| Literature DB >> 31319124 |
Yang Liu1, Wery P M van den Wildenberg2, Ysanne de Graaf3, Susan L Ames4, Alexander Baldacchino5, Ragnhild Bø6, Fernando Cadaveira7, Salvatore Campanella8, Paul Christiansen9, Eric D Claus10, Lorenza S Colzato11, Francesca M Filbey12, John J Foxe13, Hugh Garavan14, Christian S Hendershot15, Robert Hester16, Jennifer M Jester17, Hollis C Karoly18, Anja Kräplin19, Fanny Kreusch20, Nils Inge Landrø6, Marianne Littel21, Sabine Loeber22, Edythe D London23, Eduardo López-Caneda24, Dan I Lubman25, Maartje Luijten26, Cecile A Marczinski27, Jane Metrik28, Catharine Montgomery29, Harilaos Papachristou30, Su Mi Park31, Andres L Paz32, Géraldine Petit9, James J Prisciandaro33, Boris B Quednow34, Lara A Ray35, Carl A Roberts9, Gloria M P Roberts36, Michiel B de Ruiter37, Claudia I Rupp38, Vaughn R Steele10, Delin Sun39, Michael Takagi40, Susan F Tapert41, Ruth J van Holst42, Antonio Verdejo-Garcia43, Matthias Vonmoos34, Marcin Wojnar44, Yuanwei Yao45, Murat Yücel46, Martin Zack47, Robert A Zucker17, Hilde M Huizenga48, Reinout W Wiers49.
Abstract
Many studies have reported that heavy substance use is associated with impaired response inhibition. Studies typically focused on associations with a single substance, while polysubstance use is common. Further, most studies compared heavy users with light/non-users, though substance use occurs along a continuum. The current mega-analysis accounted for these issues by aggregating individual data from 43 studies (3610 adult participants) that used the Go/No-Go (GNG) or Stop-signal task (SST) to assess inhibition among mostly "recreational" substance users (i.e., the rate of substance use disorders was low). Main and interaction effects of substance use, demographics, and task-characteristics were entered in a linear mixed model. Contrary to many studies and reviews in the field, we found that only lifetime cannabis use was associated with impaired response inhibition in the SST. An interaction effect was also observed: the relationship between tobacco use and response inhibition (in the SST) differed between cannabis users and non-users, with a negative association between tobacco use and inhibition in the cannabis non-users. In addition, participants' age, education level, and some task characteristics influenced inhibition outcomes. Overall, we found limited support for impaired inhibition among substance users when controlling for demographics and task-characteristics.Entities:
Keywords: Go/No-Go task; Mega-analysis; Polysubstance use; Response inhibition; Stop-signal task
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31319124 DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.07.006
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Neurosci Biobehav Rev ISSN: 0149-7634 Impact factor: 9.052