| Literature DB >> 31316919 |
Karina M Rebello1, Valter V Andrade-Neto2, Claudia Regina B Gomes3, Marcos Vinícius N de Souza3, Marta H Branquinha4, André L S Santos4, Eduardo Caio Torres-Santos2, Claudia M d'Avila-Levy1.
Abstract
Concurrently, leishmaniasis and AIDS are global public health issues and the overlap between these diseases adds additional treats to the management of co-infected patients. Lopinavir (LPV) has a well characterized anti-HIV and leishmanicidal action, and to analyze its combined action with miltefosine (MFS) could help to envisage strategies to the management of co-infected patients. Here, we evaluate the interaction between LPV and MFS against Leishmania infantum infection by in vitro and in vivo approaches. The effect of the compounds alone or in association was assessed for 72 h in mouse peritoneal macrophages infected with L. infantum by the determination of the IC50s and FICIs. Subsequently, mice were orally treated twice daily during 5 days with the compounds alone or in association and evaluated after 30 days. The in vitro assays revealed an IC50 of 0.24 μM and 9.89 μM of MFS and LPV, respectively, and an additive effect of the compounds (FICI 1.28). The in vivo assays revealed that LPV alone reduced the parasite load in the spleen and liver by 52 and 40%, respectively. The combined treatment of infected BALB/c mice revealed that the compounds alone required at least two times higher doses than when administered in association to virtually eliminate the parasite. Mice plasma biochemical parameters assessed revealed that the combined therapy did not present any relevant hepatotoxicity. In conclusion, the association of MFS with LPV allowed a reduction in each compound concentration to achieve the same outcome in the treatment of visceral leishmaniasis. Although a pronounced synergistic effect was not evidenced, it does not discard that such combination could be useful in humans co-infected with HIV and Leishmania parasites.Entities:
Keywords: HIV; HIV-PI; chemotherapy; co-infection; leishmaniasis; treatment
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31316919 PMCID: PMC6611157 DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2019.00229
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Cell Infect Microbiol ISSN: 2235-2988 Impact factor: 5.293
Figure 1Citotoxicity of MFS and LPV to peritoneal macrophages. Cells (1 × 106 cells/mL) were incubated in 96 well plates for 72 h in the presence of MFS (A) and LPV (B) at different concentrations. The viability of macrophages was assessed by using the Alamar blue assay. Data represent the mean (±SD) of three independent experiments. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, and ***P < 0.001.
Figure 2Antiamastigote activity of MFS, LPV, and their combination. Peritoneal macrophages infected with L. infantum were treated with MFS (A), LPV (B), or both drugs associated (C) for 72 h at 37°C. (C) Isobologram analysis of antiamastigote activity of drugs combined in several proportions. Each plotted point in the isobolograms is the IC50 of the drug alone or in combination. The straight dashed line represents the theoretical line of additivity for each combination. Data are representative of three independent experiments and values are expressed in mean ± SD in (A,B) and ± SEM in (C).
Figure 3Efficacy of MFS alone or in combination with LPV in L. infantum in vivo infection. Evaluation of hepatic (A) and splenic parasite burden (B) 30 days post-infection. CI, infected control. Animals were treated in day 7 post-infection by oral gavage twice daily for 5 days with a 12 h interval between doses. Data are presented as the mean ± SD. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ****P < 0.0001 versus CI. #P < 0.05 vs. MFS 3.85; ##P < 0.01 vs. MFS 3.85.
Figure 4Relative organ weights of mice in different treatment with MFS alone or in combination with LPV. (A) Liver, (B) Spleen. Animals were treated in day 7 post-infection by oral gavage twice daily for 5 days with a 12 h interval between doses. The control group (CI) was treated with 1% DMSO in saline via the oral route. A non-infected and non-treated control group (CNI) was also evaluated. *P < 0.05 vs. CNI; **P < 0.01 vs. CNI; #P < 0.05 vs. CI.