Literature DB >> 35593971

Training prediction models for individual risk assessment of postoperative complications after surgery for colorectal cancer.

V Lin1, A Tsouchnika2, E Allakhverdiiev2, A W Rosen2, M Gögenur2, J S R Clausen2, K B Bräuner2, J S Walbech2, P Rijnbeek3, I Drakos2, I Gögenur2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The occurrence of postoperative complications and anastomotic leakage are major drivers of mortality in the immediate phase after colorectal cancer surgery. We trained prediction models for calculating patients' individual risk of complications based only on preoperatively available data in a multidisciplinary team setting. Knowing prior to surgery the probability of developing a complication could aid in improving informed decision-making by surgeon and patient and individualize surgical treatment trajectories.
METHODS: All patients over 18 years of age undergoing any resection for colorectal cancer between January 1, 2014 and December 31, 2019 from the nationwide Danish Colorectal Cancer Group database were included. Data from the database were converted into Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership Common Data Model maintained by the Observation Health Data Science and Informatics initiative. Multiple machine learning models were trained to predict postoperative complications of Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ 3B and anastomotic leakage within 30 days after surgery.
RESULTS: Between 2014 and 2019, 23,907 patients underwent resection for colorectal cancer in Denmark. A Clavien-Dindo complication grade ≥ 3B occurred in 2,958 patients (12.4%). Of 17,190 patients that received an anastomosis, 929 experienced anastomotic leakage (5.4%). Among the compared machine learning models, Lasso Logistic Regression performed best. The predictive model for complications had an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.704 (95%CI 0.683-0.724) and an AUROC of 0.690 (95%CI 0.655-0.724) for anastomotic leakage.
CONCLUSIONS: The prediction of postoperative complications based only on preoperative variables using a national quality assurance colorectal cancer database shows promise for calculating patient's individual risk. Future work will focus on assessing the value of adding laboratory parameters and drug exposure as candidate predictors. Furthermore, we plan to assess the external validity of our proposed model.
© 2022. Springer Nature Switzerland AG.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Colorectal cancer; Complications; Machine learning; Prediction model; Surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35593971     DOI: 10.1007/s10151-022-02624-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tech Coloproctol        ISSN: 1123-6337            Impact factor:   3.699


  30 in total

1.  Risk factors for anastomotic leak and postoperative morbidity and mortality after elective right colectomy for cancer: results from a prospective, multicentric study of 1102 patients.

Authors:  Matteo Frasson; Pablo Granero-Castro; José Luis Ramos Rodríguez; Blas Flor-Lorente; Mariela Braithwaite; Eva Martí Martínez; Jose Antonio Álvarez Pérez; Antonio Codina Cazador; Alejandro Espí; Eduardo Garcia-Granero
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience.

Authors:  Pierre A Clavien; Jeffrey Barkun; Michelle L de Oliveira; Jean Nicolas Vauthey; Daniel Dindo; Richard D Schulick; Eduardo de Santibañes; Juan Pekolj; Ksenija Slankamenac; Claudio Bassi; Rolf Graf; René Vonlanthen; Robert Padbury; John L Cameron; Masatoshi Makuuchi
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Short-term outcome of emergency colorectal cancer surgery: results from Bi-National Colorectal Cancer Audit.

Authors:  Chun Hin Angus Lee; Joseph Cherng Huei Kong; Alexander G Heriot; Satish Warrier; John Zalcberg; Paul Sitzler
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2018-09-30       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Anastomotic leak increases distant recurrence and long-term mortality after curative resection for colonic cancer: a nationwide cohort study.

Authors:  Peter-Martin Krarup; Andreas Nordholm-Carstensen; Lars N Jorgensen; Henrik Harling
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  The Relationship Between Clavien-Dindo Morbidity Classification and Oncologic Outcomes After Colorectal Cancer Resection.

Authors:  Leonardo C Duraes; Luca Stocchi; Scott R Steele; Matthew F Kalady; James M Church; Emre Gorgun; David Liska; Hermann Kessler; Olga A Lavryk; Conor P Delaney
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2017-11-07       Impact factor: 5.344

6.  Use of Machine Learning for Prediction of Patient Risk of Postoperative Complications After Liver, Pancreatic, and Colorectal Surgery.

Authors:  Katiuscha Merath; J Madison Hyer; Rittal Mehta; Ayesha Farooq; Fabio Bagante; Kota Sahara; Diamantis I Tsilimigras; Eliza Beal; Anghela Z Paredes; Lu Wu; Aslam Ejaz; Timothy M Pawlik
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2019-08-05       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  Validation of the Danish Colorectal Cancer Group (DCCG.dk) database - on behalf of the Danish Colorectal Cancer Group.

Authors:  M F Klein; I Gögenur; P Ingeholm; S H Njor; L H Iversen; K J Emmertsen
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2020-10-07       Impact factor: 3.788

8.  Importance of the first postoperative year in the prognosis of elderly colorectal cancer patients.

Authors:  J W T Dekker; C B M van den Broek; E Bastiaannet; L G M van de Geest; R A E M Tollenaar; G J Liefers
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2011-03-29       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 9.  Danish Colorectal Cancer Group Database.

Authors:  Peter Ingeholm; Ismail Gögenur; Lene H Iversen
Journal:  Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2016-10-25       Impact factor: 4.790

10.  The impact of comorbidities on post-operative complications following colorectal cancer surgery.

Authors:  David E Flynn; Derek Mao; Stephanie T Yerkovich; Robert Franz; Harish Iswariah; Andrew Hughes; Ian M Shaw; Diana P L Tam; Manju D Chandrasegaram
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-12-23       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.