OBJECTIVE: Although brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) can be used in several different ways to restore communication, communicative BCI has not approached the rate or efficiency of natural human speech. Electrocorticography (ECoG) has precise spatiotemporal resolution that enables recording of brain activity distributed over a wide area of cortex, such as during speech production. In this study, we sought to decode elements of speech production using ECoG. APPROACH: We investigated words that contain the entire set of phonemes in the general American accent using ECoG with four subjects. Using a linear classifier, we evaluated the degree to which individual phonemes within each word could be correctly identified from cortical signal. MAIN RESULTS: We classified phonemes with up to 36% accuracy when classifying all phonemes and up to 63% accuracy for a single phoneme. Further, misclassified phonemes follow articulation organization described in phonology literature, aiding classification of whole words. Precise temporal alignment to phoneme onset was crucial for classification success. SIGNIFICANCE: We identified specific spatiotemporal features that aid classification, which could guide future applications. Word identification was equivalent to information transfer rates as high as 3.0 bits s(-1) (33.6 words min(-1)), supporting pursuit of speech articulation for BCI control.
OBJECTIVE: Although brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) can be used in several different ways to restore communication, communicative BCI has not approached the rate or efficiency of natural human speech. Electrocorticography (ECoG) has precise spatiotemporal resolution that enables recording of brain activity distributed over a wide area of cortex, such as during speech production. In this study, we sought to decode elements of speech production using ECoG. APPROACH: We investigated words that contain the entire set of phonemes in the general American accent using ECoG with four subjects. Using a linear classifier, we evaluated the degree to which individual phonemes within each word could be correctly identified from cortical signal. MAIN RESULTS: We classified phonemes with up to 36% accuracy when classifying all phonemes and up to 63% accuracy for a single phoneme. Further, misclassified phonemes follow articulation organization described in phonology literature, aiding classification of whole words. Precise temporal alignment to phoneme onset was crucial for classification success. SIGNIFICANCE: We identified specific spatiotemporal features that aid classification, which could guide future applications. Word identification was equivalent to information transfer rates as high as 3.0 bits s(-1) (33.6 words min(-1)), supporting pursuit of speech articulation for BCI control.
Authors: Jonathan R Wolpaw; Niels Birbaumer; Dennis J McFarland; Gert Pfurtscheller; Theresa M Vaughan Journal: Clin Neurophysiol Date: 2002-06 Impact factor: 3.708
Authors: Kai J Miller; Adam O Hebb; Dora Hermes; Marcel den Nijs; Jeffrey G Ojemann; Rajesh N P Rao Journal: Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc Date: 2010
Authors: Eric C Leuthardt; Charles Gaona; Mohit Sharma; Nicholas Szrama; Jarod Roland; Zac Freudenberg; Jamie Solis; Jonathan Breshears; Gerwin Schalk Journal: J Neural Eng Date: 2011-04-07 Impact factor: 5.379
Authors: Jeremy R Manning; Michael R Sperling; Ashwini Sharan; Emily A Rosenberg; Michael J Kahana Journal: J Neurosci Date: 2012-06-27 Impact factor: 6.167
Authors: Xiaomei Pei; Eric C Leuthardt; Charles M Gaona; Peter Brunner; Jonathan R Wolpaw; Gerwin Schalk Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2010-10-26 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Frank H Guenther; Jonathan S Brumberg; E Joseph Wright; Alfonso Nieto-Castanon; Jason A Tourville; Mikhail Panko; Robert Law; Steven A Siebert; Jess L Bartels; Dinal S Andreasen; Princewill Ehirim; Hui Mao; Philip R Kennedy Journal: PLoS One Date: 2009-12-09 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Miguel Angrick; Christian Herff; Emily Mugler; Matthew C Tate; Marc W Slutzky; Dean J Krusienski; Tanja Schultz Journal: J Neural Eng Date: 2019-03-04 Impact factor: 5.379
Authors: Jane E Huggins; Christoph Guger; Erik Aarnoutse; Brendan Allison; Charles W Anderson; Steven Bedrick; Walter Besio; Ricardo Chavarriaga; Jennifer L Collinger; An H Do; Christian Herff; Matthias Hohmann; Michelle Kinsella; Kyuhwa Lee; Fabien Lotte; Gernot Müller-Putz; Anton Nijholt; Elmar Pels; Betts Peters; Felix Putze; Rüdiger Rupp; Gerwin Schalk; Stephanie Scott; Michael Tangermann; Paul Tubig; Thorsten Zander Journal: Brain Comput Interfaces (Abingdon) Date: 2019-12-10
Authors: Jonathan S Brumberg; Kevin M Pitt; Alana Mantie-Kozlowski; Jeremy D Burnison Journal: Am J Speech Lang Pathol Date: 2018-02-06 Impact factor: 2.408
Authors: Anna Chrabaszcz; Wolf-Julian Neumann; Otilia Stretcu; Witold J Lipski; Alan Bush; Christina A Dastolfo-Hromack; Dengyu Wang; Donald J Crammond; Susan Shaiman; Michael W Dickey; Lori L Holt; Robert S Turner; Julie A Fiez; R Mark Richardson Journal: J Neurosci Date: 2019-01-30 Impact factor: 6.167