| Literature DB >> 31319503 |
Thi-Ngoc-Mai Tran1,2, Guillaume Bernadat3, Dinh-Tri Mai1,4, Van-Kieu Nguyen5, Jirapast Sichaem6, Tan-Phat Nguyen1,4, Cong-Luan Tran1,7, Phuong-Vy Do8, Nguyen-Minh-An Tran9, Huu-Hung Nguyen10, Mehdi A Beniddir3, Thuc-Huy Duong11,12, Pierre Le Pogam13.
Abstract
Two new cycloartane glycosides, nervisides I-J, were isolated from Nervilia concolor whole plants. Their structures were unambiguously established by interpretation of their HRESIMS and 1D and 2D NMR data. These cycloartanes comprised a stereogenic center at C-24, the R configuration of which was assigned based on DFT-NMR calculations and the subsequent DP4 probability score. These compounds were tested for cytotoxicity against K562 and MCF-7 tumor cell lines, revealing mild cytotoxic activity.Entities:
Keywords: Nervilia concolor; cycloartane; saponoside; triterpene; xylopyranose
Year: 2019 PMID: 31319503 PMCID: PMC6681409 DOI: 10.3390/molecules24142599
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1Structures of compounds 1–2.
13C and 1H NMR spectroscopic data (125/500 MHz) for 1–2 in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO)-d6 (δ in ppm).
| 1 | 2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| δC | δH ( | δC | δH ( | |
| 1 | 70.8 | 3.34, 1H, br s | 70.7 | 3.34, 1H, br s |
| 2 | 36.1 | 1.84, 1H, m | 36.0 | 1.84, 1H, m |
| 3 | 78.8 | 4.40, 1H, dd, 12.0, 4.5 | 78.8 | 4.40, 1H, dd, 12.0, 4.5 |
| 4 | 53.0 | _ | 52.9 | _ |
| 5 | 36.6 | 2.41, 1H, dd, 13.0, 4.5 | 36.5 | 2.42,1H, dd, 12.5, 3.5 |
| 6 | 22.0 | 1.14, 1H, m | 21.9 | 1.16, 1H, m |
| 7 | 25.1 | 1.02, 2H, m | 25.0 | 1.02, 2H, m |
| 8 | 47.5 | 1.43, 1H, m | 47.3 | 1.46, 1H, m |
| 9 | 20.1 | - | 19.9 | - |
| 10 | 28.9 | - | 28.7 | |
| 11 | 25.0 | 2.27, 1H, m | 24.9 | 2.27, 1H, m |
| 12 | 32.6 | 1.55–1.57, 2H, m | 32.8 | 1.56–1.60, 2H, m |
| 13 | 44.8 | - | 44.7 | - |
| 14 | 48.7 | - | 48.6 | - |
| 15 | 35.3 | 1.21–1.22, 2H, m | 35.2 | 1.26–1.29, 2H, m |
| 16 | 27.8 | 1.84, 1H, m | 27.6 | 1.84, 1H, m |
| 17 | 51.9 | 1.54, 1H, m | 51.6 | 1.57, 1H, m |
| 18 | 18.0 | 0.91, 3H, s | 17.8 | 0.90, 3H, m |
| 19 | 28.8 | 0.36, 1H, d, 4.0 | 28.7 | 0.35, 1H, d, 4.0 |
| 20 | 36.4 | 1.26, 1H, m | 36.0 | 1.29, 1H, m |
| 21 | 18.3 | 0.82, 3H, s | 18.2 | 0.85, 3H, s |
| 22 | 29.0 | 1.43, 1H, m | 29.0 | 1.45, 1H, m |
| 23 | 30.8 | 1.43, 1H, m | 30.9 | 1.45, 1H, m |
| 24 | 74.6 | - | 73.4 | _ |
| 25 | 32.3 | 1.70, 1H, m | 32.4 | 1.72, 1H, m |
| 26 | 17.1 | 0.80–0.82, 3H, m | 16.8 | 0.80–0.85, 3H, m |
| 27 | 17.1 | 0.80–0.82, 3H, m | 16.7 | 0.80–0.85, 3H, m |
| 28 | 178.5 | 178.6 | ||
| 29 | 9.5 | 0.97, 3H, s | 9.5 | 0.97, 3H, s |
| 30 | 19.1 | 0.89, 3H, s | 19.0 | 0.91, 3H, s |
| 31 | 64.7 | 3.25, 2H, m | 66.9 | 3.89, 1H, d, 11.0 |
| 1’ | 104.1 | 4.14, 1H, d, 7.5 | 104.0 | 4.15, 1H, d, 7.5 |
| 2’ | 73.7 | 2.88, 1H, dd, 9.0, 7.5 | 73.5 | 2.88, 1H, t, 8.5 |
| 3’ | 76.4 | 3.05, 1H, t, 9.0 | 76.3 | 3.06, 1H, t, 8.5 |
| 4’ | 69.6 | 3.23, 1H, m | 69.5 | 3.24, 1H, m |
| 5’ | 65.7 | 3.66, 1H, dd, 11.5, 5.0 | 65.6 | 3.66, 1H, dd, 11.0, 5.0 |
| 2.97, 1H, t, 11.5 | 2.97, 1H, t, 11.0 | |||
| OAc | 20.7 | 1.99, 3H, s | ||
| 170.3 | ||||
Figure 2Key HMBC correlations of 1–2.
Figure 3Key NOE correlations of 1.