Fabio Raman1,2,3,4, Sameera Grandhi1,2, Charles F Murchison2,5, Richard E Kennedy2,5, Susan Landau6, Erik D Roberson2,3,4, Jonathan McConathy1,2. 1. Department of Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA. 2. Alzheimer's Disease Center, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA. 3. Department of Neurology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA. 4. Center for Neurodegeneration and Experimental Therapeutics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA. 5. Department of Biostatistics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA. 6. Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Tools for efficient evaluation of amyloid- and tau-PET images are needed in both clinical and research settings. OBJECTIVE: This study was designed to validate a semi-automated image analysis methodology, called Biomarker Localization, Analysis, Visualization, Extraction, and Registration (BLAzER). We tested BLAzER using two different segmentation platforms, FreeSurfer (FS) and Neuroreader (NR), for regional brain PET quantification in participants in the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) dataset. METHODS: 127 amyloid-PET and 55 tau-PET studies with volumetric MRIs were obtained from ADNI. The BLAzER methodology utilizes segmentation of MR images by FS or NR, then visualizes and quantifies regional brain PET data using FDA-cleared software (MIM), enabling quality control to ensure optimal registration and to detect segmentation errors. RESULTS: BLAzER analysis required ∼5 min plus segmentation time. BLAzER using FS segmentation showed strong agreement with ADNI for global amyloid-PET standardized uptake value ratios (SUVRs) (r = 0.9922, p < 0.001) and regional tau-PET SUVRs across all Braak staging regions (r > 0.97, p < 0.001) with high inter-operator reproducibility (ICC > 0.97) and nearly identical dichotomization as amyloid-positive or -negative (2 discrepant cases out of 127). Comparing FS versus NR segmentation with BLAzER, global SUVRs were strongly correlated for amyloid-PET (r = 0.9841, p < 0.001), but were systematically higher (4% on average) with NR, likely due to more inclusion of white matter with NR-defined regions. CONCLUSIONS: BLAzER provides an efficient methodology for regional brain PET quantification. FDA-cleared components and visualization of registration reduce barriers between research and clinical applications.
BACKGROUND: Tools for efficient evaluation of amyloid- and tau-PET images are needed in both clinical and research settings. OBJECTIVE: This study was designed to validate a semi-automated image analysis methodology, called Biomarker Localization, Analysis, Visualization, Extraction, and Registration (BLAzER). We tested BLAzER using two different segmentation platforms, FreeSurfer (FS) and Neuroreader (NR), for regional brain PET quantification in participants in the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) dataset. METHODS: 127 amyloid-PET and 55 tau-PET studies with volumetric MRIs were obtained from ADNI. The BLAzER methodology utilizes segmentation of MR images by FS or NR, then visualizes and quantifies regional brain PET data using FDA-cleared software (MIM), enabling quality control to ensure optimal registration and to detect segmentation errors. RESULTS: BLAzER analysis required ∼5 min plus segmentation time. BLAzER using FS segmentation showed strong agreement with ADNI for global amyloid-PET standardized uptake value ratios (SUVRs) (r = 0.9922, p < 0.001) and regional tau-PET SUVRs across all Braak staging regions (r > 0.97, p < 0.001) with high inter-operator reproducibility (ICC > 0.97) and nearly identical dichotomization as amyloid-positive or -negative (2 discrepant cases out of 127). Comparing FS versus NR segmentation with BLAzER, global SUVRs were strongly correlated for amyloid-PET (r = 0.9841, p < 0.001), but were systematically higher (4% on average) with NR, likely due to more inclusion of white matter with NR-defined regions. CONCLUSIONS: BLAzER provides an efficient methodology for regional brain PET quantification. FDA-cleared components and visualization of registration reduce barriers between research and clinical applications.
Authors: N Tzourio-Mazoyer; B Landeau; D Papathanassiou; F Crivello; O Etard; N Delcroix; B Mazoyer; M Joliot Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2002-01 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Bruce Fischl; David H Salat; Evelina Busa; Marilyn Albert; Megan Dieterich; Christian Haselgrove; Andre van der Kouwe; Ron Killiany; David Kennedy; Shuna Klaveness; Albert Montillo; Nikos Makris; Bruce Rosen; Anders M Dale Journal: Neuron Date: 2002-01-31 Impact factor: 17.173
Authors: Bruce Fischl; David H Salat; André J W van der Kouwe; Nikos Makris; Florent Ségonne; Brian T Quinn; Anders M Dale Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2004 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Sargo Aalto; Noora M Scheinin; Nina M Kemppainen; Kjell Någren; Marita Kailajärvi; Mika Leinonen; Mika Scheinin; Juha O Rinne Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2009-06-04 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Manja Lehmann; Abdel Douiri; Lois G Kim; Marc Modat; Dennis Chan; Sebastien Ourselin; Josephine Barnes; Nick C Fox Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2009-10-27 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: L Mosconi; W-H Tsui; S De Santi; J Li; H Rusinek; A Convit; Y Li; Madhu Boppana; M J de Leon Journal: Neurology Date: 2005-06-14 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Christopher M Clark; Julie A Schneider; Barry J Bedell; Thomas G Beach; Warren B Bilker; Mark A Mintun; Michael J Pontecorvo; Franz Hefti; Alan P Carpenter; Matthew L Flitter; Michael J Krautkramer; Hank F Kung; R Edward Coleman; P Murali Doraiswamy; Adam S Fleisher; Marwan N Sabbagh; Carl H Sadowsky; Eric P Reiman; P Eric M Reiman; Simone P Zehntner; Daniel M Skovronsky Journal: JAMA Date: 2011-01-19 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Heiko Braak; Irina Alafuzoff; Thomas Arzberger; Hans Kretzschmar; Kelly Del Tredici Journal: Acta Neuropathol Date: 2006-08-12 Impact factor: 17.088
Authors: Fabio Raman; Yu-Hua Dean Fang; Sameera Grandhi; Charles F Murchison; Richard E Kennedy; John C Morris; Parinaz Massoumzadeh; Tammie Benzinger; Erik D Roberson; Jonathan McConathy Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2021-05-28 Impact factor: 10.057