dongguan; NP, Nanping in Foshan.
b The soruce of the nasal swabs collected was commercial farm or abattoir.
c Sequence information was generated and deposited in GISAID.
Fig 1Genetic relationship of the H1- and H3- HA genes.
The novel viruses investigated in this study are indicated by red labels, 95% highest probability density (HPD) values of the tMRCA are denoted by blue bars, and the main genetic markers between the sublineages are represented in the boxes. (a) H1 HA. The AIV and EA lineages are represented by green and purple branches, respectively. (b) H3 HA. Thirteen major genetic clusters (blue) are indicated in the H3 HA phylogenetic tree.
Fig 2Amino acid alignment of H1 HA1 proteins without the signal peptide.
Dots indicate amino acids that are identical to those in the consensus sequence. The predicted antigenic sites Sa, Sb, Ca and Cb were depicted with colored shading and listed on the top. PNGs are indicated by red boxes. The isolates analyzed in this study were labelled by red dots(●). Residues marked with blue inverted triangles (▼) are receptor-binding sites (RBS).
The substitutions of the novel isolates.
| Segment | Substitution | |
|---|---|---|
| HA | H1 | N54S, I61V,T72A, K86E, S137P, A135S, V175I, T184N, D187V, Q193H, N194H, G202E, P218S, M266L, K278S, |
| H3 | S45N, T135K, N165K, G218V, G275D | |
| NA | N1 | I17T, N42D, S46P, S70N, S95N, R130K, K217R, I255V, E287K, I289T, N307D, D316G, T332I, T332V, P340S, R382G, R430Q |
| N2 | R39Q, P46S, M51T, T71N, K80Q, K136R, V165I, K172R, R224T, E258K, Q273K, I312T, H336Y, N385K, D399E, K415N, T434P, | |
| PB2 | R8K, K126R, A221V, E249D, R251K, I299V, K389R, K412R, E681D, D701N, S714G, | |
| PB1 | P64S, N158S, N175D, G216D, I336V, E371D, P454S, Y483N, | |
| PA | A70V, K256Q, D272E, R356K, N364S, H437I, T639A | |
| NP | A27S, P95S, C164Y, V186I, M316I, K351R, T396N | |
| M | S30N, R105G, T154N in pdm/09-like M1 proteins and I28T, V27A, P35A in pdm/09-like M2 proteins; N36S in EA- like M1 proteins and N13S, L55F in EA-like M2 proteins | |
| NS | L15I, T18V, N48S, V60I, Q109H, H169I, P216S in NS1 proteins and M31I and V32I, T48S, E67K, K88R in NEP | |
a, the substitutions were found in at least one isolate
Fig 3Amino acid alignment of FS4 HA1 without the signal peptide.
The predicted antigenic sites A, B, C, D and E defined previously are depicted with colored shading and listed on the top. The other markers are indicated as in Fig 2.
Fig 4Phylogenetic analysis of NA genes.
(a) N1 NA. The branches, labels, genetic markers and 95% HPD of the tMRCA are represented as in Fig 1. The red branches indicate the pdm/09 lineages. (b) N2 NA. The labels, genetic markers and 95% HPD values of the tMRCA are represented as in Fig 1.
Fig 5Genetic relationships of the PB2 (a), PB1 (b), PA (c), NP (d), M(e) and NS(f) genes. The genetic markers, labels and 95% HPD of the tMRCA are represented as in Fig 1. The representative strains of the EA lineage are depicted in orange. The red, green, purple, blue, gray and orange branches represent the pdm/09, AIV, EA, CS, HS and TR lineages, respectively.
Identification of genotypes for novel isolates.
| Genotype | Isolates | HA | NA | PB2 | PB1 | PA | NP | M | NS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | YJ4、YJ10、YJ23、BRT15、FNPA、FSC17 | EA | EA | P | P | P | P | EA | TR |
| 2 | DL2、CH8 | EA | EA | P | P | P | P | P | TR |
| 3 | EP、YJ28 | EA | Sw-N2 | P | P | P | P | EA | TR |
| 4 | CH7、DG1、DG2 | EA | Sw-N2 | P | P | P | P | P | TR |
| 5 | FS4 | Sw-H3 | Sw-N2 | P | P | P | P | P | TR |
a,Genotypes of the viruses are showed in the right with eight blocks representing each gene segment (from left to right, HA, NA, PB2, PB1, PA, NP, M, and NS). The strains are showed on the left.
Fig 6Changes of body survival (A), weights (B), and virus titration (C) of mice. 13 mice per group were anaesthetized and inoculated intranasally with 106.0 EID50 viruses in 5 genotypes. The weight loss and survival of ten mice were recorded daily for a total of 14 days. Three mice were euthanized on day 3 post-inoculation, and the the lungs, kidneys, brains, and turbinates were collected, and the virus titrationd were tested in chicken embryos. Titers of viruses that are significantly different are marked as *, P<0.01; **, P<0.001; ***, P<0.0001. Statistical analysis was performed by one-way ANOVA.