Ching-Ching Yang1, Wei-Yip Law2, Kun-Mu Lu2, Tung-Hsin Wu3. 1. 1Department of Medical Imaging and Radiological Sciences, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan. 2. 2Department of Radiology, Shin Kong Wu Ho-Su Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan. 3. 3Department of Biomedical Imaging and Radiological Sciences, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between heart rate (HR) and optimal reconstruction phase in prospectively electrocardiogram (ECG)-triggered coronary CT angiography (CCTA) performed on a newly introduced 256-slice multidetector CT (MDCT). METHODS: All the cases were selected retrospectively from the patients scheduled for CCTA in our department between January and April 2017. The scanner selected the optimal exposure phase based on 10 s ECG recordings. To ensure the success of CCTA, the operator also checked patient's age, breathing control, emotional status and past medical history to decide whether the automatically selected scan phase needs manual adjustment or not. Images were reconstructed in 1% steps of the R-R interval to determine the cardiac phase with least coronary motion. If CCTA images showed moderate motion blurring or discontinuity in the course of coronary segments, a cardiac motion correction algorithm was applied to the reconstructed images. Subjective diagnostic image quality was evaluated with 4-point grading scale. RESULTS: A total of 87 consecutive CCTA examinations were investigated in this study. Diastolic reconstruction was applied to all vessel segments in patients with HR <63 bpm, where 36.5 and 77.8% of vessel segments were reconstructed with the use of motion correction in HR ≤57 and 58-62 bpm, respectively. As for patients with HR ≥63 bpm, 89.3 and 71.7% of vessel segments were reconstructed in diastole in HR 63-67 and ≥68 bpm, respectively, while 81 and 100% of vessel segments were reconstructed with the use of motion correction in the same HR groups. CONCLUSION: Based on our results, a HR less than 67 bpm can be used to identify appropriate patients for diastolic reconstruction. Although the motion correction algorithm is an effective approach to reduce the impact of cardiac motion in CCTA, HR control is still important to optimize the image quality of CCTA. The relationship between HR and optimal reconstruction phase established in this study could be further used to tailor the ECG pulsing window for dose reduction in patients undergoing CCTA performed on the 256-slice MDCT. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: The HR thresholds to identify patients who are the best suitable candidates for diastolic or systolic reconstruction are scanner specific. This study investigated the relationship between HR and optimal reconstruction phase in prospectively ECG-triggered CCTA for a newly introduced 256-slice MDCT. Once the relationship is established, it could be used to tailor the ECG pulsing window for radiation dose reduction.
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between heart rate (HR) and optimal reconstruction phase in prospectively electrocardiogram (ECG)-triggered coronary CT angiography (CCTA) performed on a newly introduced 256-slice multidetector CT (MDCT). METHODS: All the cases were selected retrospectively from the patients scheduled for CCTA in our department between January and April 2017. The scanner selected the optimal exposure phase based on 10 s ECG recordings. To ensure the success of CCTA, the operator also checked patient's age, breathing control, emotional status and past medical history to decide whether the automatically selected scan phase needs manual adjustment or not. Images were reconstructed in 1% steps of the R-R interval to determine the cardiac phase with least coronary motion. If CCTA images showed moderate motion blurring or discontinuity in the course of coronary segments, a cardiac motion correction algorithm was applied to the reconstructed images. Subjective diagnostic image quality was evaluated with 4-point grading scale. RESULTS: A total of 87 consecutive CCTA examinations were investigated in this study. Diastolic reconstruction was applied to all vessel segments in patients with HR <63 bpm, where 36.5 and 77.8% of vessel segments were reconstructed with the use of motion correction in HR ≤57 and 58-62 bpm, respectively. As for patients with HR ≥63 bpm, 89.3 and 71.7% of vessel segments were reconstructed in diastole in HR 63-67 and ≥68 bpm, respectively, while 81 and 100% of vessel segments were reconstructed with the use of motion correction in the same HR groups. CONCLUSION: Based on our results, a HR less than 67 bpm can be used to identify appropriate patients for diastolic reconstruction. Although the motion correction algorithm is an effective approach to reduce the impact of cardiac motion in CCTA, HR control is still important to optimize the image quality of CCTA. The relationship between HR and optimal reconstruction phase established in this study could be further used to tailor the ECG pulsing window for dose reduction in patients undergoing CCTA performed on the 256-slice MDCT. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: The HR thresholds to identify patients who are the best suitable candidates for diastolic or systolic reconstruction are scanner specific. This study investigated the relationship between HR and optimal reconstruction phase in prospectively ECG-triggered CCTA for a newly introduced 256-slice MDCT. Once the relationship is established, it could be used to tailor the ECG pulsing window for radiation dose reduction.
Authors: W G Austen; J E Edwards; R L Frye; G G Gensini; V L Gott; L S Griffith; D C McGoon; M L Murphy; B B Roe Journal: Circulation Date: 1975-04 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Jie Zhang; Joel G Fletcher; W Scott Harmsen; Philip A Araoz; Eric E Williamson; Andrew N Primak; Cynthia H McCollough Journal: Acad Radiol Date: 2008-01 Impact factor: 3.173
Authors: Stephan Achenbach; Mohamed Marwan; Dieter Ropers; Tiziano Schepis; Tobias Pflederer; Katharina Anders; Axel Kuettner; Werner G Daniel; Michael Uder; Michael M Lell Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2009-11-05 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Philip A Araoz; Jacobo Kirsch; Andrew N Primak; Natalie N Braun; Osama Saba; Eric E Williamson; W Scott Harmsen; Jayawant N Mandrekar; Cynthia H McCollough Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2009-08-09 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: Harald Seifarth; Susanne Wienbeck; Michael Püsken; Kai-Uwe Juergens; David Maintz; Christian Vahlhaus; Walter Heindel; Roman Fischbach Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2007-12 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Lars Husmann; Ines Valenta; Oliver Gaemperli; Olivier Adda; Valerie Treyer; Christophe A Wyss; Patrick Veit-Haibach; Fuminari Tatsugami; Gustav K von Schulthess; Philipp A Kaufmann Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2007-12-18 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Lars Husmann; Sebastian Leschka; Lotus Desbiolles; Tiziano Schepis; Oliver Gaemperli; Burkhardt Seifert; Philippe Cattin; Thomas Frauenfelder; Thomas G Flohr; Borut Marincek; Philipp A Kaufmann; Hatem Alkadhi Journal: Radiology Date: 2007-09-11 Impact factor: 11.105