Literature DB >> 28212059

Pediatric Chest CT Diagnostic Reference Ranges: Development and Application.

Keith J Strauss1, Marilyn J Goske1, Alexander J Towbin1, Debapriya Sengupta1, Michael J Callahan1, Kassa Darge1, Daniel J Podberesky1, Donald P Frush1, Charles Maxfield1, Sjirk J Westra1, Jeffrey S Prince1, Huimin Wu1, Mythreyi Bhargavan-Chatfield1.   

Abstract

Purpose To determine diagnostic reference ranges on the basis of the size of a pediatric patient's chest and to develop a method to estimate computed tomographic (CT) scanner-specific mean size-specific dose estimates (SSDEs) as a function of patient size and the radiation output of each CT scanner at a site. Materials and Methods The institutional review boards of each center approved this retrospective, HIPAA-compliant, multicenter study; informed consent was waived. CT dose indexes (SSDE, volume CT dose index, and dose length product) of 518 pediatric patients (mean age, 9.6 years; male patients, 277 [53%]) who underwent CT between July 1, 2012, and June 30, 2013, according to the guidelines of the Quality Improvement Registry in CT Scans in Children were retrieved from a national dose data registry. Diagnostic reference ranges were developed after analysis of image quality of a subset of 111 CT examinations to validate image quality at the lower bound. Pediatric dose reduction factors were calculated on the basis of SSDEs for pediatric patients divided by SSDEs for adult patients. Results Diagnostic reference ranges (SSDEs) were 1.8-3.9, 2.2-4.5, 2.7-5.1, 3.6-6.6, and 5.5-8.4 mGy for effective diameter ranges of less than 15 cm, 15-19 cm, 20-24 cm, 25-29 cm, and greater than or equal to 30 cm, respectively. The fractions of adult doses (pediatric dose reduction factors) used within the consortium for patients with lateral dimensions of 8, 11, 14, 17, 20, 23, 26, 29, 32, 35, and 38 cm were 0.29, 0.33, 0.38, 0.44, 0.50, 0.58, 0.66, 0.76, 0.87, 1.0, and 1.15, respectively. Conclusion Diagnostic reference ranges developed in this study provided target ranges of pediatric dose indexes on the basis of patient size, while the pediatric dose reduction factors of this study allow calculation of unique reference dose indexes on the basis of patient size for each of a site's CT scanners. © RSNA, 2017 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28212059     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2017161530

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  9 in total

1.  A comparison study of size-specific dose estimate calculation methods.

Authors:  Roshni A Parikh; Michael A Wien; Ronald D Novak; David W Jordan; Paul Klahr; Stephanie Soriano; Leslie Ciancibello; Sheila C Berlin
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2017-09-27

Review 2.  Radiation use in diagnostic imaging in children: approaching the value of the pediatric radiology community.

Authors:  Donald P Frush; Erich Sorantin
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2021-03-20

3.  Individual radiation exposure from computed tomography: a survey of paediatric practice in French university hospitals, 2010-2013.

Authors:  Neige M Y Journy; Serge Dreuil; Nathalie Boddaert; Jean-François Chateil; Didier Defez; Hubert Ducou-le-Pointe; Jean-Marc Garcier; Joël Guersen; Bouchra Habib Geryes; Andreas Jahnen; Choonsik Lee; Jacqueline Payen-de-la-Garanderie; Jean-Pierre Pracros; Dominique Sirinelli; Isabelle Thierry-Chef; Marie-Odile Bernier
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-08-23       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  A novel approach using volumetric dynamic airway computed tomography to determine positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) settings to maintain airway patency in ventilated infants with bronchopulmonary dysplasia.

Authors:  Lauren A May; Siddharth P Jadhav; R Paul Guillerman; Pamela D Ketwaroo; Prakash Masand; Melissa M Carbajal; Rajesh Krishnamurthy
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2019-07-16

5.  Establishment of Local Diagnostic Reference Levels of Pediatric Abdominopelvic and Chest CT Examinations Based on the Body Weight and Size in Korea.

Authors:  Jae Yeon Hwang; Young Hun Choi; Hee Mang Yoon; Young Jin Ryu; Hyun Joo Shin; Hyun Gi Kim; So Mi Lee; Sun Kyung You; Ji Eun Park
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 3.500

6.  Effect of arm position, presence of medical devices, and off-centering during acquisition of scout image on automatic tube voltage selection and current modulation in pediatric chest CT.

Authors:  Young Jin Ryu; Young Hun Choi; Jung-Eun Cheon; Ji Eun Park; Woo Sun Kim; In-One Kim
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-04-17       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Can Patient's Body Weight Represent Body Diameter for Pediatric Size-Specific Dose Estimate in Thoracic and Abdominal Computed Tomography?

Authors:  Supika Kritsaneepaiboon; Suwadee Eng-Chuan; Saowapark Yoykaew
Journal:  J Clin Imaging Sci       Date:  2019-05-24

8.  CT Examinations for COVID-19: A Systematic Review of Protocols, Radiation Dose, and Numbers Needed to Diagnose and Predict.

Authors:  Jong Hyuk Lee; Hyunsook Hong; Hyungjin Kim; Chang Hyun Lee; Jin Mo Goo; Soon Ho Yoon
Journal:  Taehan Yongsang Uihakhoe Chi       Date:  2021-11-04

9.  Ultra-low-dose chest computed tomography without anesthesia in the assessment of pediatric pulmonary diseases.

Authors:  Cristina Manera Dorneles; Gabriel Sartori Pacini; Matheus Zanon; Stephan Altmayer; Guilherme Watte; Marcelo C Barros; Edson Marchiori; Matteo Baldisserotto; Bruno Hochhegger
Journal:  J Pediatr (Rio J)       Date:  2018-09-17       Impact factor: 2.990

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.