Craig B Monsen1,2, Joshua M Liao3, Barak Gaster3, Kevin J Flynn4, Thomas H Payne2,3. 1. Center for Analytics and Informatics, Atrius Health, Newton, Massachusetts, USA. 2. Department of Biomedical Informatics and Medical Education, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA. 3. Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA. 4. Department of Pharmacy Services, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine if medication cost transparency alerts provided at time of prescribing led ambulatory prescribers to reduce their use of low-value medications. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Provider-level alerts were deployed to ambulatory practices of a single health system from February 2018 through April 2018. Practice sites included 58 primary care and 152 specialty care clinics totaling 1896 attending physicians, residents, and advanced practice nurses throughout western Washington. Prescribers in the randomly assigned intervention arm received a computerized alert whenever they ordered a medication among 4 high-cost medication classes. For each class, a lower cost, equally effective, and safe alternative was available. The primary outcome was the change in prescribing volume for each of the 4 selected medication classes during the 12-week intervention period relative to a prior 24-week baseline. RESULTS:A total of 15 456 prescriptions for high-cost medications were written during the baseline period including 7223 in the intervention arm and 8233 in the control arm. During the intervention period, a decrease in daily prescribing volume was noted for all high-cost medications including 33% for clobetasol propionate (p < .0001), 59% for doxycycline hyclate (p < .0001), 43% for fluoxetine tablets (p < .0001), and a non-significant 3% decrease for high-cost triptans (p = .65). Prescribing volume for the high-cost medications overall decreased by 32% (p < .0001). CONCLUSION: Medication cost transparency alerts in an ambulatory setting lead to more cost-conscious prescribing. Future work is needed to predict which alerts will be most effective.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine if medication cost transparency alerts provided at time of prescribing led ambulatory prescribers to reduce their use of low-value medications. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Provider-level alerts were deployed to ambulatory practices of a single health system from February 2018 through April 2018. Practice sites included 58 primary care and 152 specialty care clinics totaling 1896 attending physicians, residents, and advanced practice nurses throughout western Washington. Prescribers in the randomly assigned intervention arm received a computerized alert whenever they ordered a medication among 4 high-cost medication classes. For each class, a lower cost, equally effective, and safe alternative was available. The primary outcome was the change in prescribing volume for each of the 4 selected medication classes during the 12-week intervention period relative to a prior 24-week baseline. RESULTS: A total of 15 456 prescriptions for high-cost medications were written during the baseline period including 7223 in the intervention arm and 8233 in the control arm. During the intervention period, a decrease in daily prescribing volume was noted for all high-cost medications including 33% for clobetasol propionate (p < .0001), 59% for doxycycline hyclate (p < .0001), 43% for fluoxetine tablets (p < .0001), and a non-significant 3% decrease for high-cost triptans (p = .65). Prescribing volume for the high-cost medications overall decreased by 32% (p < .0001). CONCLUSION: Medication cost transparency alerts in an ambulatory setting lead to more cost-conscious prescribing. Future work is needed to predict which alerts will be most effective.
Authors: Alyna T Chien; Smitha Ganeshan; Mark A Schuster; Lisa Soleymani Lehmann; Laura A Hatfield; Kate E Koplan; Carter R Petty; Anna D Sinaiko; Thomas D Sequist; Meredith B Rosenthal Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2017-01-13 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Nidhi R Shah; Andrew C Seger; Diane L Seger; Julie M Fiskio; Gilad J Kuperman; Barry Blumenfeld; Elaine G Recklet; David W Bates; Tejal K Gandhi Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2005-10-12 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: William H Shrank; George J Joseph; Niteesh K Choudhry; Henry N Young; Susan L Ettner; Peter Glassman; Steven M Asch; Richard L Kravitz Journal: Am J Manag Care Date: 2006-09 Impact factor: 2.229
Authors: Walid F Gellad; Niteesh K Choudhry; Mark W Friedberg; M Alan Brookhart; Jennifer S Haas; William H Shrank Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2008-11-04 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: James Hayward; Fionagh Thomson; Heather Milne; Susan Buckingham; Aziz Sheikh; Bernard Fernando; Kathrin Cresswell; Robin Williams; Hilary Pinnock Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2013-03-07 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Noah M Ivers; Ilana J Halperin; Jan Barnsley; Jeremy M Grimshaw; Baiju R Shah; Karen Tu; Ross Upshur; Merrick Zwarenstein Journal: Trials Date: 2012-08-01 Impact factor: 2.279
Authors: Sunita M Desai; Alan Z Chen; Jiejie Wang; Wei-Yi Chung; Jay Stadelman; Chris Mahoney; Adam Szerencsy; Lisa Anzisi; Ateev Mehrotra; Leora I Horwitz Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2022-09-12 Impact factor: 44.409
Authors: Samuel Waller Terman; Chun C Lin; Wesley T Kerr; Lindsey B DeLott; Brian C Callaghan; James F Burke Journal: Neurology Date: 2022-06-15 Impact factor: 11.800
Authors: Olivia K Richards; Bradley E Iott; Tammy R Toscos; Jessica A Pater; Shauna R Wagner; Tiffany C Veinot Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2022-05-11 Impact factor: 7.942
Authors: Arnold G Vulto; Isabelle Huys; Yannick Vandenplas; Steven Simoens; Florian Turk Journal: Appl Health Econ Health Policy Date: 2022-08-16 Impact factor: 3.686
Authors: Karalyn A Kiessling; Bradley E Iott; Jessica A Pater; Tammy R Toscos; Shauna R Wagner; Laura M Gottlieb; Tiffany C Veinot Journal: JAMIA Open Date: 2022-02-24