Nicholas Lintzeris1,2, Anjali Bhardwaj1,2, Llewellyn Mills1,2, Adrian Dunlop3,4, Jan Copeland5, Iain McGregor6, Raimondo Bruno7, Jessica Gugusheff1,2, Nghi Phung8, Mark Montebello1, Therese Chan1, Adrienne Kirby9, Michelle Hall3, Meryem Jefferies8, Jennifer Luksza8, Marian Shanahan10, Richard Kevin3, David Allsop6. 1. Drug and Alcohol Services, South East Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia. 2. Discipline Addiction Medicine, Faculty Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia. 3. Drug and Alcohol Services, Hunter New England Local Health District, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia. 4. Priority Research Centre for Brain and Mental Health, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia. 5. National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia. 6. Lambert Initiative Cannabinoid Therapeutics, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia. 7. School of Psychology, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia. 8. Drug Health, Western Sydney Local Health District, Parramatta, New South Wales, Australia. 9. National Health and Medical Research Council, Clinical Trials Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia. 10. National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Abstract
IMPORTANCE: There are no effective medications for treating dependence on cannabis. OBJECTIVE: To examine the safety and efficacy of nabiximols in the treatment of patients with cannabis dependence. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This parallel double-blind randomized clinical trial comparing nabiximols with placebo in a 12-week, multisite outpatient study recruited participants from February 3, 2016, to June 14, 2017, at 4 outpatient specialist alcohol and drug treatment services in New South Wales, Australia. Participants had cannabis dependence (as defined by the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision) and were seeking treatment, were nonresponsive to prior treatment attempts, were 18 to 64 years of age, had no other substance use disorder, had no severe medical or psychiatric conditions, were not pregnant, were not mandated by a court to undergo treatment, and provided informed consent. Results for primary efficacy measures and all secondary outcomes were obtained using a modified intention-to-treat data set. INTERVENTIONS: Participants received 12-week treatment involving weekly clinical reviews, structured counseling, and flexible medication doses-up to 32 sprays daily (tetrahydrocannabinol, 86.4 mg, and cannabidiol, 80 mg), dispensed weekly. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Primary outcome was self-reported number of days using illicit cannabis during the 12-week period. Other outcomes included alternate cannabis use parameters (periods of abstinence, withdrawal, cravings, and problems), safety parameters (adverse events and aberrant medication use), health status, other substance use, and treatment retention. RESULTS: A total of 128 participants (30 women and 98 men; mean [SD] age, 35.0 [10.9] years) were randomized and received at least 1 dose of study medication. Participants had used a mean (SD) of 2.3 (2.1) g of cannabis on a mean (SD) of 25.7 (4.5) days in the past 28 days. Treatment retention was comparable for the 2 groups (placebo, 30 of 67 participants [44.8%]; nabiximols, 30 of 61 participants [49.2%]), and both groups used similar mean (SD) doses (placebo, 18.5 [9.5] sprays daily; nabiximols, 17.6 [9.5] sprays daily, equivalent to a mean [SD] of 47.5 [25.7] mg of tetrahydrocannabinol and 44.0 [23.8] mg of cannabidiol). For the primary end point, the placebo group reported significantly more days using cannabis during the 12 weeks (mean [SD], 53.1 [33.0] days) than the nabiximols group (mean [SD], 35.0 [32.4] days; estimated difference, 18.6 days; 95% CI, 3.5-33.7 days; P = .02). Both groups showed comparable improvements in health status, with no substantial changes in other substance use. Medication was well tolerated with few adverse events. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This study demonstrates that cannabinoid agonist treatment, in this case using nabiximols, in combination with psychosocial interventions is a safe approach for reducing cannabis use among individuals with cannabis dependence who are seeking treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: anzctr.org.au Identifier: ACTRN12616000103460.
IMPORTANCE: There are no effective medications for treating dependence on cannabis. OBJECTIVE: To examine the safety and efficacy of nabiximols in the treatment of patients with cannabis dependence. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This parallel double-blind randomized clinical trial comparing nabiximols with placebo in a 12-week, multisite outpatient study recruited participants from February 3, 2016, to June 14, 2017, at 4 outpatient specialist alcohol and drug treatment services in New South Wales, Australia. Participants had cannabis dependence (as defined by the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision) and were seeking treatment, were nonresponsive to prior treatment attempts, were 18 to 64 years of age, had no other substance use disorder, had no severe medical or psychiatric conditions, were not pregnant, were not mandated by a court to undergo treatment, and provided informed consent. Results for primary efficacy measures and all secondary outcomes were obtained using a modified intention-to-treat data set. INTERVENTIONS: Participants received 12-week treatment involving weekly clinical reviews, structured counseling, and flexible medication doses-up to 32 sprays daily (tetrahydrocannabinol, 86.4 mg, and cannabidiol, 80 mg), dispensed weekly. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Primary outcome was self-reported number of days using illicit cannabis during the 12-week period. Other outcomes included alternate cannabis use parameters (periods of abstinence, withdrawal, cravings, and problems), safety parameters (adverse events and aberrant medication use), health status, other substance use, and treatment retention. RESULTS: A total of 128 participants (30 women and 98 men; mean [SD] age, 35.0 [10.9] years) were randomized and received at least 1 dose of study medication. Participants had used a mean (SD) of 2.3 (2.1) g of cannabis on a mean (SD) of 25.7 (4.5) days in the past 28 days. Treatment retention was comparable for the 2 groups (placebo, 30 of 67 participants [44.8%]; nabiximols, 30 of 61 participants [49.2%]), and both groups used similar mean (SD) doses (placebo, 18.5 [9.5] sprays daily; nabiximols, 17.6 [9.5] sprays daily, equivalent to a mean [SD] of 47.5 [25.7] mg of tetrahydrocannabinol and 44.0 [23.8] mg of cannabidiol). For the primary end point, the placebo group reported significantly more days using cannabis during the 12 weeks (mean [SD], 53.1 [33.0] days) than the nabiximols group (mean [SD], 35.0 [32.4] days; estimated difference, 18.6 days; 95% CI, 3.5-33.7 days; P = .02). Both groups showed comparable improvements in health status, with no substantial changes in other substance use. Medication was well tolerated with few adverse events. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This study demonstrates that cannabinoid agonist treatment, in this case using nabiximols, in combination with psychosocial interventions is a safe approach for reducing cannabis use among individuals with cannabis dependence who are seeking treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: anzctr.org.au Identifier: ACTRN12616000103460.
Authors: Philip G Tibbo; Kyle A McKee; Jeffrey H Meyer; Candice E Crocker; Katherine J Aitchison; Raymond W Lam; David N Crockford Journal: Can J Psychiatry Date: 2020-09-11 Impact factor: 4.356
Authors: Margaret Haney; Gillinder Bedi; Ziva D Cooper; Evan S Herrmann; Stephanie Collins Reed; Richard W Foltin; Philip J Kingsley; Lawrence J Marnett; Sachin Patel Journal: Addict Biol Date: 2022-07 Impact factor: 4.093
Authors: Tom P Freeman; Chandni Hindocha; Gianluca Baio; Natacha D C Shaban; Emily M Thomas; Danica Astbury; Abigail M Freeman; Rachel Lees; Sam Craft; Paul D Morrison; Michael A P Bloomfield; Dominic O'Ryan; Jane Kinghorn; Celia J A Morgan; Ali Mofeez; H Valerie Curran Journal: Lancet Psychiatry Date: 2020-07-28 Impact factor: 27.083
Authors: Dennis J Sholler; Marilyn A Huestis; Benjamin Amendolara; Ryan Vandrey; Ziva D Cooper Journal: Pharmacol Biochem Behav Date: 2020-10-18 Impact factor: 3.533
Authors: Frances R Levin; John J Mariani; C Jean Choi; Cale Basaraba; Daniel J Brooks; Christina A Brezing; Martina Pavlicova Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2021-05-21 Impact factor: 4.852
Authors: Francisco Navarrete; María Salud García-Gutiérrez; Ani Gasparyan; Amaya Austrich-Olivares; Jorge Manzanares Journal: Front Pharmacol Date: 2021-05-20 Impact factor: 5.810
Authors: Brian J Sherman; Michael J Sofis; Jacob T Borodovsky; Kevin M Gray; Aimee L McRae-Clark; Alan J Budney Journal: Psychol Addict Behav Date: 2021-07-01