| Literature DB >> 31311552 |
Cyrille K Diédhiou1,2, Rahama A Moussa2, Amy K Bei2,3,4, Rachel Daniels3, Nasserdine Papa Mze1,2, Daouda Ndiaye4, Ngor Faye5, Dyann Wirth3, Alfred Amambua-Ngwa6, Souleymane Mboup1, Ambroise D Ahouidi7,8.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The Plasmodium falciparum reticulocyte binding protein homolog 2b (PfRh2b) is an important P. falciparum merozoite ligand that mediates invasion of erythrocytes by interacting with a chymotrypsin-sensitive "receptor Z". A large deletion polymorphism is found in the c-terminal ectodomain of this protein in many countries around the world, resulting in a truncated, but expressed protein. The varying frequencies by region suggest that there could be region specific immune selection at this locus. Therefore, this study was designed to determine temporal changes in the PfRh2b deletion polymorphism in infected individuals from Thiès (Senegal) and Western Gambia (The Gambia). It was also sought to determine the selective pressures acting at this locus and whether prevalence of the deletion in isolates genotyped by a 24-SNP molecular barcode is linked to background genotype or whether there might be independent selection acting at this locus.Entities:
Keywords: Gambia; PfRh2b; Plasmodium falciparum; SNPs; Senegal
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31311552 PMCID: PMC6636118 DOI: 10.1186/s12936-019-2868-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Malar J ISSN: 1475-2875 Impact factor: 2.979
Fig. 1Evolution of PfRh2b deletion in Thiès (a) and Western Gambia (b). Scheme showing the variation in the prevalence of PfRh2b deletion over the time, including mixed infections (PfRh2 full-length and PfRh2b deletion) in both areas using formula described previously by Ahouidi et al. [10]. Alleles frequencies of the dimorphic PfRh2b gene were determined using semi-nested Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR). a A decrease of PfRh2b deletion from 2007 to 2013 in Thiès was noted. b A fluctuation of this deletion from 1984 to 2013 in The Gambia was observed. N, number of isolates; Del, deletion
Fig. 2Percentage of PfRh2b deletion according to age groups in Thiès (a) and Western Gambia (b). Variation in the presence of PfRh2b deletion according to age of patients from two distinct populations. a In Thiès, the median age of the 651 Patients was 18 years. A significant difference in the presence of PfRh2b deletion was observed (P = 0,037). b In Western Gambia, the median age of the 283 Patients was 5 years. No difference in the presence of PfRh2b deletion was found (P = 0.316). P, P value; ns, not significant; Del, deletion
Allele frequencies used to calculate Fst according to years
| Years | THIES | WESTERN GAMBIA | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| Gene diversity (h) |
|
| Gene diversity (h) | |
| 1984 | – | – | 0.58 | 0.42 | 0.487 | |
| 2005 | – | – | 0.69 | 0.31 | 0.428 | |
| 2007 | 0.67 | 0.33 | 0.442 | 0.47 | 0.53 | 0.498 |
| 2008 | 0.65 | 0.35 | 0.455 | 0.66 | 0.34 | 0.449 |
| 2009 | 0.58 | 0.42 | 0.487 | – | – | – |
| 2010 | 0.39 | 0.61 | 0.372 | 0.73 | 0.27 | 0.394 |
| 2011 | 0.37 | 0.63 | 0.466 | – | – | – |
| 2012 | 0.44 | 0.56 | 0.493 | 0.83 | 0.17 | 0.282 |
| 2013 | 0.38 | 0.62 | 0.471 | 0.58 | 0.42 | 0.487 |
| Average | 0.497 | 0.503 | 0.455 | 0.648 | 0.351 | 0.432 |
Temporal differentiation of PfRh2b polymorphism in Thiès and Western Gambia populations. Fst value was calculated to assess the extent of temporal variation in the frequencies of PfRh2b alleles in both areas. The overall estimated value of Fst from 2007 to 2013 in Thiès was 0.09. In Western Gambia the Fst value from 1984 to 2013 was 0.057
Fst, wright’s fixation index; h, gene diversity
Nucleotide sequence of haplotype clusters in Thiès
| Haplotype cluster | Molecular barcodes | N (%) | N (isolats) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Haplotype cluster 36 | CACTGCAGACCGCACCCAAGCCTG | 0.345 | 2 | 100 | 0 |
| Haplotype cluster 38 | CACTCGAGATCGTCACCACGCTTG | 0.345 | 2 | 0 | 100 |
| Haplotype cluster 45 | TATTCCGGTCCGTCCCCTCGCTTG | 0.345 | 2 | 100 | 0 |
| Haplotype cluster 51 | TACTCCGGTTCGCACACACGACTG | 0.345 | 2 | 100 | 0 |
| Haplotype cluster 49 | TATTCGAAATCGCACCCTAGATTG | 0.345 | 2 | 100 | 0 |
| Haplotype cluster 48 | TACTCCAGTCCATACACACGATTG | 0.345 | 2 | 100 | 0 |
| Haplotype cluster 46 | TACTGCAGATTGTACCCAAAACTG | 0.345 | 2 | 50 | 50 |
| Haplotype cluster 57 | CACTGCGGATTGTACCTAAGACTG | 0.345 | 2 | 50 | 50 |
| Haplotype cluster 54 | CGCTCCAGACTACACCCTAAACTG | 0.345 | 2 | 0 | 100 |
| Haplotype cluster 53 | TACTCCGGATTGTCACCAAGACTG | 0.345 | 2 | 100 | 0 |
| Haplotype cluster 59 | TACTCCGGTTTATACCTTAGACTG | 0.345 | 2 | 0 | 100 |
| Haplotype cluster 61 | TACCGGAGTCCGTACCTAAGCCTG | 0.345 | 2 | 0 | 100 |
| Haplotype cluster 15 | TACTCCGGTTCGTAAACTCGCCTG | 0.345 | 2 | 50 | 50 |
| Haplotype cluster 63 | TACTCCAGACCGCCCCTAAAATTG | 0.345 | 2 | 0 | 100 |
| Haplotype cluster 9 | TATTCCAGATXGCAACTTCGACTG | 0.345 | 2 | 100 | 0 |
| Haplotype cluster 62 | TACTCGAGACTGCNCATACACTTG | 0.345 | 2 | 0 | 100 |
| Haplotype cluster 13 | TACTCGAAACTXCCCATAAGCTTG | 0.345 | 2 | 0 | 100 |
| Haplotype cluster 68 | TACCCCGGACCACCAATAAGACTG | 0.345 | 2 | 0 | 100 |
| Haplotype cluster 69 | TACTGGGATCCGCACCTAAGACTG | 0.345 | 2 | 0 | 100 |
| Haplotype cluster 67 | CACTCCGGATTGCCACTTAGATTG | 0.345 | 2 | 50 | 50 |
| Haplotype cluster 70 | TATTCCGGACXACACACTAGCTTG | 0.345 | 2 | 0 | 100 |
| Haplotype cluster 22 | TACTCCGGATCGCACCCTAGATTG | 0.345 | 2 | 50 | 50 |
| Haplotype cluster 74 | TACTCCAGACTATCCATTCGATTG | 0.345 | 2 | 50 | 50 |
| Haplotype cluster 71 | CACTCGGGATTXCCACTAAGCTTG | 0.345 | 2 | 0 | 100 |
| Haplotype cluster 80 | CATTCCAGTCCXCCAATAAGATTG | 0.345 | 2 | 0 | 100 |
| Haplotype cluster 72 | TATTGGGGATCGCAACCAAGATTG | 0.345 | 2 | 100 | 0 |
| Haplotype cluster 77 | TACTGGAGTCCGTACCTTAGCTTG | 0.345 | 2 | 50 | 50 |
| Haplotype cluster 97 | CACTCGAAATXATACCTTAGCTTG | 0.345 | 2 | 50 | 50 |
| Haplotype cluster 87 | TACTCGGGTCTATAAATAAGACTG | 0.345 | 2 | 0 | 100 |
| Haplotype cluster 89 | TACTCGAGTTTATACCTTAGACTG | 0.345 | 2 | 0 | 100 |
| Haplotype cluster 92 | TATTGCAGTCCXCAAATAAGCTTG | 0.345 | 2 | 0 | 100 |
| Haplotype cluster 84 | CACTCCAGTCCACCACNTAGATTG | 0.345 | 2 | 100 | 0 |
| Haplotype cluster 96 | TATTCCAGACCGCACATTAGCCTG | 0.345 | 2 | 50 | 50 |
| Haplotype cluster 93 | TACTCCAGTCCGTCACTTAGACTG | 0.345 | 2 | 100 | 0 |
| Haplotype cluster 44 | TACTCCAGACTACAACTACGCCTG | 0.345 | 2 | 0 | 100 |
| Haplotype cluster 43 | TATTCCAGATTGCAACTTCGCCTG | 0.517 | 3 | 100 | 0 |
| Haplotype cluster 58 | CACTCGAGTTXACAACCTAGCCTG | 0.517 | 3 | 33 | 67 |
| Haplotype cluster 7 | CACTCCGGATTGCCACTAAGATTG | 0.517 | 3 | 33 | 67 |
| Haplotype cluster 19 | TATTCGAGTCTACACCTTCACTTG | 0.517 | 3 | 100 | 0 |
| Haplotype cluster 21 | TACCCCGGTCCACCACTAAAATTG | 0.517 | 3 | 0 | 100 |
| Haplotype cluster 23 | CACCCGAGTCCACCAACAAGACTG | 0.517 | 3 | 0 | 100 |
| Haplotype cluster 95 | CACCCCGAATCXCACCTAAGACTG | 0.517 | 3 | 0 | 100 |
| Haplotype cluster 99 | TACTCCGAACTGCACATTAGATTG | 0.517 | 3 | 100 | 0 |
| Haplotype cluster 55 | TACTCCGGTTTGCACACACGACTG | 0.69 | 4 | 100 | 0 |
| Haplotype cluster 64 | TACTCGAGATXATACATACACTTG | 0.69 | 4 | 0 | 100 |
| Haplotype cluster 10 | CATTGCGATCTGCAACCTAAACTG | 0.69 | 4 | 100 | 0 |
| Haplotype cluster 24 | CATTCCAGTCCXCCCATTAGATTG | 0.69 | 4 | 25 | 75 |
| Haplotype cluster 81 | TACTCCAGATCGCACCCAAGCCTG | 0.69 | 4 | 75 | 25 |
| Haplotype cluster 98 | CACTCGAGTTTACAACTAAGATTG | 0.69 | 4 | 25 | 75 |
| Haplotype cluster 5 | TACTCGAAACTGCCCATAAGCTTG | 0.69 | 4 | 0 | 100 |
| Haplotype cluster 65 | CACTCCAAATCGTACCTTAGATTG | 0.862 | 5 | 100 | 0 |
| Haplotype cluster 8 | TACCCCGGTCCACACCTTAACTTG | 0.862 | 5 | 100 | 0 |
| Haplotype cluster 11 | TACTCGAGATCATACATACACTTG | 0.862 | 5 | 0 | 100 |
| Haplotype cluster 12 | CACTGCGATCTGCAACCTAAACTG | 0.862 | 5 | 100 | 0 |
| Haplotype cluster 6 | CATTCCAGTCCGCCAATAAGATTG | 1.034 | 6 | 0 | 100 |
| Haplotype cluster 26 | CACTCCAGTCCGTCACCAAGATTG | 1.034 | 6 | 17 | 83 |
| Haplotype cluster 17 | TACCCCGGTCCACCAATAAGATTG | 1.207 | 7 | 0 | 100 |
| Haplotype cluster 16 | TACTCCAGATTACAACCTAGCCTG | 1.207 | 7 | 100 | 0 |
| Haplotype cluster 66 | TGTTCCAGTTTATCACCACGCCTG | 1.379 | 8 | 12.50 | 87.50 |
| Haplotype cluster 18 | TATTCCAGTCCACCCATAAGACTG | 1.552 | 9 | 89 | 11 |
| Haplotype cluster 4 | TACTCCGGTTXGCACACACGACTG | 2.586 | 15 | 100 | 0 |
| Haplotype cluster 29 | TACCCCGGTCCACCAATAAGACTG | 7.241 | 42 | 9.50 | 90.50 |
| UNIQUES | 58.27 | 338 | 49.11 | 50.89 |
N, number of isolates; PfRh2bdel, deletion present; PfRh2bfull, full-length sequence
Frequency of the deletion over time within each cluster that contain only the deletion
Fig. 3Evolution over time of PfRh2b deletion in haplotype clusters having only the deletion in Thiès
Fig. 4Percentage of isolates of cluster-group and unique based on PfRh2b polymorphism in Thiès. Scheme showing the association between the polymorphism of PfRh2b gene and specific barcode of parasite. “Haplotype clusters” which had n = 4 samples were represented. Haplotype cluster 55; 10; 65; 8; 12; 16 and 4 had only the deletion of PfRh2b gene (Blue pie chart); Haplotype cluster 64; 5; 11; 6 and 17 had only the full-length fragment (orange pie chart). The remaining (Haplotype cluster 24; 31; 98; 26; 66; 18 and 29) were parasites having deletion and full-length alleles. The last pie chart (with n = 338) represented the parasites with unique barcode. Del, deletion; Full, full-length sequence; n, number of isolates
Fig. 5Frequency of deletion by year in haplotype clusters 4 and 16. Monitoring of the population frequency and PfRh2b alleles frequencies of haplotype cluster 4 and 16 over the time. a Haplotype cluster 4 was found in 2008 (n = 12) and 2009 (n = 3), but not in the other years. b Haplotype cluster 16 was present in 2011 (n = 1) and 2012 (n = 6), but not in the other years. Del, deletion; Full, full-length sequence; n, number of isolates