Literature DB >> 31321689

Potential benefits of gene editing for the future of poultry farming.

Mark L Tizard1, Kristie A Jenkins2, Caitlin A Cooper2, Mark E Woodcock2, Arjun Challagulla2, Timothy J Doran2.   

Abstract

The chicken is an exemplar of efficient intensive animal agriculture and provides two valuable food products, chicken meat and eggs. Only aquaculture is better, by efficiency, but poultry is still top, by mass of animal protein produced as food in the global context. However this efficiency and intensive production comes with a number of challenges. Though the genetics of selective breeding have led to dramatic improvements in yield, efficiency and product quality, traits that relate to disease and welfare outcomes have not been so tractable. These two issues are major impacts to the industry in terms of production and in terms of public perception. Both transgenic technology and genome editing have clear potential for impact in these two important areas. The reproductive biology of birds requires techniques very specific to birds to achieve heritable (germline) edited traits. These are quite involved and, even though they are now well-defined and reliable, there is room for improvement and advances can be expected in the future. Currently the key targets for this technology are modifying chicken genes involved in virus-receptor interactions and cellular response involved in infection. For the egg industry the technology is being applied to the issue of sex-selection for layer hens (and the removal of males), removal of allergens from egg white and the tailoring of eggs system to enhance the yield of influenza vaccine doses. Regulation and trading of the animals generated, and resulting food products, will significantly impact the value and future development of genome editing for poultry.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CRISPR; Gene editing; Poultry; Regulation

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31321689     DOI: 10.1007/s11248-019-00139-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transgenic Res        ISSN: 0962-8819            Impact factor:   2.788


  20 in total

1.  Targeted genome engineering in human cells with the Cas9 RNA-guided endonuclease.

Authors:  Seung Woo Cho; Sojung Kim; Jong Min Kim; Jin-Soo Kim
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2013-01-29       Impact factor: 54.908

Review 2.  Strategies to enable the adoption of animal biotechnology to sustainably improve global food safety and security.

Authors:  Mark Tizard; Eric Hallerman; Scott Fahrenkrug; Martina Newell-McGloughlin; John Gibson; Frans de Loos; Stefan Wagner; Götz Laible; Jae Yong Han; Michael D'Occhio; Lisa Kelly; John Lowenthal; Kari Gobius; Primal Silva; Caitlin Cooper; Tim Doran
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2016-05-31       Impact factor: 2.788

3.  Targeted gene knockout in chickens mediated by TALENs.

Authors:  Tae Sub Park; Hong Jo Lee; Ki Hyun Kim; Jin-Soo Kim; Jae Yong Han
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-08-19       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Germline transmission of genetically modified primordial germ cells.

Authors:  Marie-Cecile van de Lavoir; Jennifer H Diamond; Philip A Leighton; Christine Mather-Love; Babette S Heyer; Renee Bradshaw; Allyn Kerchner; Lisa T Hooi; Terri M Gessaro; Susan E Swanberg; Mary E Delany; Robert J Etches
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2006-06-08       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Chick production by in vitro fertilization of the fowl ovum.

Authors:  K Tanaka; T Wada; O Koga; Y Nishio; F Hertelendy
Journal:  J Reprod Fertil       Date:  1994-03

Review 6.  Advances in genetic engineering of the avian genome: "Realising the promise".

Authors:  Timothy J Doran; Caitlin A Cooper; Kristie A Jenkins; Mark L V Tizard
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 2.788

7.  Efficient TALEN-mediated gene targeting of chicken primordial germ cells.

Authors:  Lorna Taylor; Daniel F Carlson; Sunil Nandi; Adrian Sherman; Scott C Fahrenkrug; Michael J McGrew
Journal:  Development       Date:  2017-02-07       Impact factor: 6.868

8.  Pigs Lacking the Scavenger Receptor Cysteine-Rich Domain 5 of CD163 Are Resistant to Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome Virus 1 Infection.

Authors:  Christine Burkard; Tanja Opriessnig; Alan J Mileham; Tomasz Stadejek; Tahar Ait-Ali; Simon G Lillico; C Bruce A Whitelaw; Alan L Archibald
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2018-07-31       Impact factor: 5.103

9.  In vivo genome editing using a high-efficiency TALEN system.

Authors:  Victoria M Bedell; Ying Wang; Jarryd M Campbell; Tanya L Poshusta; Colby G Starker; Randall G Krug; Wenfang Tan; Sumedha G Penheiter; Alvin C Ma; Anskar Y H Leung; Scott C Fahrenkrug; Daniel F Carlson; Daniel F Voytas; Karl J Clark; Jeffrey J Essner; Stephen C Ekker
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-09-23       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Germline Gene Editing in Chickens by Efficient CRISPR-Mediated Homologous Recombination in Primordial Germ Cells.

Authors:  Lazar Dimitrov; Darlene Pedersen; Kathryn H Ching; Henry Yi; Ellen J Collarini; Shelley Izquierdo; Marie-Cecile van de Lavoir; Philip A Leighton
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-04-21       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  3 in total

1.  Meeting report of the OECD conference on "Genome Editing: Applications in Agriculture-Implications for Health, Environment and Regulation".

Authors:  Steffi Friedrichs; Yoko Takasu; Peter Kearns; Bertrand Dagallier; Ryudai Oshima; Janet Schofield; Catherine Moreddu
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 2.788

Review 2.  CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing in a chicken model: current approaches and applications.

Authors:  Luiza Chojnacka-Puchta; Dorota Sawicka
Journal:  J Appl Genet       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Harnessing Intronic microRNA Structures to Improve Tolerance and Expression of shRNAs in Animal Cells.

Authors:  Arjun Challagulla; Mark L Tizard; Timothy J Doran; David M Cahill; Kristie A Jenkins
Journal:  Methods Protoc       Date:  2022-02-10
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.