Literature DB >> 12667224

The mechanisms of resistance to antimalarial drugs in Plasmodium falciparum.

Jacques Le Bras1, Rémy Durand.   

Abstract

Drug-resistant malaria is primarily caused by Plasmodium falciparum, a species highly prevalent in tropical Africa, the Amazon region and South-east Asia. It causes severe fever or anaemia that leads to more than a million deaths each year. The emergence of chloroquine resistance has been associated with a dramatic increase in malaria mortality among inhabitants of some endemic regions. The rationale for chemoprophylaxis is weakening as multiple-drug resistance develops against well-tolerated drugs. Plasmodium falciparum drug-resistant malaria originates from chromosome mutations. Analysis by molecular, genetic and biochemical approaches has shown that (i). impaired chloroquine uptake by the parasite vacuole is a common characteristic of resistant strains, and this phenotype is correlated with mutations of the Pfmdr1, Pfcg2 and Pfcrt genes; (ii). one to four point mutations of dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR), the enzyme target of antifolates (pyrimethamine and proguanil) produce a moderate to high level of resistance to these drugs; (iii). the mechanism of resistance to sulfonamides and sulfones involves mutations of dihydropteroate synthase (DHPS), their enzyme target; (iv). treatment with sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine selects for DHFR variants Ile(51), Arg(59), and Asn(108) and for DHPS variants Ser(436), Gly(437), and Glu(540); (v) clones that were resistant to some traditional antimalarial agents acquire resistance to new ones at a high frequency (accelerated resistance to multiple drugs, ARMD). The mechanisms of resistance for amino-alcohols (quinine, mefloquine and halofantrine) are still unclear. Epidemiological studies have established that the frequency of chloroquine resistant mutants varies among isolated parasite populations, while resistance to antifolates is highly prevalent in most malarial endemic countries. Established and strong drug pressure combined with low antiparasitic immunity probably explains the multidrug-resistance encountered in the forests of South-east Asia and South America. In Africa, frequent genetic recombinations in Plasmodium originate from a high level of malaria transmission, and falciparum chloroquine-resistant prevalence seems to stabilize at the same level as chloroquine-sensitive malaria. Nevertheless, resistance levels may differ according to place and time. In vivo and in vitro tests do not provide an adequate accurate map of resistance. Biochemical tools at a low cost are urgently needed for prospective monitoring of resistance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12667224     DOI: 10.1046/j.1472-8206.2003.00164.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fundam Clin Pharmacol        ISSN: 0767-3981            Impact factor:   2.748


  42 in total

Review 1.  Drug resistance and genetic mapping in Plasmodium falciparum.

Authors:  Karen Hayton; Xin-Zhuan Su
Journal:  Curr Genet       Date:  2008-09-18       Impact factor: 3.886

2.  Measuring resistant-genotype transmission of malaria parasites: challenges and prospects.

Authors:  Rashad Abdul-Ghani; Hoda F Farag; Amal F Allam; Ahmed A Azazy
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2014-02-22       Impact factor: 2.289

3.  Pharmacokinetics of ferroquine, a novel 4-aminoquinoline, in asymptomatic carriers of Plasmodium falciparum infections.

Authors:  Christian Supan; Ghyslain Mombo-Ngoma; Matthias P Dal-Bianco; Carmen L Ospina Salazar; Saadou Issifou; Florent Mazuir; Aziz Filali-Ansary; Christophe Biot; Daniel Ter-Minassian; Michael Ramharter; Peter G Kremsner; Bertrand Lell
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2012-03-19       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Upregulation of gametocytogenesis in anti-malarial drug-resistant Plasmodium falciparum.

Authors:  Thavamani Rajapandi
Journal:  J Parasit Dis       Date:  2019-04-03

Review 5.  The molecular basis of antifolate resistance in Plasmodium falciparum: looking beyond point mutations.

Authors:  Adina Heinberg; Laura Kirkman
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2015-02-18       Impact factor: 5.691

6.  Antimalarial drug targets in Plasmodium falciparum predicted by stage-specific metabolic network analysis.

Authors:  Carola Huthmacher; Andreas Hoppe; Sascha Bulik; Hermann-Georg Holzhütter
Journal:  BMC Syst Biol       Date:  2010-08-31

7.  Plasmodium falciparum drug resistance in Madagascar: facing the spread of unusual pfdhfr and pfmdr-1 haplotypes and the decrease of dihydroartemisinin susceptibility.

Authors:  Valérie Andriantsoanirina; Arsène Ratsimbasoa; Christiane Bouchier; Martial Jahevitra; Stéphane Rabearimanana; Rogelin Radrianjafy; Voahangy Andrianaranjaka; Tantely Randriantsoa; Marie Ange Rason; Magali Tichit; Léon Paul Rabarijaona; Odile Mercereau-Puijalon; Rémy Durand; Didier Ménard
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2009-08-24       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Assessing the cost-benefit effect of a Plasmodium falciparum drug resistance mutation on parasite growth in vitro.

Authors:  Gabrielle Fröberg; Pedro Eduardo Ferreira; Andreas Mårtensson; Abdullah Ali; Anders Björkman; José Pedro Gil
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2012-12-03       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Effects of point mutations in Plasmodium falciparum dihydrofolate reductase and dihydropterate synthase genes on clinical outcomes and in vitro susceptibility to sulfadoxine and pyrimethamine.

Authors:  David J Bacon; Doug Tang; Carola Salas; Norma Roncal; Carmen Lucas; Lucia Gerena; Lorena Tapia; A Alejandro Llanos-Cuentas; Coralith Garcia; Lelv Solari; Dennis Kyle; Alan J Magill
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-08-26       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Prevalence of pfmdr1, pfcrt, pfdhfr and pfdhps mutations associated with drug resistance, in Luanda, Angola.

Authors:  Paula Figueiredo; Carla Benchimol; Dinora Lopes; Luís Bernardino; Virgílio E do Rosário; Luís Varandas; Fátima Nogueira
Journal:  Malar J       Date:  2008-11-17       Impact factor: 2.979

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.