| Literature DB >> 31317077 |
Ahmed A Abdurahman1, Eshetu E Chaka2, Mohammed H Bule3, Kamal Niaz4,5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIM: Concurrent estimates on the magnitude and evidence on the determinants of complementary feeding (CF) practices in Ethiopia are currently disparate. Hence, this systematic review and meta-analysis assessed the magnitude and determinants of CF among children age 6-23 months in Ethiopia.Entities:
Keywords: Children; Complementary feeding; Diet quality indice; Dietary diversity; Energy intake; Ethiopia; Food science; Human; Meal frequency; Public health
Year: 2019 PMID: 31317077 PMCID: PMC6611936 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01865
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Heliyon ISSN: 2405-8440
Fig. 1PRISMA flow diagram through the different phases of the systematic review and meta-analysis.
Summary of main characteristics of the included studies.
| S/N | First Author Last Name | Year of Publication | Year of data collection | Study Region | Place Study | Study type | Sample size | Age | TI Preval. (%) | MDD Preval. (%) | MMF Preval. (%) | MAD Preval. (%) | Quality Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Wubante AA. | 2017 | 2013 | North Gondar | Rural | CC | 400 | 0–12m | 86.3 | NR | NR | NR | 7 |
| 2 | Sisay W. | 2016 | 2015 | Northeast | Both | CS | 421 | 6–23m | 62.9 | 12.1 | 51.5 | NR | 9 |
| 3 | Shumey A | 2013 | 2011 | Northern | Urban | CS | 422 | 6–12m | 62.8 | NR | NR | NR | 8 |
| 4 | Semahegn A | 2014 | 2013 | Harar town | Both | CS | 200 | 25.4 ± 14.9 | 60.5 | NR | NR | NR | 7 |
| 5 | Regassa N. | 2014 | NR | Southern | Both | CS | 1094 | <24m | 71.5 | 42.4 | 71.9 | NR | 7 |
| 6 | Nguyen PH. | 2013 | NR | North and South | Both | CS | 875 | 6–24m | NR | 6.3 | NR | NR | 5 |
| 7 | Moges D. | 2016 | NR | Southern | Rural | CS | 180 | 6–23m | 20.6 | 3.3 | 56.1 | 3.3 | 4 |
| 8 | Kassa T. | 2016 | 2015 | Southern | Rural | CS | 611 | 6–23m | 72.5 | 18.8 | 67.3 | 12.3 | 10 |
| 9 | Gebremedhin S. | 2016 | 2014 | South Wollo | Rural | CS | 2080 | 6–23m | NR | 7.0 | NR | NR | 5 |
| 10 | Ersino G. | 2016 | 2013 | Southern | Rural | CS | 279 | 0–24m | NR | 8.2 | 58.2 | 6.5 | 8 |
| 11 | Dangura D. | 2017 | 2015 | Southern | Rural | CS | 417 | 6–23m | NR | 10.6 | 77.9 | 8.4 | 6 |
| 12 | Bilal SM. | 2016 | 2013 | Northern | Both | CS | 840 | 6–23m | NR | 82.0 | NR | NR | 7 |
| 13 | Beyene M. | 2015 | 2014 | Northwest | Urban | CS | 920 | 6–23m | NR | 12.6 | 50.4 | NR | 10 |
| 14 | Aemro M. | 2013 | 2011 | DHS (country) | Both | CS | 2836 | 6–23m | NR | 10.3 | 44.7 | NR | 4 |
| 15 | Roba KT. | 2016 | 2014 | Mixed (country) | Both | CS | 216 | 6–23m | NR | 22.2 | 50.5 | 12.0 | 6 |
| 16 | Gibson RS. | 2015 | 2006 | Southern | NR | CS | 97 | 6–23m | NR | 3.1 | NR | NR | 7 |
| 17 | Yohannes B. | 2018 | 2015 | Southwest | Rural | CS | 543 | 6–23m | 34.3 | NR | NR | NR | 10 |
| 18 | Tegegne M. | 2017 | 2016 | Southeast | Both | CS | 801 | 6–23m | NR | 28.5 | 68.4 | NR | 9 |
| 19 | Mekonnen TC. | 2017 | 2015 | Southern | Urban | CS | 623 | 6–23m | NR | 27.1 | 67.6 | 20.7 | 10 |
| 20 | Hibstu DT. | 2018 | 2016 | Southern | Urban | CS | 320 | 6–23m | 57.8 | NR | NR | NR | 10 |
| 21 | Demilew YM. | 2017 | 2016 | Northwest | Urban | CS | 278 | 6–23m | 78.1 | 7.2 | 47.1 | 7.2 | 9 |
| 22 | Ayana D. | 2017 | 2015 | Northwest | R&U | CS | 785 | 6–23m | 61.8 | 10.7 | NR | NR | 10 |
| 23 | Kumera G. | 2018 | 2016 | North west | R&U | CS | 955 | 6–23m | NR | 13.6 | NR | NR | 10 |
| 24 | Mekbib E. | 2014 | 2013 | Northern | Urban | CS | 428 | 6–23m | 79.7 | 17.8 | 39.7 | 11.9 | 9 |
| 25 | Agedew E. | 2014 | 2014 | Southern | Rural | CS | 562 | 6–24m | 40.6 | NR | NR | NR | 11 |
| 26 | Semahegn A. | 2014 | 2013 | East | Urban | CS | 200 | 6–23m | 60.5 | NR | NR | NR | 7 |
Abrevations: CC: case-control, CS: Cross-sectional, NR: Not reported, TI: Timely initiation, MDD: Minimum dietary diverstiy, MMF: Minimum meal frequency, MAD: Minimum acceptable diet, m: month.
Fig. 2Forest plot of the prevalence of minimum dietary diversity with the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs). According to the author and year, the midpoint of each line illustrates the estimated prevalence in each study. The diamond design shows the prevalence throughout the studies.
Collective results of the random pooled, subgroups and sensitivity analyses of prevalence of core complementary feeding indicators.
| TI | MDD | MMF | MAD | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prev. (95% CI), I2 | Prev. (95% CI), I2 | Prev. (95% CI), I2 | Prev. (95% CI), I2 | |||||
| 14 | 61.0 (52.0, 70.0), 98.5 | 19 | 18.0 (11.0, 25.0), 99.5 | 14 | 56.0 (45.0, 66.0), 99.2 | 8 | 10.0 (7.0, 14.0), 91.5 | |
| 9 | 61.0 (51.0, 72.0), 98.2 | 10 | 16.0 (12.0, 20.0), 95.3 | 8 | 59.0 (51.0, 68.0), 97.0 | 5 | 12.0 (7.0, 16.0), 91.9 | |
| Subgroups | ||||||||
| | ||||||||
| North | 6 | 72.0 (63.0,81.0), 96.7 | 8 | 20.0 (5.0, 36.0), 99.7 | 4 | 53.0 (38.0, 68.0), 97.9 | 2 | 10.0 (7.0, 12.0), 0.0 |
| South | 6 | 50.0 (33.0, 66.0), 94.0 | 8 | 18.0 (8.0, 27.0), 98.7 | 8 | 59.0 (40.0, 77.0), 99.4 | 5 | 10.0 (5.0, 16.0), 94. 8 |
| East | 2 | 61.0 (56.0, 65.0), 0.0 | NA | NA | ||||
| Mixed (country) | NA | NA | 3 | 12.0 (7.0, 17.0), 0.0 | 2 | 45.0 (43.0, 47.0), 0.0 | 1 | 12.0 (8.0, 17.0), 0.0 |
| | ||||||||
| Urban | 5 | 68.0 (59.0, 77.0), 94.0 | 4 | 16.0 (8.0, 24.0), 96.2 | 5 | 42.0 (18.0, 65.0), 99.4 | 3 | 13.0 (6.0, 21.0), 0.0 |
| Rural | 5 | 51.0 (27.0, 75.0), 99.4 | 7 | 10.0 (6.0, 14.0), 93.9 | 5 | 62.0 (53.0, 72.0), 94.1 | 4 | 8.0 (4.0, 11.0), 87.1 |
Abrevations: MAD: Minimum acceptable diet, MMF: Minimum meal freaquency, MDD: Minimum dietary diversity, TI: Timely initiation of complemnetary food.
study number of study.
Summary of Data extracted for determinants of complementary feeding by study.
| Study's First Author last Name, (Year) | Determinants of minimum dietary diversity | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Child age | Maternal education | Maternal knowledge on IYCF | Paternal involvement | Mass media | Maternal DD | SES | Cooking demo | Home gardening | |
| Dangura D. et al. (2017) | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | |||
| Roba KT. et al. (2016) | √ | √ | |||||||
| Aemro M. et al. (2013) | √ | √ | √ | ||||||
| Beyene M. et al. (2015) | √ | √ | √ | √ | |||||
| Tegegne M. et al. (2017) | √ | √ | |||||||
| Regassa N. (2014) | √ | √ | |||||||
| Nguyen P.H. et al. (2013) | √ | √ | √ | ||||||
| Gebremedhin S. et al. (2016) | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | ||
| Bilal S.M. et al. (2016) | √ | ||||||||
| Mekonnen TC. et al. (2017) | √ | ||||||||
Abrevations: DD: Dietary diversity, SES: Socioeconomic status, demo: demonstration, ANC: Antinatal care, PNC: Postnatal care.
Pooled odds ratios for the determinants of timely initaition of complementary feeding.
| Determinants | Comparison | Number of studies | Sample size | OR (95% CI), I2 (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maternal education | More edu (vs. less) | 5 | 2268 | 2.67 (1.80, 3.54), 0.0 |
| PNC follow up | Yes (vs. No) | 4 | 2090 | 1.76 (1.34, 2.18), 0.0 |
| Paternal education | More edu (vs. less) | 3 | 1165 | 2.67 (1.33, 4.00), 0.0 |
| ANC follow up | Yes (vs. No) | 3 | 1043 | 3.08 (1.58, 4.57), 0.0 |
| Number of children | More (vs. less) | 2 | 1207 | 1.76 (1.01, 2.50), 34.7 |
| Place of Delivery | Health Inst. (vs. Home) | 2 | 621 | 2.46 (1.32, 3.59), 0.0 |
Abrevations: edu: education, Inst: Institute.
Pooled odds ratios for the determinants of minimum dietary diversity.
| Determinants | Comparison | Number of studies | Sample size | OR (95% CI), I2 (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Child age | Older (vs. younger) | 8 | 9061 | 1.29 (1.19, 1.38), 95.5 |
| Maternal education | More edu (vs. less) | 5 | 7731 | 1.36 (1.09, 1.62), 88.8 |
| Maternal knowledge | knows IYCF (vs. not) | 4 | 4173 | 1.07 (0.98, 1.17), 72.4 |
| Paternal involvement | Involved (vs. not) | 3 | 3337 | 1.18 (1.07, 1.29), 41.2 |
| Media | IYCF info. (vs. not) | 3 | 3417 | 1.25 (1.01, 1.49), 83.8 |
| Maternal DDS | Yes (vs. No) | 2 | 1091 | 1.26 (1.19, 1.34), 0.0 |
| SES | Higher (vs. lower) | 2 | 4916 | 1.18 (1.02, 1.33), 54.2 |
| Cooking demo | Yes (vs. No) | 2 | 1337 | 1.23 (1.11, 1.36), 0.0 |
| Home gardening | Yes (vs. No) | 2 | 2497 | 1.39 (1.23, 1.54), 0.0 |
Abrevations: edu: education, demo: demonstration.
Fig. 3Funnel plot of the prevalence of minimum dietary diversity studies.