Lauren A May1,2, Siddharth P Jadhav3, R Paul Guillerman3, Pamela D Ketwaroo3, Prakash Masand3, Melissa M Carbajal4, Rajesh Krishnamurthy5. 1. Edward B. Singleton Department of Pediatric Radiology, Texas Children's Hospital, 6701 Fannin St., Suite 470, Houston, TX, 77030, USA. Lauren.a.may10.mil@mail.mil. 2. Department of Radiology, San Antonio Military Medical Center, Fort Sam Houston, San Antonio, TX, USA. Lauren.a.may10.mil@mail.mil. 3. Edward B. Singleton Department of Pediatric Radiology, Texas Children's Hospital, 6701 Fannin St., Suite 470, Houston, TX, 77030, USA. 4. Section of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA. 5. Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) is a key mechanical ventilator setting in infants with bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD). Excessive PEEP can result in insufficient carbon dioxide elimination and lung damage, while insufficient PEEP can result in impaired gas exchange secondary to airway and alveolar collapse. Determining PEEP settings based on clinical parameters alone is challenging and variable. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to describe our experience using dynamic airway CT to determine the lowest PEEP setting sufficient to maintain expiratory central airway patency of at least 50% of the inspiratory cross-sectional area in children with BPD requiring long-term ventilator support. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively identified all infants with BPD who underwent volumetric CT with a dynamic airway protocol for PEEP optimization from December 2014 through April 2019. Sixteen infants with BPD underwent 17 CT exams. Each CT exam consisted of acquisitions spanning the trachea and mainstem bronchi. We measured cross-sectional area of the trachea and mainstem bronchi and qualitatively assessed the amount of atelectasis. We documented changes in management as a result of the CT exam. RESULTS: The average effective dose was 0.1-0.8 mSv/scan. Of 17 CT exams, PEEP was increased in 9, decreased in 3 and unchanged after 5 exams. CONCLUSION: Dynamic airway CT shows promise to assist the clinician in determining PEEP settings to maintain airway patency in infants with BPD requiring long-term ventilator support. Further evaluation of the impact of this maneuver on gas exchange, cardiac output and other physiological measures is needed.
BACKGROUND: Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) is a key mechanical ventilator setting in infants with bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD). Excessive PEEP can result in insufficientcarbon dioxide elimination and lung damage, while insufficient PEEP can result in impaired gas exchange secondary to airway and alveolar collapse. Determining PEEP settings based on clinical parameters alone is challenging and variable. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to describe our experience using dynamic airway CT to determine the lowest PEEP setting sufficient to maintain expiratory central airway patency of at least 50% of the inspiratory cross-sectional area in children with BPD requiring long-term ventilator support. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively identified all infants with BPD who underwent volumetric CT with a dynamic airway protocol for PEEP optimization from December 2014 through April 2019. Sixteen infants with BPD underwent 17 CT exams. Each CT exam consisted of acquisitions spanning the trachea and mainstem bronchi. We measured cross-sectional area of the trachea and mainstem bronchi and qualitatively assessed the amount of atelectasis. We documented changes in management as a result of the CT exam. RESULTS: The average effective dose was 0.1-0.8 mSv/scan. Of 17 CT exams, PEEP was increased in 9, decreased in 3 and unchanged after 5 exams. CONCLUSION: Dynamic airway CT shows promise to assist the clinician in determining PEEP settings to maintain airway patency in infants with BPD requiring long-term ventilator support. Further evaluation of the impact of this maneuver on gas exchange, cardiac output and other physiological measures is needed.
Authors: Phillip M Boiselle; David Feller-Kopman; Simon Ashiku; Dawn Weeks; Armin Ernst Journal: Radiol Clin North Am Date: 2003-05 Impact factor: 2.303
Authors: Keith J Strauss; Marilyn J Goske; Alexander J Towbin; Debapriya Sengupta; Michael J Callahan; Kassa Darge; Daniel J Podberesky; Donald P Frush; Charles Maxfield; Sjirk J Westra; Jeffrey S Prince; Huimin Wu; Mythreyi Bhargavan-Chatfield Journal: Radiology Date: 2017-02-17 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Nicolas A Bamat; James P Guevara; Matthew Bryan; Robin S Roberts; Bradley A Yoder; Brigitte Lemyre; Aaron Chiu; David Millar; Haresh Kirpalani Journal: J Pediatr Date: 2017-12-22 Impact factor: 4.406
Authors: Erik B Hysinger; Nicholas L Friedman; Michael A Padula; Russell T Shinohara; Huayan Zhang; Howard B Panitch; Steven M Kawut Journal: Ann Am Thorac Soc Date: 2017-06-16
Authors: Nara S Higano; Alister J Bates; Chamindu C Gunatilaka; Erik B Hysinger; Paul J Critser; Russel Hirsch; Jason C Woods; Robert J Fleck Journal: Pediatr Radiol Date: 2022-02-05