Lisheng Xu1, Xingtao Zhang2, Guizhen Gao2, Sun Yue2. 1. Department of Life and Food Science, Suzhou University, Suzhou, 234000, China. xulisheng111@163.com. 2. Department of Life and Food Science, Suzhou University, Suzhou, 234000, China.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: S-Phenyl-L-cysteine is regarded as having potential applicability as an antiretroviral/protease inhibitor for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). In the present study, optically active S-phenyl-L-cysteine was prepared in a highly efficient manner from inexpensive bromobenzene using tryptophan synthase through a chemoenzymatic method. RESULTS: The chemoenzymatic method used a four-step reaction sequence. The process started with the reaction of magnesium and bromobenzene, followed by a Grignard reaction, and then hydrolysis and enzymatic synthesis using tryptophan synthase. Through this approach, S-phenyl-L-cysteine was chemoenzymatically synthesized using tryptophan synthase from thiophenol and L-serine as the starting material. CONCLUSIONS: High-purity, optically active S-phenyl-L-cysteine was efficiently and inexpensively obtained in a total yield of 81.3% (> 99.9% purity).
BACKGROUND:S-Phenyl-L-cysteine is regarded as having potential applicability as an antiretroviral/protease inhibitor for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). In the present study, optically active S-phenyl-L-cysteine was prepared in a highly efficient manner from inexpensive bromobenzene using tryptophansynthase through a chemoenzymatic method. <br> RESULTS: The chemoenzymatic method used a four-step reaction sequence. The process started with the reaction of magnesium and bromobenzene, followed by a Grignard reaction, and then hydrolysis and enzymaticsynthesis using tryptophansynthase. Through this approach, S-phenyl-L-cysteine was chemoenzymatically synthesized using tryptophansynthase from thiophenol and L-serine as the starting material. <br> CONCLUSIONS: High-purity, optically active S-phenyl-L-cysteine was efficiently and inexpensively obtained in a total yield of 81.3% (> 99.9% purity).
S-Phenyl-L-cysteine exhibits the dual advantages of showing long-term effects and having a chemical configuration that is comparable to the anti-AIDS drug nelfinavir. The possibility that S-phenyl-L-cysteinecan, like nelfinavir, act as an effective suppressant of HIV protease [1], has increased the importance of developing more tractable approaches for producing these chemical compounds. This is further underscored by the potential for the synthesis of phenyl-L-cysteine and its use in multiple biological activation mechanisms [2-4].The potential utility of optically active S-phenyl-L-cysteine has inspired pharmaceutical chemical scientists to explore new and effective routes to its synthesis. To date, however, only a few synthetic methods have emerged for the preparation of S-phenyl-L-cysteine. Previously, S-phenyl-L-cysteine was prepared using tryptophansynthase in Escherichia coli MT-10242 and Neurospora crassa ATCC 14692. The reaction time for preparing S-phenyl-L-cysteine using these strategies was 15 h [5, 6], and thus, they were inefficient based on their reaction time requirements. In another case, S-phenyl-L-cysteine was prepared by reacting L-cysteine hydrochloride and a soluble single-valent copper (Cu) salt with the diazonium salt of phenylamine [7, 8]. The yields of S-bromo phenyl-L-cysteine from this copper-mediated reaction, however, were not impressive (37%). A subsequent effort to synthesize S-phenyl-L-cysteine from S-bromo phenyl-L-cysteine and mercapturic acid was successful [9, 10].In the present study, S-phenyl-L-cysteine was synthesized from thiophenol and L-serine using a recombinant tryptophansynthase (E.C. 4.2.1.20) obtained from E. coli k-12 MG1655. This approach resulted in high yields of optically active S-phenyl-L-cysteine (5) (Fig. 1). The products from the reaction of thiobenzyl alcohol and ethanethiol were then isolated to demonstrate the enzymaticsynthesis of the corresponding S-substituted L-cysteines [11]. Our findings indicate that the tryptophansynthase from E. coli k-12 MG1655 effectively catalyses the synthesis of L-cysteine from L-serine and sodium hydrosulfide [12].
Fig. 1
Chemoenzymatic preparation of optically active S-phenyl-L-cysteine
Chemoenzymatic preparation of optically active S-phenyl-L-cysteine
Results
Preparation of phenylmagnesium bromide (2)
Phenylmagnesium bromide was prepared using magnesium and bromobenzene. Phenyl magnesium bromide was separated through filtration (2) (yield: 97%). 1HNMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.01~7.66 (m, 5H) Combustion elemental analysis calculated (Anal. Calcd) for C6H5MgBr: C, 39.99; H, 2.78; Br, 43.88. Found: C, 39.96; H, 2.77; Br, 43.89. ESI-MS (m/z): 181.0121 [M + H]+. The calculated mass of phenyl magnesium bromide: 180.1141.
Preparation of thiophenyl magnesium bromide (3)
Thiophenyl magnesium bromide was prepared by using sulfur and phenyl magnesium bromide. Thiophenyl magnesium bromide (3) was formed after cooling (yield: 92%). 1HNMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.29–7.32 (m, 5H). Anal. Calcd for C6H5SMgBr: C, 33.96; H, 2.35; S, 15.09; Br, 37.27. Found: C, 33.94; H, 2.34; S, 15.11; Br, 37.26. ESI-MS (m/z): 213.0311 [M + H]+. The calculated mass of phenyl magnesium bromide: 212.7812.
Preparation of thiophenol (4)
Thiophenol (4) was isolated by distillation of the upper layer of the solution. Thiophenol (4) was obtained in 95% yield. 1HNMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 6.97~7.42 (m, 5H), 3.40 (s,1H) Anal. Calcd for C6H6S: C, 65.45; H, 5.45; S, 29.10. Found: C, 65.44; H, 5.49; S, 29.07. ESI-MS (m/z): 111.1821 [M + H]+. The calculated mass of thiophenol: 111.0172.
Preparation of S-phenyl-L-cysteine (5)
The activity of tryptophansynthase is dependent on factors such as substrate concentration, temperature, and pH. Tryptophansynthase was directly mixed with substrate (180 mmol/L) at pH values from 6 to 11 at 40 °C, and the reactions were allowed to proceed for 14 h. We found the optimal initial pH for the synthesis of S-phenyl-L-cysteine was 9.0 (Fig. 2). The effect of temperatures from 10 °C to 60 °C on S-phenyl-L-cysteinesynthesis was investigated. The best yield of S-phenyl-L-cysteine was achieved at 40 °C (Fig. 3). The effect of substrate concentrations from 50 mmol/L to 400 mmol/L on S-phenyl-L-cysteinesynthesis was investigated. The optimal substrate concentration was 180 mmol/L (Fig. 4). Tryptophansynthase was directly mixed with thiophenol and L-serine under the optimum reaction conditions of pH 9.0, 40 °C, using Trion X-100 at 0.02% (Fig. 5). After drying the crystals, 16.04 g of S-phenyl-L-cysteine was obtained (yield: 96%). The purity of S-phenyl-L-cysteine was 99.9% as verified by HPLC (Fig. 6). Specific rotation [α] = + 73~ + 75 ° (c = 1, 1.5 M H2SO4). 1HNMR (400 MHz, D2O): δ 2.81 (dd, J = 7.82, 3.13 Hz, H), 2.88 (d, J = 3.13 Hz, H), 3.13(d, J = 7.82 Hz, H), 7.21~7.39 (m, PhH, 5H) (Fig. 7). Anal. Calcd for C9H11NO2S: C, 54.75; H, 5.57; N, 7.09. Found: C, 54.72; H, 5.52; N, 7.05. ESI-MS (m/z): 198.254 [M + H]+ (Fig. 8). The calculated mass of S-phenyl-L-cysteine: 197.2312.
Fig. 2
Effect of pH on the tryptophan synthase-catalysed synthesis of S-phenyl-L-cysteine. Tryptophan synthase was directly mixed with the substrate (180 mmol/L) at 40 °C for 14 h using Trion X-100 at 0.02%
Fig. 3
Effect of temperature on the tryptophan synthase-catalysed synthesis of S-phenyl-L-cysteine. Tryptophan synthase was directly mixed with the substrate (180 mmol/L) at pH 9.0 for 14 h using Trion X-100 at 0.02%
Fig. 4
Effect of substrate concentration on the tryptophan synthase-catalysed synthesis of S-phenyl-L-cysteine. Tryptophan synthase was directly mixed with the substrate at 40 °C and pH 9.0 for 14 h using Trion X-100 at 0.02%
Fig. 5
Changes in the concentrations of S-phenyl-L-cysteine and thiophenol. The concentrations of S-phenyl-L-cysteine (o) and phenylthiol alcohol (■) were measured at different times
Fig. 6
HPLC chromatograms of S-phenyl-L-cysteine. (Reaction times a: 0 h, b: 6 h, and c: 8 h)
Fig. 7
1H NMR spectrum of S-phenyl-L-cysteine (400 MHz, D2O)
Fig. 8
Mass spectrum of S-phenyl-L-cysteine
Effect of pH on the tryptophansynthase-catalysed synthesis of S-phenyl-L-cysteine. Tryptophansynthase was directly mixed with the substrate (180 mmol/L) at 40 °C for 14 h using Trion X-100 at 0.02%Effect of temperature on the tryptophansynthase-catalysed synthesis of S-phenyl-L-cysteine. Tryptophansynthase was directly mixed with the substrate (180 mmol/L) at pH 9.0 for 14 h using Trion X-100 at 0.02%Effect of substrate concentration on the tryptophansynthase-catalysed synthesis of S-phenyl-L-cysteine. Tryptophansynthase was directly mixed with the substrate at 40 °C and pH 9.0 for 14 h using Trion X-100 at 0.02%Changes in the concentrations of S-phenyl-L-cysteine and thiophenol. The concentrations of S-phenyl-L-cysteine (o) and phenylthiol alcohol (■) were measured at different timesHPLCchromatograms of S-phenyl-L-cysteine. (Reaction times a: 0 h, b: 6 h, and c: 8 h)1HNMR spectrum of S-phenyl-L-cysteine (400 MHz, D2O)Mass spectrum of S-phenyl-L-cysteine
Discussion
Tryptophan is a naturally occurring amino acid that is synthesized by tryptophansynthase in plants and microorganisms. While indole-3-glycerol phosphate has been synthesized by the α-subunit of tryptophansynthase, it has not been used for the synthesis of tryptophan analogues. A series of analogues of L-tryptophan were synthesized through a β-reaction using tryptophansynthase [13]. Likewise, we reported the synthesis of S-phenyl-L-cysteine using tryptophansynthase from L-serine derived from the hydrolysis of keratin from industrial wastewater and thiophenol [14]. High-purity tryptophan was produced in excellent yield.Thiophenols are synthesized from phenols through a reaction with thiophosgene to form an aryl chlorothionoformate [15] that is then reacted with hydrogen sulfide over an absorptive catalyst, such as activated carbon or calcined petroleum coke [16]. The production of a thiophenol involves the reaction of hydrogen sulfide and a source of hydrogen with a halogenated aromaticcompound [17]. All of the above methods require heating at a high temperature and have high production costs.In this study, thiophenol was formed by a simple, 4-step sequence involving the reaction of magnesium and bromobenzene (1) to form phenylmagnesium bromide (2), a Grignard reaction with sulfur to form thiophenyl magnesium bromide (3), and hydrolysis using sulfuric acid to form the resulting thiophenol (4).
Conclusions
Optically active S-phenyl-L-cysteine (5) was synthesized using tryptophansynthase from low-cost bromobenzene (1). Tryptophansynthase was successfully applied for the preparation of optically active S-phenyl-L-cysteine in excellent purity (> 99.9%) and high yield (81.3%).
Methods
Reagents and instruments
All chemical reagents were of analytical grade and were purchased from Aladdin Reagent Corporation (Shanghai, China). The chemical compositions of S-phenyl-L-cysteine and thiophenol were verified using HPLC (Shimadzu High-Performance Liquid Chromatograph, Kyoto, Japan). 1HNMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker DRX500 (500 MHz; Tokyo, Japan). Optical rotations were recorded using a WZZ-2B polarimeter (Hinotek, Ningbo, China). Mass spectra were recorded on a Mariner ESI-TOF mass spectrometer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). The enantiomeric purities of the residual substrate were determined as described by Zheng [18]. Elemental compositions were measured using a trace element auto analyser (EA3000 type).
Enzymes
The gene encoding tryptophansynthase was cloned from E. coli k-12 MG1655. The E. coli strainBL21(DE3) carrying the recombinant plasmid Duet-trpBA (DM206) was constructed in our laboratory (Fig. 9). Tryptophansynthase appeared as an intense protein band with an apparent molecular mass of approximately 45 kDa. The amplified PCR product was separated by agarose gel electrophoresis. The gene encoding tryptophansynthase was 2 kb. A loopful of strain culture was used to inoculate 40 ml of LB broth in a 200 ml Erlenmeyer flask. The flask was incubated at 30 °C for 12 h on a rotary shaker at 170 rpm. Tryptophansynthase was purified according to the protocol described by Tsunehiko et al. [19]. The cells containing tryptophansynthase were placed in 40 ml of 40 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5) and then ultrasonicated at 4 °C. The cell-free extracts of tryptophansynthase were then fractionated using (NH4)2SO4 (20–60%). The active fractions of tryptophansynthase were collected by (NH4)2SO4 sedimentation; they were then applied to a DEAE-Sepharose CL-6B column (4.5× 85 cm; Seikagaku Kogyo, Japan) and equilibrated with 45 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5) containing 1 mM manganese sulfate. The tryptophansynthase was eluted using 45 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5) containing 1 mM manganese sulfate. The final tryptophansynthase sample was found to be homogeneous based on SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Following the addition of (NH4)2SO4 to the final tryptophansynthase sample, it was stored at 4 °C in buffer containing 45 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5) with 1 mM manganese sulfate, which is the buffer system that had been used throughout the tryptophansynthase purification procedure. The activity of tryptophansynthase was determined by the conversion rate of S-phenyl-L-cysteine. Tryptophansynthase was directly mixed with the substrate (100 mmol/L) at 40 °C and pH 9.0 for 14 h using Trion X-100 at 0.02%.
Fig. 9
a. Agarose gel electrophoresis analysis of tryptophan synthase gene. Lane M: nucleic acid molecular mass standards. Lane 1: the product of tryptophan synthase PCR. b. SDS-PAGE analysis of recombinant E. coli expressing recombinant tryptophan synthase
a. Agarose gel electrophoresis analysis of tryptophansynthase gene. Lane M: nucleic acid molecular mass standards. Lane 1: the product of tryptophansynthase PCR. b. SDS-PAGE analysis of recombinant E. coli expressing recombinant tryptophansynthaseThe preparation of thiophenol included three steps: (1) the reaction of magnesium and bromobenzene, which formed phenyl magnesium bromide; (2) a Grignard reaction with sulfur, which formed thiophenyl magnesium bromide; and (3) the hydrolysation of thiophenyl magnesium bromide by sulfuric acid, which afforded thiophenol (4).For the first step, bromobenzene was dissolved in THF. Bromobenzene (25%) was added to the reactor containing magnesium. Bromobenzene (15.6 g) was dissolved in tetrahydrofuran (THF, 50 mL). A quarter of the bromobenzene solution and the magnesium (3.07 g) were added to the reactor. The reactor was stirred at 170 rpm under N2. Bromoethane (1.66 g) in THF (5 mL) was added into the reactor. The mixture was heated at 75 °C. The remaining bromobenzene in THF was dropped into the reactor after cooling. The reactor was stirred at 75 °C for 150 min. After cooling the filtrate to 30 °C, the formed phenyl magnesium bromide (2) was separated by filtration.For the second step, sulfur (4.05 g) was dropped into the reactor with phenyl magnesium bromide (2). The reactor was stirred at 50 °C. Thereafter, the mixture was heated at reflux for 1 h. Thiophenyl magnesium bromide (3) was formed upon cooling.In the third step, thiophenyl magnesium bromide was hydrolysed by sulfuric acid. Sulfuric acid (44 ml; 2.27 M) was dropped into the reactor over 20 min at 60 °C. The reactor was stirred at 75 °C for an additional 60 min. Another portion of sulfuric acid (14.4 ml; 6.93 M) was dropped into the reactor over 20 min. The resulting solution formed two layers.
The enzymatic step
In this study, thiophenol (4) was prepared through three simple steps (Fig. 1). S-Phenyl-L-cysteine (5) was synthesized using tryptophansynthase. In the biosynthetic reaction, the reactor was stirred at 170 rpm under N2. The content of thiophenol gradually decreased as S-phenyl-L-cysteine was formed over 14 h. After 14 h, HCl was added to the enzymatic reaction to adjust its pH to 0.5, generating S-phenyl-L-cysteine. The enzymatic reaction mixture was filtered, and the filtrated was adjusted to pH 2.5 using sodium hydroxide. After cooling the filtrate to 10 °C, the target product (S-phenyl-L-cysteine) was obtained.
Authors: S W Kaldor; V J Kalish; J F Davies; B V Shetty; J E Fritz; K Appelt; J A Burgess; K M Campanale; N Y Chirgadze; D K Clawson; B A Dressman; S D Hatch; D A Khalil; M B Kosa; P P Lubbehusen; M A Muesing; A K Patick; S H Reich; K S Su; J H Tatlock Journal: J Med Chem Date: 1997-11-21 Impact factor: 7.446