| Literature DB >> 31315183 |
Dawrin Pech-Puch1, Jaime Rodríguez2, Bastien Cautain3, Carlos Alfredo Sandoval-Castro4, Carlos Jiménez5.
Abstract
Two new spongian furanoditerpenes, 3β-hydroxyspongia-13(16),14-dien-2-one (1) and 19-dehydroxy-spongian diterpene 17 (2), along with five known terpenes, the spongian furanoditerpenes 9-nor-3-hydroxyspongia-3,13(16),14-trien-2-one (3), 3β,19 dihydroxyspongia-13(16),14-dien-2-one (epispongiadiol) (4) and spongian diterpene 17 (5), the furanoditerpene ambliol C (6), and the sesterterpene scalarin (7), were isolated from the methanolic extract of the sponge Spongia tubulifera, collected in the Mexican Caribbean. The planar structures of the new compounds were elucidated by 1D/2D NMR and IR spectroscopic analysis, high resolution electrospray mass spectrometry (HRESIMS), and comparison of their spectral data with those reported in the literature. Absolute configurations were determined by comparison of the experimental electronic circular dichroism (ECD) spectrum with those calculated by time-dependent density functional theory (TDDFT). Compounds 1, 4, and 6 displayed weak cytotoxic activity against different human tumour cell lines.Entities:
Keywords: ECD-TDDFT; Spongia tubulifera; cytotoxicity; marine sponge; spongian furanoditerpenes
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31315183 PMCID: PMC6669439 DOI: 10.3390/md17070416
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mar Drugs ISSN: 1660-3397 Impact factor: 5.118
Figure 1Structures of 1–7 isolated from Spongia tubulifera.
13C (125 MHz) and 1H (500 MHz) NMR Data in CDCl3 of 1 and 2.
| Position | 1 | 2 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| δC, type | δH, mult. ( | δC mult. | δH, mult. ( | |
| 1 | 53.3, CH | 2.67, d (12.1) | 128.3, CH | 6.54, s |
| 2.13, d (12.1) | ||||
| 2 | 211.1, C | 144.3, C | ||
| 3 | 83.1, CH | 3.90, d (1.5) | 201.2, C | |
| 4 | 45.7, C | 44.3, C | ||
| 5 | 55.0, C | 1.62, m | 54.5, C | 1.80, m |
| 6 | 18.6, CH2 | 1.66, m | 19.1, CH2 | 1.67, m |
| 1.80, m | ||||
| 7 | 40.7, CH2 | 1.68, m | 40.4, CH2 | 1.66, m |
| 2.20, m | 2.18, m | |||
| 8 | 34.7, C | 34.9, C | ||
| 9 | 56.1, CH | 1.50, m | 51.7, CH | 1.48, dd (11.8, 1.7) |
| 10 | 43.8, C | 38.8, C | ||
| 11 | 18.9, CH2 | 1.67, m | 18.8, CH2 | 1.91, dt (7.0, 1.7) |
| 12 | 20.7, CH2 | 2.49, m | 20.7, CH2 | 2.51, dddd (16.2, 12.2, 7.0, 1.7) |
| 2.82, m | 2.83, ddt (16.2, 6.3, 1.5) | |||
| 13 | 119.4, C | 119.5, C | ||
| 14 | 136.8, C | 137.3, C | ||
| 15 | 135.3, CH | 7.12, s | 135.0, CH | 7.09, s |
| 16 | 137.1, CH | 7.07, s | 137.2, CH | 7.06, s |
| 17 | 26.0, CH3 | 1.23, s | 26.7, CH3 | 1.28, s |
| 18 | 29.4, CH3 | 1.21, s | 20.6, CH3 | 1.16, s |
| 19 | 16.5, CH3 | 0.73, s | 27.3, CH3 | 1.23, s |
| 20 | 17.3, CH3 | 0.88, s | 21.7, CH3 | 1.22, s |
| OH | 3.48, d (1.5) | 5.93, s | ||
Figure 2Key 1H-1H COSY, NOESY, and HMBC correlations of 1 and 2.
Figure 3Experimental electronic circular dichroism (ECD) spectrum (black line) of 1 and calculated ECD spectrum (red line) for (3R,5R,8R,9R,10R)-1 and (blue line) for (3S,5S,8S,9S,10S)-1.
Figure 4Experimental ECD spectrum (black line) of 2 and calculated ECD spectrum (red line) for (5R,8R,9R,10R)-2 and (blue line) for (5S,8S,9S,10S)-2.
Cytotoxic Activity Data (IC50 in µM) of 1, 4, and 6 a.
| Tumour Cell Lines | Compound | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | 6 | Doxorubicin | |
| A549 (lung) | 88.1 ± 7.9 | 73.7 ± 6.3 | 28.3 ± 2.1 | 0.4 ± 0.2 |
| A2058 (skin) | 71.4 ± 2.5 | 53.9 ± 0.6 | 22.9 ± 0.7 | 0.1 ± 0.1 |
| HepG2 (hepatocyte) | 91.3 ± 15.8 | 60.1 ± 5.0 | 24.3 ± 0.2 | 0.1 ± 0.1 |
| MCF-7 (breast) | nd | nd | 19.9 ± 3.3 | 5.1 ± 0.5 |
| MiaPaca-2 (pancreas) | 90.0 ± 44.8 | nd | 11.7 ± 0.9 | 6.6 ± 0.5 |
a IC50, compound concentration that produces 50% inhibition on cell growth as compared to control cells. nd: not detected.