Literature DB >> 31306609

Motor-Induced Suppression of the N100 Event-Related Potential During Motor Imagery Control of a Speech Synthesizer Brain-Computer Interface.

Jonathan S Brumberg1, Kevin M Pitt1.   

Abstract

Purpose Speech motor control relies on neural processes for generating sensory expectations using an efference copy mechanism to maintain accurate productions. The N100 auditory event-related potential (ERP) has been identified as a possible neural marker of the efference copy with a reduced amplitude during active listening while speaking when compared to passive listening. This study investigates N100 suppression while controlling a motor imagery speech synthesizer brain-computer interface (BCI) with instantaneous auditory feedback to determine whether similar mechanisms are used for monitoring BCI-based speech output that may both support BCI learning through existing speech motor networks and be used as a clinical marker for the speech network integrity in individuals without severe speech and physical impairments. Method The motor-induced N100 suppression is examined based on data from 10 participants who controlled a BCI speech synthesizer using limb motor imagery. We considered listening to auditory target stimuli (without motor imagery) in the BCI study as passive listening and listening to BCI-controlled speech output (with motor imagery) as active listening since audio output depends on imagined movements. The resulting ERP was assessed for statistical significance using a mixed-effects general linear model. Results Statistically significant N100 ERP amplitude differences were observed between active and passive listening during the BCI task. Post hoc analyses confirm the N100 amplitude was suppressed during active listening. Conclusion Observation of the N100 suppression suggests motor planning brain networks are active as participants control the BCI synthesizer, which may aid speech BCI mastery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31306609      PMCID: PMC6808362          DOI: 10.1044/2019_JSLHR-S-MSC18-18-0198

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res        ISSN: 1092-4388            Impact factor:   2.297


  30 in total

1.  Vocal responses to unanticipated perturbations in voice loudness feedback: an automatic mechanism for stabilizing voice amplitude.

Authors:  Jay J Bauer; Jay Mittal; Charles R Larson; Timothy C Hain
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Single-trial classification of vowel speech imagery using common spatial patterns.

Authors:  Charles S DaSalla; Hiroyuki Kambara; Makoto Sato; Yasuharu Koike
Journal:  Neural Netw       Date:  2009-05-22

3.  What does motor efference copy represent? Evidence from speech production.

Authors:  Caroline A Niziolek; Srikantan S Nagarajan; John F Houde
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-10-09       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  The integration of large-scale neural network modeling and functional brain imaging in speech motor control.

Authors:  E Golfinopoulos; J A Tourville; F H Guenther
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2009-10-23       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Single-trial speech suppression of auditory cortex activity in humans.

Authors:  Adeen Flinker; Edward F Chang; Heidi E Kirsch; Nicholas M Barbaro; Nathan E Crone; Robert T Knight
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-12-08       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  The influence of psychological state and motivation on brain-computer interface performance in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis - a longitudinal study.

Authors:  Femke Nijboer; Niels Birbaumer; Andrea Kübler
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2010-07-21       Impact factor: 4.677

7.  Vowel category boundaries enhance cortical and behavioral responses to speech feedback alterations.

Authors:  Caroline A Niziolek; Frank H Guenther
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-07-17       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Direct classification of all American English phonemes using signals from functional speech motor cortex.

Authors:  Emily M Mugler; James L Patton; Robert D Flint; Zachary A Wright; Stephan U Schuele; Joshua Rosenow; Jerry J Shih; Dean J Krusienski; Marc W Slutzky
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2014-05-19       Impact factor: 5.379

9.  Vocalization-induced enhancement of the auditory cortex responsiveness during voice F0 feedback perturbation.

Authors:  Roozbeh Behroozmand; Laura Karvelis; Hanjun Liu; Charles R Larson
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-06-10       Impact factor: 3.708

10.  Speech production as state feedback control.

Authors:  John F Houde; Srikantan S Nagarajan
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2011-10-25       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  1 in total

1.  Behind the Scenes of Noninvasive Brain-Computer Interfaces: A Review of Electroencephalography Signals, How They Are Recorded, and Why They Matter.

Authors:  Kevin M Pitt; Jonathan S Brumberg; Jeremy D Burnison; Jyutika Mehta; Juhi Kidwai
Journal:  Perspect ASHA Spec Interest Groups       Date:  2019-11-09
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.