Chad Glisch1, Yuya Hagiwara1, Stephanie Gilbertson-White2, Yubo Gao3, Laurel Lyckholm4. 1. Department of Medicine, Supportive and Palliative Care Program, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA, USA. 2. College of Nursing, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA. 3. Department of Medicine, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA, USA. 4. Division of Hematology, Oncology, Blood and Marrow Transplantation, Department of Medicine, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitors have changed the landscape of cancer care by increasing progression-free and overall survival in some patients with cancer. We evaluated use and variables contributing to immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment near the end of life. METHODS: We studied 157 patients who received immune checkpoint inhibitors and died between January 2015 and December 2018. All patients had a palliative care consult any time between starting an immune checkpoint inhibitor and death. Univariate and multivariate models were used to examine variables related to immune checkpoint inhibitor use near the end of life. RESULTS: Among 157 patients studied, 42 (27%) received a dose of immune checkpoint inhibitor in the last 30 days of life. Those who received treatment in the last 30 days of life had lower hospice enrollment (19 [45%] vs 78 [69%], P = .007) and higher rates of dying in the hospital (23 [56%] vs 33 [29%], P = .002). The percentage of patients with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) ≥3 at the time of last immune checkpoint inhibitor dose was higher in the group that received immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment in the last 30 days of life (11 [26%] vs 9 [8%], P = .003). Lack of traditional chemotherapy after immune checkpoint inhibitor, ECOG ≥3, and lack of hospice enrollment were independently associated with receiving immune checkpoint inhibitor in the last 30 days of life. CONCLUSION: Immune checkpoint inhibitor use in the last 30 days of life is common and associated with poor performance status, lower hospice enrollment, and dying in the hospital.
BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitors have changed the landscape of cancer care by increasing progression-free and overall survival in some patients with cancer. We evaluated use and variables contributing to immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment near the end of life. METHODS: We studied 157 patients who received immune checkpoint inhibitors and died between January 2015 and December 2018. All patients had a palliative care consult any time between starting an immune checkpoint inhibitor and death. Univariate and multivariate models were used to examine variables related to immune checkpoint inhibitor use near the end of life. RESULTS: Among 157 patients studied, 42 (27%) received a dose of immune checkpoint inhibitor in the last 30 days of life. Those who received treatment in the last 30 days of life had lower hospice enrollment (19 [45%] vs 78 [69%], P = .007) and higher rates of dying in the hospital (23 [56%] vs 33 [29%], P = .002). The percentage of patients with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) ≥3 at the time of last immune checkpoint inhibitor dose was higher in the group that received immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment in the last 30 days of life (11 [26%] vs 9 [8%], P = .003). Lack of traditional chemotherapy after immune checkpoint inhibitor, ECOG ≥3, and lack of hospice enrollment were independently associated with receiving immune checkpoint inhibitor in the last 30 days of life. CONCLUSION: Immune checkpoint inhibitor use in the last 30 days of life is common and associated with poor performance status, lower hospice enrollment, and dying in the hospital.
Entities:
Keywords:
cancer; end of life; immune checkpoint inhibitor; immunotherapy; oncology; palliative care
Authors: Ravi B Parikh; Eun Jeong Min; E Paul Wileyto; Fauzia Riaz; Cary P Gross; Roger B Cohen; Rebecca A Hubbard; Qi Long; Ronac Mamtani Journal: JAMA Oncol Date: 2021-12-01 Impact factor: 31.777
Authors: Ali Raza Khaki; Ang Li; Leonidas N Diamantopoulos; Mehmet A Bilen; Victor Santos; John Esther; Rafael Morales-Barrera; Michael Devitt; Ariel Nelson; Christopher J Hoimes; Evan Shreck; Hussein Assi; Benjamin A Gartrell; Alex Sankin; Alejo Rodriguez-Vida; Mark Lythgoe; David J Pinato; Alexandra Drakaki; Monika Joshi; Pedro Isaacsson Velho; Noah Hahn; Sandy Liu; Lucia Alonso Buznego; Ignacio Duran; Marcus Moses; Jayanshu Jain; Jure Murgic; Praneeth Baratam; Pedro Barata; Abhishek Tripathi; Yousef Zakharia; Matthew D Galsky; Guru Sonpavde; Evan Y Yu; Veena Shankaran; Gary H Lyman; Petros Grivas Journal: Cancer Date: 2019-12-12 Impact factor: 6.921
Authors: Mathias Schlögl; Anand S Iyer; Florian Riese; David Blum; Lanier O'Hare; Tejaswini Kulkarni; Sophie Pautex; Jan Schildmann; Keith M Swetz; Pallavi Kumar; Christopher A Jones Journal: J Palliat Med Date: 2021-07-14 Impact factor: 2.947