Sehhoon Park1, Joon Ho Shim2, Boram Lee2, Inju Cho3, Woong-Yang Park2, Youjin Kim1, Se-Hoon Lee1, Yoon La Choi4, Joungho Han4, Jin Seok Ahn1, Myung-Ju Ahn1, Keunchil Park1, Jong-Mu Sun5. 1. Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea. 2. Samsung Genome Institute, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Department of Health Science and Technology, Samsung Advanced Institute of Health Science and Technology, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Republic of Korea. 3. Department of Hospital Pathology, Yeouido St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University, Seoul, Republic of Korea. 4. Department of Pathology and Translational Genomics, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea. 5. Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea. Electronic address: jongmu.sun@skku.edu.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Adenocarcinoma (ADC) to squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) transformation (AST) is reported in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated non-small cell lung cancer after tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) failure. However, little is known about the underlying genomic changes during the AST process. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed our tissue database collected after first- or second- generation EGFR TKI resistance (n = 263) and identified 3 cases of AST. The additional case was acquired from the osimertinib resistance sample. Deep target sequencing (381 genes) using paired samples from 4 patients with AST after EGFR TKI treatment was performed. The histology of each sample was confirmed by TTF-1 and p63 immunohistochemistry. The patients received first- or second-generation EGFR TKI as an initial treatment. RESULTS: Overall incidence of AST was 1.1% (3/263). Transformed SCC acquired genomic alterations related to the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway, in addition to the initial EGFR mutation. In a representative case, two separate sub-clones, with a PTEN nonsense mutation and EGFR p.T790 M mutation, were observed without histologic transformation at the time of gefitinib resistance. After subsequent treatment with osimertinib, SCC transformation was observed with the disappearance of the EGFR p.T790 M mutation and acquired copy number loss in PTEN. Adopting the sub-clonal fraction model elucidates the sub-clonal evolution process of the PTEN mutant sub-clone toward AST under the background of EGFR mutation. The rest of the transformed samples also had acquired genomic alterations in PTEN, LKB1, PIK3CA, or RICTOR, which are related to the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway. CONCLUSIONS: Paired genomic analysis from our sample provides early clinical evidence of the ADC to SCC lineage transition that might be provoked by an alteration in the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway during EGFR TKI treatment. This finding could potentially broaden the known spectrum of EGFR TKI resistance mechanisms.
OBJECTIVES:Adenocarcinoma (ADC) to squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) transformation (AST) is reported in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated non-small cell lung cancer after tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) failure. However, little is known about the underlying genomic changes during the AST process. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed our tissue database collected after first- or second- generation EGFR TKI resistance (n = 263) and identified 3 cases of AST. The additional case was acquired from the osimertinib resistance sample. Deep target sequencing (381 genes) using paired samples from 4 patients with AST after EGFR TKI treatment was performed. The histology of each sample was confirmed by TTF-1 and p63 immunohistochemistry. The patients received first- or second-generation EGFR TKI as an initial treatment. RESULTS: Overall incidence of AST was 1.1% (3/263). Transformed SCC acquired genomic alterations related to the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway, in addition to the initial EGFR mutation. In a representative case, two separate sub-clones, with a PTEN nonsense mutation and EGFR p.T790 M mutation, were observed without histologic transformation at the time of gefitinib resistance. After subsequent treatment with osimertinib, SCC transformation was observed with the disappearance of the EGFR p.T790 M mutation and acquired copy number loss in PTEN. Adopting the sub-clonal fraction model elucidates the sub-clonal evolution process of the PTEN mutant sub-clone toward AST under the background of EGFR mutation. The rest of the transformed samples also had acquired genomic alterations in PTEN, LKB1, PIK3CA, or RICTOR, which are related to the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway. CONCLUSIONS: Paired genomic analysis from our sample provides early clinical evidence of the ADC to SCC lineage transition that might be provoked by an alteration in the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway during EGFR TKI treatment. This finding could potentially broaden the known spectrum of EGFR TKI resistance mechanisms.