Literature DB >> 31307659

Supine magnetic resonance defecography for evaluation of anterior compartment prolapse: Comparison with upright voiding cystourethrogram.

Neil M Kumar1, Gaurav Khatri2, Alana L Christie3, Robert Sims4, Ivan Pedrosa5, Philippe E Zimmern6.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare utility of supine Magnetic Resonance Defecography (MRD) with upright Voiding Cystourethrogram (VCUG) for evaluation of cystocele and urethral hypermobility (UHM).
METHODS: This was an IRB-approved, HIPAA-compliant, retrospective study of 51 consecutive patients with symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and lower urinary tract symptoms who underwent both upright VCUG and supine MRD. Cystocele height was defined in centimeters with reference to the inferior edge of the pubic bone on VCUG and the pubococcygeal line on MRD. Urethral angle at rest (UAR) and during straining (UAS) was measured in degrees between the urethral axis and a vertical line at the external meatus. Pairedt-test and simple linear regression were applied to compare VCUG and MRD data sets. p <  0.05 was considered significant.
RESULTS: The mean cystocele extent was 1.58 cm lower (more inferior to the reference point) (95% CI for the mean difference: 1.21, 1.94;p < 0.0001) on MRD (-2.73 ± 1.99 cm) than on VCUG (-1.16 ± 1.75 cm). Mean UAS on MRD (72.29 ± 26.45) was 31.8 degrees higher compared to that on VCUG (40.45 ± 21.41), (95% CI for mean difference in UAS: 37.57, 26.11; p < 0.0001). Mean UAS-UAR on MRD (74.30 ± 28.50) was 58.6 degrees higher compared to that on VCUG (15.70 ± 11.27) (95% CI for mean difference in UAS-UAR 65.94, 51.26; p < 0.0001). Cystocele size was upgraded in 22 (43.3%) patients on MRD compared to VCUG. Five (9.8%) patients demonstrated UHM on VCUG; 48 (94.1%) patients demonstrated UHM on MRD. The differences between VCUG and MRD scores persisted across the range of VCUG measurements. Cystocele size was significantly larger in POP (+) patients than in POP (-) patients on MRD (p =  0.005) but not on VCUG (p =  0.06).
CONCLUSIONS: Supine MRD demonstrates significantly higher prevalence and degree of cystocele and UHM than upright VCUG, and alters the grade of bladder prolapse in a significant portion of the patient population. Cystocele size on MRD correlates with clinical presence of prolapse symptoms.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cystocele; Magnetic resonance defecography; Pelvic organ prolapse; Supine MRI; Urethral hypermobility; Voiding cystourethrogram

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31307659     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2019.05.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Radiol        ISSN: 0720-048X            Impact factor:   3.528


  3 in total

Review 1.  Pelvic floor dysfunctions: how to image patients?

Authors:  Francesca Iacobellis; Alfonso Reginelli; Daniela Berritto; Giuliano Gagliardi; Antonietta Laporta; Antonio Brillantino; Adolfo Renzi; Mariano Scaglione; Gabriele Masselli; Antonio Barile; Luigia Romano; Salvatore Cappabianca; Roberto Grassi
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2019-12-16       Impact factor: 2.374

2.  Clinical applications of pelvic floor imaging: opinion statement endorsed by the society of abdominal radiology (SAR), American Urological Association (AUA), and American Urogynecologic Society (AUGS).

Authors:  Victoria Chernyak; Joshua Bleier; Mariya Kobi; Ian Paquette; Milana Flusberg; Philippe Zimmern; Larissa V Rodriguez; Phyllis Glanc; Suzanne Palmer; Luz Maria Rodriguez; Marsha K Guess; Milena M Weinstein; Roopa Ram; Kedar Jambhekar; Gaurav Khatri
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2021-03-27

3.  Consensus definitions and interpretation templates for magnetic resonance imaging of Defecatory pelvic floor disorders : Proceedings of the consensus meeting of the pelvic floor disorders consortium of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons, the Society of Abdominal Radiology, the international continence society, the American Urogynecologic Society, the international Urogynecological association, and the Society of Gynecologic Surgeons.

Authors:  Brooke H Gurland; Gaurav Khatri; Roopa Ram; Tracy L Hull; Ervin Kocjancic; Lieschen H Quiroz; Rania F El Sayed; Kedar R Jambhekar; Victoria Chernyak; Raj Mohan Paspulati; Vipul R Sheth; Ari M Steiner; Amita Kamath; S Abbas Shobeiri; Milena M Weinstein; Liliana Bordeianou
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2021-10       Impact factor: 2.894

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.