Literature DB >> 31311487

Microbial metabolites elicit distinct olfactory and gustatory preferences in bumblebees.

Robert N Schaeffer1,2, Caitlin C Rering3, Isabelle Maalouf2, John J Beck3, Rachel L Vannette2.   

Abstract

Animals such as bumblebees use chemosensory cues to both locate and evaluate essential resources. Increasingly, it is recognized that microbes can alter the quality of foraged resources and produce metabolites that may act as foraging cues. The distinct nature of these chemosensory cues however and their use in animal foraging remain poorly understood. Here, we test the hypothesis that species of nectar-inhabiting microbes differentially influence pollinator attraction and feeding via microbial metabolites produced in nectar. We first examined the electrophysiological potential for bumblebee (Bombus impatiens) antennal olfactory neurons to respond to microbial volatile organic compounds (mVOCs), followed by an olfactory preference test. We also assessed gustatory preferences for microbial-altered nectar through both no-choice and choice feeding assays. Antennal olfactory neurons responded to some mVOCs, and bees preferred nectar solutions inoculated with the bacterium Asaia astilbes over the yeast Metschnikowia reukaufii based on volatiles alone. However, B. impatiens foragers consumed significantly more Metschnikowia-inoculated nectar, suggesting distinct roles for mVOCs and non-volatile metabolites in mediating both attraction and feeding decisions. Collectively, our results suggest that microbial metabolites have significant potential to shape interspecific, plant-pollinator signalling, with consequences for forager learning, economics and floral host reproduction.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Asaia astilbes; Metschnikowia reukaufii; bumblebee; microbial volatile organic compounds; nectar microbes; pollination

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31311487      PMCID: PMC6684982          DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2019.0132

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Lett        ISSN: 1744-9561            Impact factor:   3.703


  19 in total

1.  Analyzing variability in nectar amino acids: composition is less variable than concentration.

Authors:  M C Gardener; M P Gillman
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 2.626

2.  Dosage-dependent impacts of a floral volatile compound on pollinators, larcenists, and the potential for floral evolution in the alpine skypilot Polemonium viscosum.

Authors:  Candace Galen; Rainee Kaczorowski; Sadie L Todd; Jennifer Geib; Robert A Raguso
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 3.926

Review 3.  Pollinator-mediated evolution of floral signals.

Authors:  Florian P Schiestl; Steven D Johnson
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2013-03-05       Impact factor: 17.712

Review 4.  The ecology of insect-yeast relationships and its relevance to human industry.

Authors:  Anne A Madden; Mary Jane Epps; Tadashi Fukami; Rebecca E Irwin; John Sheppard; D Magdalena Sorger; Robert R Dunn
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-03-28       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Contrasting effects of yeasts and bacteria on floral nectar traits.

Authors:  Rachel L Vannette; Tadashi Fukami
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2018-06-08       Impact factor: 4.357

6.  Nectar bacteria, but not yeast, weaken a plant-pollinator mutualism.

Authors:  Rachel L Vannette; Marie-Pierre L Gauthier; Tadashi Fukami
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-12-05       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Yeasts in floral nectar: a quantitative survey.

Authors:  Carlos M Herrera; Clara de Vega; Azucena Canto; María I Pozo
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2009-02-10       Impact factor: 4.357

8.  Yeasts in nectar of an early-blooming herb: sought by bumble bees, detrimental to plant fecundity.

Authors:  Carlos M Herrera; María I Pozo; Mónica Medrano
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 5.499

9.  Honey bees avoid nectar colonized by three bacterial species, but not by a yeast species, isolated from the bee gut.

Authors:  Ashley P Good; Marie-Pierre L Gauthier; Rachel L Vannette; Tadashi Fukami
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Diversity and evolutionary patterns of bacterial gut associates of corbiculate bees.

Authors:  Hauke Koch; Dharam P Abrol; Jilian Li; Paul Schmid-Hempel
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2013-01-24       Impact factor: 6.185

View more
  6 in total

1.  Microbial metabolites elicit distinct olfactory and gustatory preferences in bumblebees.

Authors:  Robert N Schaeffer; Caitlin C Rering; Isabelle Maalouf; John J Beck; Rachel L Vannette
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2019-07-17       Impact factor: 3.703

2.  Nectar-Inhabiting Bacteria Affect Olfactory Responses of an Insect Parasitoid by Altering Nectar Odors.

Authors:  Antonino Cusumano; Patrizia Bella; Ezio Peri; Michael Rostás; Salvatore Guarino; Bart Lievens; Stefano Colazza
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2022-08-01       Impact factor: 4.192

Review 3.  Potential effects of nectar microbes on pollinator health.

Authors:  Valerie N Martin; Robert N Schaeffer; Tadashi Fukami
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2022-05-02       Impact factor: 6.671

Review 4.  Floral traits affecting the transmission of beneficial and pathogenic pollinator-associated microbes.

Authors:  Lynn S Adler; Rebecca E Irwin; Scott H McArt; Rachel L Vannette
Journal:  Curr Opin Insect Sci       Date:  2020-08-28       Impact factor: 5.186

5.  Towards a better understanding of the role of nectar-inhabiting yeasts in plant-animal interactions.

Authors:  Joon Klaps; Bart Lievens; Sergio Álvarez-Pérez
Journal:  Fungal Biol Biotechnol       Date:  2020-01-08

6.  Elevated Temperature May Affect Nectar Microbes, Nectar Sugars, and Bumble Bee Foraging Preference.

Authors:  Kaleigh A Russell; Quinn S McFrederick
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 4.192

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.