Janna R Gordon1, Sharon H Baik2, Karen T G Schwartz1, Kristen J Wells1,3. 1. San Diego State University/University of California, San Diego Joint Doctoral Program in Clinical Psychology, San Diego, California. 2. Department of Medical Social Sciences, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois. 3. Department of Psychology, San Diego State University, San Diego, California.
Abstract
Purpose: Sexual minority (SM) individuals are more likely to experience mental health concerns than heterosexual individuals. However, little is known to date about the psychological needs of SM cancer survivors. The objective of this systematic review was to identify whether SM cancer survivors experience disparate psychological outcomes compared with heterosexual cancer survivors. Methods: PubMed/MEDLINE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Web of Science, and ProQuest databases were searched systematically to identify studies that compared mental health outcomes between SM and heterosexual survivors. A standardized data extraction form was used to extract data from eligible articles. The Joanna Briggs Institute Checklist for Analytical Cross Sectional Studies was used to assess study quality. Results: Twelve studies met the inclusion criteria and assessed distress, depression, anxiety, perceived stress, and mental and emotional quality of life (QOL). Most studies enrolled survivors diagnosed either with female breast cancer or with prostate cancer. Most studies reporting on mental health among women found no differences between SM and heterosexual survivors. Studies conducted among men found that SM survivors experienced higher distress, depression, and anxiety, and lower emotional/mental QOL than heterosexual survivors. Conclusion: The findings of the present synthesis suggest that mental health disparities may exist among SM men diagnosed with cancer, particularly prostate cancer. More research is required to identify mental health disparities among SM survivors diagnosed with other cancers, as well as predisposing and protective factors. In addition, mental health screening and interventions are needed for SM men after cancer diagnosis.
Purpose: Sexual minority (SM) individuals are more likely to experience mental health concerns than heterosexual individuals. However, little is known to date about the psychological needs of SM cancer survivors. The objective of this systematic review was to identify whether SM cancer survivors experience disparate psychological outcomes compared with heterosexual cancer survivors. Methods: PubMed/MEDLINE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Web of Science, and ProQuest databases were searched systematically to identify studies that compared mental health outcomes between SM and heterosexual survivors. A standardized data extraction form was used to extract data from eligible articles. The Joanna Briggs Institute Checklist for Analytical Cross Sectional Studies was used to assess study quality. Results: Twelve studies met the inclusion criteria and assessed distress, depression, anxiety, perceived stress, and mental and emotional quality of life (QOL). Most studies enrolled survivors diagnosed either with female breast cancer or with prostate cancer. Most studies reporting on mental health among women found no differences between SM and heterosexual survivors. Studies conducted among men found that SM survivors experienced higher distress, depression, and anxiety, and lower emotional/mental QOL than heterosexual survivors. Conclusion: The findings of the present synthesis suggest that mental health disparities may exist among SM men diagnosed with cancer, particularly prostate cancer. More research is required to identify mental health disparities among SM survivors diagnosed with other cancers, as well as predisposing and protective factors. In addition, mental health screening and interventions are needed for SM men after cancer diagnosis.
Entities:
Keywords:
cancer; cancer survivors; health care disparities; mental health; sexual minorities
Authors: Kenneth H Mayer; Judith B Bradford; Harvey J Makadon; Ron Stall; Hilary Goldhammer; Stewart Landers Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2008-04-29 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: P Fobair; K O'Hanlan; C Koopman; C Classen; S Dimiceli; N Drooker; D Warner; H Davids; J Loulan; D Wallsten; D Goffinet; G Morrow; D Spiegel Journal: Psychooncology Date: 2001 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 3.894
Authors: Frank J Penedo; Ivan Molton; Jason R Dahn; Biing-Jiun Shen; Dave Kinsinger; Lara Traeger; Scott Siegel; Neil Schneiderman; Michael Antoni Journal: Ann Behav Med Date: 2006-06
Authors: Frank J Penedo; Jason R Dahn; Ivan Molton; Jeffrey S Gonzalez; David Kinsinger; Bernard A Roos; Charles S Carver; Neil Schneiderman; Michael H Antoni Journal: Cancer Date: 2004-01-01 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Michael King; Joanna Semlyen; Sharon See Tai; Helen Killaspy; David Osborn; Dmitri Popelyuk; Irwin Nazareth Journal: BMC Psychiatry Date: 2008-08-18 Impact factor: 3.630
Authors: Joseph Lombardo; Kevin Ko; Ayako Shimada; Nicolas Nelson; Christopher Wright; Jerry Chen; Alisha Maity; Marissa L Ruggiero; Scott Richard; Dimitrios Papanagnou; Edith Mitchell; Amy Leader; Nicole L Simone Journal: Cancer Causes Control Date: 2022-01-04 Impact factor: 2.532
Authors: Tess Thompson; Katie Heiden-Rootes; Miriam Joseph; L Anne Gilmore; LaShaune Johnson; Christine M Proulx; Emily L Albright; Maria Brown; Jane A McElroy Journal: Soc Sci Med Date: 2020-07-18 Impact factor: 4.634
Authors: Ulrike Boehmer; Al Ozonoff; Michael Winter; Flora Berklein; Jennifer Potter; Kevan L Hartshorn; Kevin C Ward; Rachel M Ceballos; Melissa A Clark Journal: Cancer Date: 2021-07-08 Impact factor: 6.921
Authors: Alexandra Schefter; Lauren Thomaier; Patricia Jewett; Katherine Brown; Ashley E Stenzel; Anne Blaes; Deanna Teoh; Rachel I Vogel Journal: Cancer Rep (Hoboken) Date: 2021-05-31
Authors: Milli J Desai; Rebecca S Gold; Chelsea K Jones; Hena Din; Andrew C Dietz; Ksenya Shliakhtsitsava; Maria Elena Martinez; Florin Vaida; Hui-Chun Irene Su Journal: J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol Date: 2020-07-27 Impact factor: 2.223