Literature DB >> 31320004

Clinical Outcomes of Selective Versus Nonselective His Bundle Pacing.

Dominik Beer1, Parikshit S Sharma2, Faiz A Subzposh1, Angela Naperkowski1, Grzegorz M Pietrasik2, Brendan Durr1, Maria Qureshi1, Ragesh Panikkath1, Mohamed Abdelrahman3, Brent A Williams1, Jillian L Hanifin2, Ryan Zimberg2, Kelly Austin1, Brooke Macuch1, Richard G Trohman2, Erin A Vanenkevort4, Gopi Dandamudi5, Pugazhendhi Vijayaraman6.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes of nonselective (NS) His bundle pacing (HBP) compared with selective (S) HBP.
BACKGROUND: HBP is the most physiologic form of ventricular pacing. NS-HBP results in right ventricular septal pre-excitation due to fusion with myocardial capture in addition to His bundle capture resulting in widened QRS duration compared with S-HBP wherein there is exclusive His bundle capture and conduction.
METHODS: The Geisinger and Rush University HBP registries comprise 640 patients who underwent successful HBP. Our study population included 350 consecutive patients treated with HBP for bradyarrhythmic indications who demonstrated ≥20% ventricular pacing burden 3 months post-implantation. Patients were categorized into S-HBP or NS-HBP based on QRS morphology (NS-HBP n = 232; S-HBP n = 118) at the programmed output at the 3-month follow-up. The primary analysis outcome was a combined endpoint of all-cause mortality or heart failure hospitalization.
RESULTS: The NS-HBP group had a higher number of men (64% vs. 50%; p = 0.01), higher incidence of infranodal atrioventricular block (40% vs. 9%; p < 0.01), ischemic cardiomyopathy (24% vs. 14%; p = 0.03), and permanent atrial fibrillation (18% vs. 8%; p = 0.01). The primary endpoint occurred in 81 of 232 patients (35%) in the NS-HBP group compared with 23 of 118 patients (19%) in the S-HBP group (hazard ratio: 1.38; 95% confidence interval: 0.87 to 2.20; p = 0.17). Subgroup analyses of patients at greatest risk (higher pacing burden or lower left ventricular ejection fraction) revealed no incremental risk with NS-HBP.
CONCLUSIONS: NS-HBP was associated with similar outcomes of death or heart failure hospitalization when compared with S-HBP. Multicenter risk-matched clinical studies are needed to confirm these findings.
Copyright © 2019 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  His bundle pacing; heart failure hospitalization; mortality; nonselective HBP; selective HBP

Year:  2019        PMID: 31320004     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacep.2019.04.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JACC Clin Electrophysiol        ISSN: 2405-500X


  11 in total

1.  In Vitro/Ex Vivo Investigation of Modified Utah Electrode Array to Selectively Sense and Pace the Sub-Surface Cardiac His Bundle.

Authors:  Ankur R Shah; Muhammad S Khan; Annie M Hirahara; Matthias Lange; Ravi Ranjan; Derek J Dosdall
Journal:  ACS Biomater Sci Eng       Date:  2020-05-07

2.  A case report of simultaneous His pacemaker implantation and atrioventricular junction ablation following unsuccessful treatment of atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Dirk Grosse Meininghaus; Martin Lengiewicz; Kai Blembel; Juergen Kruells-Muench
Journal:  Eur Heart J Case Rep       Date:  2020-08-05

Review 3.  How His bundle pacing prevents and reverses heart failure induced by right ventricular pacing.

Authors:  Alfred Stanley; Constantine Athanasuleas; Gerald Buckberg
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2021-11       Impact factor: 4.214

Review 4.  Safety and efficacy of His-bundle pacing/left bundle branch area pacing versus right ventricular pacing: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xinyi Peng; Yu Chen; Xiaofei Wang; Aizhen Hu; Xuexun Li
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2021-05-21       Impact factor: 1.900

5.  His bundle pacing shows similar ventricular electrical activation as sinus: selective and nonselective His pacing indistinguishable.

Authors:  Annie M Hirahara; Matthias Lange; Ankur Shah; Muhammad S Khan; Ravi Ranjan; Greg Stoddard; Derek J Dosdall
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2020-10-30       Impact factor: 4.733

6.  Permanent His Bundle Pacing: A programming and troubleshooting guide.

Authors:  Jillian L Hanifin; Venkatesh Ravi; Richard G Trohman; Parikshit S Sharma
Journal:  Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J       Date:  2020-04-30

7.  Left ventricular activation time and pattern are preserved with both selective and nonselective His bundle pacing.

Authors:  Ahran D Arnold; Matthew J Shun-Shin; Nadine Ali; Daniel Keene; James P Howard; Ji-Jian Chow; Norman A Qureshi; Michael Koa-Wing; Mark Tanner; David C Lefroy; Nick W F Linton; Fu Siong Ng; Phang Boon Lim; Nicholas S Peters; Prapa Kanagaratnam; Darrel P Francis; Zachary I Whinnett
Journal:  Heart Rhythm O2       Date:  2021-08-11

8.  His bundle pacing guided by automated intrinsic morphology matching is feasible in patients with narrow QRS complexes.

Authors:  Dirk Bastian; Caterina Gregorio; Veronica Buia; Janusch Walaschek; Harald Rittger; Laura Vitali-Serdoz
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-03-04       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Discriminating electrocardiographic responses to His-bundle pacing using machine learning.

Authors:  Ahran D Arnold; James P Howard; Aiswarya A Gopi; Cheng Pou Chan; Nadine Ali; Daniel Keene; Matthew J Shun-Shin; Yousif Ahmad; Ian J Wright; Fu Siong Ng; Nick W F Linton; Prapa Kanagaratnam; Nicholas S Peters; Daniel Rueckert; Darrel P Francis; Zachary I Whinnett
Journal:  Cardiovasc Digit Health J       Date:  2020 Jul-Aug

10.  Left Ventricular Myocardial Septal Pacing in Close Proximity to LBB Does Not Prolong the Duration of the Left Ventricular Lateral Wall Depolarization Compared to LBB Pacing.

Authors:  Karol Curila; Pavel Jurak; Kevin Vernooy; Marek Jastrzebski; Petr Waldauf; Frits Prinzen; Josef Halamek; Marketa Susankova; Lucie Znojilova; Radovan Smisek; Jakub Karch; Filip Plesinger; Pawel Moskal; Luuk Heckman; Jan Mizner; Ivo Viscor; Vlastimil Vondra; Pavel Leinveber; Pavel Osmancik
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2021-12-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.