Literature DB >> 31318793

Improved Disease-free Survival After Prehabilitation for Colorectal Cancer Surgery.

Maude Trépanier1,2, Enrico M Minnella3, Tiffany Paradis2,4, Rashami Awasthi3, Pepa Kaneva2, Kevin Schwartzman5,6, Franco Carli3, Gerald M Fried1,2, Liane S Feldman1,2, Lawrence Lee1,2,6.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of prehabilitation on survival after colorectal cancer surgery. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Preoperative multimodal exercise and nutritional programs (prehabilitation) improve functional capacity and recovery following colorectal surgery. Exercise may also affect cancer outcomes by mediating the systemic inflammatory response. The effect of prehabilitation on cancer outcomes is unknown.
METHODS: Pooled data from 3 prehabilitation trials (2 randomized controlled trials, 1 cohort) in patients undergoing elective, biopsy-proven, primary non-metastatic colorectal cancer surgery from 2009 to 2014 within an enhanced recovery program were analyzed. Patients were grouped into +prehab or-prehab. The primary outcomes were 5-year disease-free (DFS) and overall survival (OS). DFS and OS were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier curves and multiple Cox regression.
RESULTS: A total of 202 patients were included (+prehab 104, -prehab 98). Median prehabilitation duration was 29 days (interquartile range 20-40). Patient and tumor characteristics were well-balanced (33% stage III). Postoperative complications and time to adjuvant chemotherapy were similar. Mean duration of follow-up was 60.3 months (standard deviation 26.2). DFS was similar for the combined group of stage I-III patients (P = 0.244). For stage III patients, prehabilitation was associated with improved DFS (73.4% vs 50.9%, P = 0.044). There were no differences in OS (P = 0.226). Prehabilitation independently predicted improved DFS (hazard ratio 0.45; 95% confidence interval, 0.21-0.93), adjusting for stage and other confounders. Prehabilitation did not independently predict OS.
CONCLUSION: In this report, prehabilitation is associated with improved 5-year DFS in stage III colorectal cancer. This finding should be confirmed in future trials.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31318793     DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003465

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  25 in total

Review 1.  Conflicting Guidelines: A Systematic Review on the Proper Interval for Colorectal Cancer Treatment.

Authors:  Charlotte J L Molenaar; Loes Janssen; Donald L van der Peet; Desmond C Winter; Rudi M H Roumen; Gerrit D Slooter
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2021-04-03       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Albumin-Derived NLR Score is a Novel Prognostic Marker for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  Tomoki Abe; Taro Oshikiri; Hironobu Goto; Takashi Kato; Manabu Horikawa; Ryuichiro Sawada; Hitoshi Harada; Naoki Urakawa; Hiroshi Hasegawa; Shingo Kanaji; Kimihiro Yamashita; Takeru Matsuda; Yoshihiro Kakeji
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-11-22       Impact factor: 5.344

3.  The Shouldice Method: an expert's consensus.

Authors:  Marguerite Mainprize; Fernando A C Spencer Netto; Cassim Degani; Peter Szasz
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2022-08-08       Impact factor: 2.920

4.  Risk factor for the development of surgical site infection following ileostomy reversal: a single-center report.

Authors:  Shuangming Lin; Dongbo Xu; Yibin Zhu; Jianxun Chen
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2022-08-24

Review 5.  Prehabilitation versus no prehabilitation to improve functional capacity, reduce postoperative complications and improve quality of life in colorectal cancer surgery.

Authors:  Charlotte Jl Molenaar; Stefan J van Rooijen; Hugo Jp Fokkenrood; Rudi Mh Roumen; Loes Janssen; Gerrit D Slooter
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2022-05-19

6.  Training prediction models for individual risk assessment of postoperative complications after surgery for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  V Lin; A Tsouchnika; E Allakhverdiiev; A W Rosen; M Gögenur; J S R Clausen; K B Bräuner; J S Walbech; P Rijnbeek; I Drakos; I Gögenur
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2022-05-20       Impact factor: 3.699

Review 7.  Does nutrition support during chemotherapy increase long-term survival of cancer patients? Lessons from the past and future perspectives.

Authors:  Federico Bozzetti
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2021-07-26       Impact factor: 3.603

8.  What's the magic number? Impact of time to initiation of treatment for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Gretchen C Edwards; Adriana C Gamboa; Michael P Feng; Roberta L Muldoon; Michael B Hopkins; Sherif Abdel-Misih; Glen C Balch; Jennifer Holder-Murray; Maryam Mohammed; Scott E Regenbogen; Matthew L Silviera; Alexander T Hawkins
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2021-09-24       Impact factor: 4.348

9.  Improving postoperative outcome in rectal cancer surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery in an era of increasing laparoscopic resection.

Authors:  Nathalie Bakker; Hiëronymus J Doodeman; Michalda S Dunker; Wilhelmina H Schreurs; Alexander P J Houdijk
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2021-07-26       Impact factor: 3.445

10.  Induction versus no induction chemotherapy before neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and surgery in oesophageal adenocarcinoma: a multicentre randomised phase II trial (NCCTG N0849 [Alliance]).

Authors:  Harry H Yoon; Fang-Shu Ou; Gamini S Soori; Qian Shi; Dennis A Wigle; Robert P Sticca; Robert Clell Miller; James L Leenstra; Patrick J Peller; Brenda Ginos; Erica Heying; Tsung-Teh Wu; Timothy F Drevyanko; Stephen Ko; Bassam Ibrahim Mattar; Daniel A Nikcevich; Robert J Behrens; Maged F Khalil; George P Kim; Steven R Alberts
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2021-04-29       Impact factor: 10.002

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.