Michael A Marchetti1, Konstantinos Liopyris2, Stephen W Dusza2, Noel C F Codella3, David A Gutman4, Brian Helba5, Aadi Kalloo2, Allan C Halpern2. 1. Dermatology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York. Electronic address: marchetm@mskcc.org. 2. Dermatology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York. 3. IBM Research Division, Thomas J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, New York. 4. Department of Neurology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia; Department of Psychiatry, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia; Department of Biomedical Informatics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia. 5. Kitware Inc, Clifton Park, New York.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Computer vision has promise in image-based cutaneous melanoma diagnosis but clinical utility is uncertain. OBJECTIVE: To determine if computer algorithms from an international melanoma detection challenge can improve dermatologists' accuracy in diagnosing melanoma. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, we used 150 dermoscopy images (50 melanomas, 50 nevi, 50 seborrheic keratoses) from the test dataset of a melanoma detection challenge, along with algorithm results from 23 teams. Eight dermatologists and 9 dermatology residents classified dermoscopic lesion images in an online reader study and provided their confidence level. RESULTS: The top-ranked computer algorithm had an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.87, which was higher than that of the dermatologists (0.74) and residents (0.66) (P < .001 for all comparisons). At the dermatologists' overall sensitivity in classification of 76.0%, the algorithm had a superior specificity (85.0% vs. 72.6%, P = .001). Imputation of computer algorithm classifications into dermatologist evaluations with low confidence ratings (26.6% of evaluations) increased dermatologist sensitivity from 76.0% to 80.8% and specificity from 72.6% to 72.8%. LIMITATIONS: Artificial study setting lacking the full spectrum of skin lesions as well as clinical metadata. CONCLUSION: Accumulating evidence suggests that deep neural networks can classify skin images of melanoma and its benign mimickers with high accuracy and potentially improve human performance.
BACKGROUND: Computer vision has promise in image-based cutaneous melanoma diagnosis but clinical utility is uncertain. OBJECTIVE: To determine if computer algorithms from an international melanoma detection challenge can improve dermatologists' accuracy in diagnosing melanoma. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, we used 150 dermoscopy images (50 melanomas, 50 nevi, 50 seborrheic keratoses) from the test dataset of a melanoma detection challenge, along with algorithm results from 23 teams. Eight dermatologists and 9 dermatology residents classified dermoscopic lesion images in an online reader study and provided their confidence level. RESULTS: The top-ranked computer algorithm had an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.87, which was higher than that of the dermatologists (0.74) and residents (0.66) (P < .001 for all comparisons). At the dermatologists' overall sensitivity in classification of 76.0%, the algorithm had a superior specificity (85.0% vs. 72.6%, P = .001). Imputation of computer algorithm classifications into dermatologist evaluations with low confidence ratings (26.6% of evaluations) increased dermatologist sensitivity from 76.0% to 80.8% and specificity from 72.6% to 72.8%. LIMITATIONS: Artificial study setting lacking the full spectrum of skin lesions as well as clinical metadata. CONCLUSION: Accumulating evidence suggests that deep neural networks can classify skin images of melanoma and its benign mimickers with high accuracy and potentially improve human performance.
Authors: H A Haenssle; C Fink; R Schneiderbauer; F Toberer; T Buhl; A Blum; A Kalloo; A Ben Hadj Hassen; L Thomas; A Enk; L Uhlmann Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2018-08-01 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: Andre Esteva; Brett Kuprel; Roberto A Novoa; Justin Ko; Susan M Swetter; Helen M Blau; Sebastian Thrun Journal: Nature Date: 2017-01-25 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Gary Monheit; Armand B Cognetta; Laura Ferris; Harold Rabinovitz; Kenneth Gross; Mary Martini; James M Grichnik; Martin Mihm; Victor G Prieto; Paul Googe; Roy King; Alicia Toledano; Nikolai Kabelev; Maciej Wojton; Dina Gutkowicz-Krusin Journal: Arch Dermatol Date: 2010-10-18
Authors: Philipp Tschandl; Cliff Rosendahl; Bengu Nisa Akay; Giuseppe Argenziano; Andreas Blum; Ralph P Braun; Horacio Cabo; Jean-Yves Gourhant; Jürgen Kreusch; Aimilios Lallas; Jan Lapins; Ashfaq Marghoob; Scott Menzies; Nina Maria Neuber; John Paoli; Harold S Rabinovitz; Christoph Rinner; Alon Scope; H Peter Soyer; Christoph Sinz; Luc Thomas; Iris Zalaudek; Harald Kittler Journal: JAMA Dermatol Date: 2019-01-01 Impact factor: 10.282
Authors: Cristian Navarrete-Dechent; Stephen W Dusza; Konstantinos Liopyris; Ashfaq A Marghoob; Allan C Halpern; Michael A Marchetti Journal: J Invest Dermatol Date: 2018-06-01 Impact factor: 8.551
Authors: Michael A Marchetti; Noel C F Codella; Stephen W Dusza; David A Gutman; Brian Helba; Aadi Kalloo; Nabin Mishra; Cristina Carrera; M Emre Celebi; Jennifer L DeFazio; Natalia Jaimes; Ashfaq A Marghoob; Elizabeth Quigley; Alon Scope; Oriol Yélamos; Allan C Halpern Journal: J Am Acad Dermatol Date: 2017-09-29 Impact factor: 11.527
Authors: Michael A Marchetti; Ashley Yu; Japbani Nanda; Philipp Tschandl; Harald Kittler; Ashfaq A Marghoob; Allan C Halpern; Stephen W Dusza Journal: J Am Acad Dermatol Date: 2020-04-29 Impact factor: 11.527
Authors: Isaac S Chua; Michal Gaziel-Yablowitz; Zfania T Korach; Kenneth L Kehl; Nathan A Levitan; Yull E Arriaga; Gretchen P Jackson; David W Bates; Michael Hassett Journal: Cancer Med Date: 2021-05-07 Impact factor: 4.452
Authors: Marc Combalia; Noel Codella; Veronica Rotemberg; Cristina Carrera; Stephen Dusza; David Gutman; Brian Helba; Harald Kittler; Nicholas R Kurtansky; Konstantinos Liopyris; Michael A Marchetti; Sebastian Podlipnik; Susana Puig; Christoph Rinner; Philipp Tschandl; Jochen Weber; Allan Halpern; Josep Malvehy Journal: Lancet Digit Health Date: 2022-05
Authors: Gabriella Liszkay; Zoltan Kiss; Roland Gyulai; Judit Oláh; Péter Holló; Gabriella Emri; András Csejtei; István Kenessey; Angela Benedek; Zoltán Polányi; Zsófia Nagy-Erdei; Andrea Daniel; Kata Knollmajer; Máté Várnai; Zoltán Vokó; Balázs Nagy; György Rokszin; Ibolya Fábián; Zsófia Barcza; Csaba Polgár Journal: Front Oncol Date: 2021-02-12 Impact factor: 6.244
Authors: Titus J Brinker; Roman C Maron; Jochen S Utikal; Achim Hekler; Axel Hauschild; Elke Sattler; Wiebke Sondermann; Sebastian Haferkamp; Bastian Schilling; Markus V Heppt; Philipp Jansen; Markus Reinholz; Cindy Franklin; Laurenz Schmitt; Daniela Hartmann; Eva Krieghoff-Henning; Max Schmitt; Michael Weichenthal; Christof von Kalle; Stefan Fröhling Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2020-09-11 Impact factor: 5.428