Literature DB >> 31309314

Prediction of early discharge after gynaecological oncology surgery within ERAS.

Eric Lambaudie1,2,3, Jérome Mathis4, Christophe Zemmour5,6, Camille Jauffret-Fara4, Elie Toni Mikhael4, Camille Pouliquen7, Renaud Sabatier6,8, Clément Brun7, Marion Faucher7, Djamel Mokart7, Gilles Houvenaeghel4,6.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Enhanced recovery after surgery programs (ERAS) have been proven to decrease the length of hospital stay without increasing readmission rates or complications. However, the patient and operative characteristics that improve the chance of a successful early hospital discharge are not well established. The aim of this study was to design a nomogram which could be used before surgery, using the characteristics of patients, to establish who could benefit from early discharge (POD ≤ 2 days).
METHODS: This observational study has been prospectively conducted. All the included patients were referred for surgical treatment of gynecologic cancer. We defined two sub-groups of patients on surgical procedure characteristics: isolated procedures (hysterectomy or lymphadenectomy) and combined procedures (at least the association of two procedures).
RESULTS: 230 patients were enrolled during the study protocol. 83.9% of patients were treated with a minimally invasive surgery (MIS). 159 patients (69.1%) were discharged on or before POD 2. On multivariate analysis, the surgical approach (open surgery vs. laparoscopy, OR  0.02 (95% CI [0-0.07]), p < 0.001) and the type of surgery (combined procedure versus isolated procedure, OR  0.41 (95% CI [0.18-0.91]), p = 0.028) were found to be significant predictors of increased hospital stay. A nomogram has been built for the purpose of predicting eligible patients for early post-operative discharge based on the multivariate analysis results (AUC = 0.86, 95% CI [0.81-0.92]).
CONCLUSION: The use of MIS for isolated procedures in oncologic indications constitutes an independent factor of early discharge in a setting of ERAS. These promising preliminary results still require to be validated on a prospective cohort.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Enhanced recovery after surgery; Gynecologic oncology surgery; Predictors for post-operative discharge; Selection of eligible patient with a nomogram

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31309314     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-019-06974-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  40 in total

1.  Enhanced Recovery Pathways for Improving Outcomes After Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Oncology Surgery.

Authors:  Jocelyn S Chapman; Erika Roddy; Stefanie Ueda; Rebecca Brooks; Lee-Lynn Chen; Lee-May Chen
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 7.661

2.  Guidelines for perioperative care in gynecologic/oncology: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Society recommendations-2019 update.

Authors:  Gregg Nelson; Jamie Bakkum-Gamez; Eleftheria Kalogera; Gretchen Glaser; Alon Altman; Larissa A Meyer; Jolyn S Taylor; Maria Iniesta; Javier Lasala; Gabriel Mena; Michael Scott; Chelsia Gillis; Kevin Elias; Lena Wijk; Jeffrey Huang; Jonas Nygren; Olle Ljungqvist; Pedro T Ramirez; Sean C Dowdy
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2019-03-15       Impact factor: 3.437

Review 3.  Enhanced Recovery After Surgery for Advanced Ovarian Cancer: A Systematic Review of Interventions Trialed.

Authors:  Kristina Lindemann; Peey-Sei Kok; Martin Stockler; Ken Jaaback; Alison Brand
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 3.437

4.  Predicting the discharge status after liver transplantation at a single center: a new approach for a new era.

Authors:  Dympna M Kelly; Renee Bennett; Nancy Brown; Judy McCoy; Derek Boerner; Changhong Yu; Bijan Eghtesad; Wael Barsoum; John J Fung; Michael W Kattan
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 5.799

5.  Patients' perspectives of fast-track surgery and the role of the fast-track clinical nurse consultant in gynecological oncology.

Authors:  Shannon Philp; J Carter; C Barnett; N DʼAbrew; S Pather; K White
Journal:  Holist Nurs Pract       Date:  2015 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.000

6.  [Total laparoscopic hysterectomy and same-day discharge: Satisfaction evaluation and feasibility study].

Authors:  L Bruneau; M Randet; S Evrard; A Damon; F-X Laurent
Journal:  J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris)       Date:  2015-03-13

7.  Clinical outcomes after fast-track care in women undergoing laparoscopic hysterectomy.

Authors:  Lucas Minig; Linus Chuang; Maria Guadalupe Patrono; María Fernandez-Chereguini; Jose M Cárdenas-Rebollo; Roberto Biffi
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2015-09-08       Impact factor: 3.561

8.  Feasibility and economic impact of same-day discharge for women who undergo laparoscopic hysterectomy.

Authors:  Maria B Schiavone; Thomas J Herzog; Cande V Ananth; Elizabeth T Wilde; Sharyn N Lewin; William M Burke; Yu-Shiang Lu; Alfred I Neugut; Dawn L Hershman; Jason D Wright
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-09-17       Impact factor: 8.661

9.  Longer operative time is associated with increased post-operative complications in patients undergoing minimally-invasive surgery for endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Sareena Singh; Karen Swarer; Kimberly Resnick
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2017-10-02       Impact factor: 5.482

Review 10.  Nomograms for staging, prognosis, and predicting treatment outcomes.

Authors:  Karim Touijer; Peter T Scardino
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2009-07-01       Impact factor: 6.860

View more
  1 in total

1.  Choosing the most appropriate minimally invasive approach to treat gynecologic cancers in the context of an enhanced recovery program: Insights from a comprehensive cancer center.

Authors:  Antoine Netter; Camille Jauffret; Clément Brun; Laura Sabiani; Guillaume Blache; Gilles Houvenaeghel; Eric Lambaudie
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-04-23       Impact factor: 3.240

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.