| Literature DB >> 31305907 |
Celeste Alexander1,2, Kelly S Swanson1,3, George C Fahey1,3, Keith A Garleb3,2.
Abstract
In recent years, it has become increasingly obvious that dietary fiber or nondigestible carbohydrate (NDC) consumption is critical for maintaining optimal health and managing symptoms of metabolic disease. In accordance with this, the US FDA released its first official definition of dietary fiber in 2016 for regulation of Nutrition and Supplement Facts labels. Included in this definition is the requirement of an isolated or synthetic NDC to produce an accepted physiologic health benefit, such as improved laxation or reduced fasting cholesterol concentrations, upon consumption. Even though NDC fermentation and production of short-chain fatty acids elicit many physiologic effects, including serving as a source of energy for colonocytes, curbing glycemic response and satiety, promoting weight loss, enhancing mineral absorption, reducing systemic inflammation, and improving intestinal health, the process of fermentation is not considered a physiologic endpoint. Instead, expensive and laborious clinical trials must be conducted and an accepted physiologic benefit observed. In this review, we discuss the physiologic importance of NDC fermentation through extensive examination of clinical evidence and propose that the degree of fermentability of an NDC, rather than the endpoints of a clinical trial, may be appropriate for classifying it as a dietary fiber.Entities:
Keywords: dietary fiber; fermentation; gastrointestinal health; mineral absorption; short-chain fatty acids
Year: 2019 PMID: 31305907 PMCID: PMC6628845 DOI: 10.1093/advances/nmz004
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Adv Nutr ISSN: 2161-8313 Impact factor: 8.701
In vitro fermentation profiles of NDCs obtained with the use of human fecal inoculum[1]
| NDC | Product/substrate | Ac:Pr:Bu (% total SCFA) | Total SCFA (mmol/g NDC) | Time (h) | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arabinoxylan | Wheat bran, Now Foods | 60:33:07 | 4.94 | 8 | Rumpagaporn et al. 2015 ( |
| Corn bran, Bunge Milling | 75:17:08 | 7.51 | 8 | Rumpagaporn et al. 2015 ( | |
| AXOS (wheat) | 278 kDa, Megazyme | 67:13:20 | 6.14 | 12 | Hughes et al. 2007 ( |
| COS (low molecular wt) | 50–190 kDa, Aldrich | 72:21:07 | N/A | 24 | Vernazza et al. 2005 ( |
| FOS (short chain) | NutraFlora, Ingredion | 53:16:31 | 6.71 | 8 | Hernot et al. 2009 ( |
| FOS (medium chain) | Beneo P95 | 55:14:31 | 6.91 | 8 | Hernot et al. 2009 ( |
| Beneo HP | 58:14:28 | 6.46 | 24 | Kaur et al. 2011 ( | |
| GOS | Vivinal GOS, Friesland Campina Domo | 59:15:26 | 7.15 | 8 | Hernot et al. 2009 ( |
| Guar gum | Sigma | 53:33:14 | 6.85 | 24 | Bourquin et al. 1996 ( |
| PHGG | Taiyo Kagaku Co Ltd | 27:59:14 | NA | 8 | Noack et al. 2013 ( |
| BeneFibra, GSK | 35:27:38 | NA | 8 | Carlson et al. 2015 ( | |
| Inulin | Oliggo-Fiber, Cargill | 39:51:10 | NA | 8 | Noack et al. 2013 ( |
| Oliggo-Fiber, Cargill | 47:14:39 | 4.82 | 8 | Hernot et al. 2009 ( | |
| Beneo ST | 44:13:43 | 5.91 | 8 | Hernot et al. 2009 ( | |
| Beneo HP | 48:14:38 | 4.64 | 8 | Hernot et al. 2009 ( | |
| Beneo HP | 58:14:28 | 3.2 | 24 | Kaur et al. 2011 ( | |
| Inulin (FOS-enriched) | Beneo Synergy 1 | 45:14:41 | 6.16 | 8 | Hernot et al. 2009 ( |
| Pectin | Sigma | 74:09:17 | 7.97 | 12 | Campbell et al. 1997 ( |
| Polydextrose | STA-LITE, Tate & Lyle | 69:18:13 | 4.73 | 8 | Hernot et al. 2009 ( |
| Psyllium husk | Psyllium husk, P&G | 56:32:12 | 0.76 | 12 | Campbell et al. 1997 ( |
| Soluble corn fiber | Promitor, Tate & Lyle | 60:17:23 | NA | 72 | Maathuis et al. 2009 ( |
| Wheat dextrin | BeneFiber, GSK | 34:52:14 | NA | 8 | Noack et al. 2013 ( |
| BeneFiber, GSK | 33:33:34 | NA | 8 | Carlson et al. 2015 ( |
1Ac, acetate; AXOS, arabinoxylanoligosaccharide; Bu, butyrate; COS, chitosanoligosaccharide; FOS, fructooligosaccharide; GOS, galactooligosaccharide; NA, not available; NDC, nondigestible carbohydrate; PHGG, partially hydrolyzed guar gum; Pr, propionate.
Summary of key findings[1]
| Glycemic control, satiety, and weight loss | |
| Subjects with impaired glucose homeostasis | Improved insulin resistance/sensitivity, decreased postprandial glucose elevation, reduced HbA1c |
| Overweight or obese subjects without impaired glucose homeostasis | Increased satiety and reduced energy intake with accompanied weight loss |
| Healthy subjects | Increased satiety and postprandial GLP-1 concentrations |
| Mineral absorption and balance | |
| Postmenopausal women | Reduced decline in bone mineral density, slowed rate of total bone loss, and increased Ca and Mg absorption, bone formation, bone Ca retention, and bone Ca balance |
| Children and adolescents | Increased absorption of Fe, Ca, and Mg |
| Healthy subjects | Increased Ca and Mg absorption, increased Mg retention, increased heme Fe bioavailability |
| Gut health and inflammation | |
| Inflammatory bowel disease | Improved DAI and histologic scores, prolonged remission, decreased stool frequency, reduced proportion and activation of GI-resident inflammatory cells, reduced circulating inflammatory marker concentrations |
| Metabolic dysfunction | Weight loss, reduced circulating inflammatory and oxidative stress marker concentrations, reduced immune-cell infiltration in the GI tract |
| Healthy subjects | Decreased fecal ammonia concentrations, decreased β-glucuronidase activity, improved measures of GI permeability, reduced circulating inflammatory marker concentrations, decreased protein fermentation |
1DAI, disease activity index; GI, gastrointestinal; GLP-1, glucagon-like peptide 1; HbA1c, glycated hemoglobin.