Literature DB >> 31321124

Double-Bundle Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Technique with Use of Endoscopic Femoral Graft Placement.

Robert F LaPrade1, Casey M Pierce1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: As the varied results seen after posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstructions might be due to surgical techniques that fail to reconstruct both functional bundles of the PCL and that injure the vastus medialis obliquus muscle, we developed a technique to address these problems and thus improve patient outcomes. STEP 1 EXAMINE UNDER ANESTHESIA: Assess range of motion and patellofemoral stability; perform stress tests, Lachman and pseudo-Lachman tests, pivot shift test, drawer tests, reverse pivot shift test, and dial test. STEP 2 PERFORM ARTHROSCOPY: Preserve any remnants of PCL at anterolateral and posteromedial bundle attachment sites to promote vascular healing. STEP 3 DRILL TIBIAL GUIDEPIN: Guidepin enters tibia at, roughly, 45° angle and 6 cm distal to joint line, midway between anterior tibial crest and posteromedial tibial border. STEP 4 PREPARE GRAFTS: Use Achilles tendon allograft for anterolateral bundle and semitendinosus or tibialis anterior allograft for posteromedial bundle. STEP 5 DRILL TUNNELS: Guidepin position should be slightly lateral to midline between apices of medial and lateral tibial eminences on anteroposterior radiograph and approximately 7 mm proximal to "champagne-glass drop-off" on lateral radiograph. STEP 6 PLACE AND SECURE GRAFTS IN FEMUR AND TIBIA: Tug hard on grafts through anterolateral arthroscopic portal to verify that they are secured within the femoral tunnel. STEP 7 POSTOPERATIVE CARE: Manage knee motion for first six weeks by prone knee flexion to counteract deleterious effects of gravity on reconstruction.
RESULTS: In a cohort of thirty-nine total patients, thirty-three males and six females, with an average age of thirty-three years, seven isolated PCL reconstructions and thirty-two combined knee reconstructions were performed. WHAT TO WATCH FOR: IndicationsContraindicationsPitfalls & Challenges.

Entities:  

Year:  2012        PMID: 31321124      PMCID: PMC6554087          DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.K.00025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JBJS Essent Surg Tech        ISSN: 2160-2204


  26 in total

1.  Biomechanical analysis of a double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  C D Harner; M A Janaushek; A Kanamori; M Yagi; T M Vogrin; S L Woo
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2000 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.202

2.  Cyclic loading of posterior cruciate ligament replacements fixed with tibial tunnel and tibial inlay methods.

Authors:  Keith L Markolf; Jason R Zemanovic; David R McAllister
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  Joint kinematics and in situ forces after single bundle PCL reconstruction: a graft placed at the center of the femoral attachment does not restore normal posterior laxity.

Authors:  Simon Lenschow; Thore Zantop; Andre Weimann; Thomas Lemburg; Michael Raschke; Michael Strobel; Wolf Petersen
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2005-11-05       Impact factor: 3.067

4.  A biomechanical comparison of posterior cruciate ligament reconstructions using single- and double-bundle tibial inlay techniques.

Authors:  John A Bergfeld; Scott M Graham; Richard D Parker; Antonio D C Valdevit; Helen E Kambic
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2005-05-11       Impact factor: 6.202

5.  Proximity of the popliteal artery to the PCL during simulated knee arthroscopy: implications for establishing the posterior trans-septal portal.

Authors:  Andrew J Cosgarea; Dennis E Kramer; Michael S Bahk; William G Totty; Matthew J Matava
Journal:  J Knee Surg       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 2.757

6.  Changes in knee laxity and ligament force after sectioning the posteromedial bundle of the posterior cruciate ligament.

Authors:  Keith L Markolf; Brian T Feeley; Samir G Tejwani; Daniel E Martin; David R McAllister
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 4.772

Review 7.  Diagnosis and treatment of posterior cruciate ligament injuries.

Authors:  David R McAllister; Frank A Petrigliano
Journal:  Curr Sports Med Rep       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 1.733

Review 8.  Arthroscopic evaluation of articular cartilage lesions in posterior-cruciate-ligament-deficient knees.

Authors:  Michael J Strobel; Andreas Weiler; Martin S Schulz; Kai Russe; H Jürgen Eichhorn
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.772

9.  Clinical outcomes after isolated arthroscopic single-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Jon K Sekiya; Robin V West; Bernard C Ong; James J Irrgang; Freddie H Fu; Christopher D Harner
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 4.772

10.  Proximal tibial opening wedge osteotomy as the initial treatment for chronic posterolateral corner deficiency in the varus knee: a prospective clinical study.

Authors:  Andrew Arthur; Robert F LaPrade; Julie Agel
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2007-08-27       Impact factor: 6.202

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.