| Literature DB >> 31304046 |
Chengde Gao1, Meng Yao1, Sheng Li1, Pei Feng1, Shuping Peng2,3, Cijun Shuai1,4,5.
Abstract
Iron (Entities:
Keywords: Bioactivity; Biodegradability; Bredigite; Iron-based biocomposites; Palladium; Selective laser melting
Year: 2019 PMID: 31304046 PMCID: PMC6603336 DOI: 10.1016/j.jare.2019.06.001
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Adv Res ISSN: 2090-1224 Impact factor: 10.479
The composition of iron (Fe)-palladium (Pd)-bredigite biocomposites.
| Formulation | Composition (wt.%) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Fe | Pd | Bredigite | |
| Fe-2Pd-2.5bredigite | 95.5 | 2 | 2.5 |
| Fe-2Pd-5bredigite | 93 | 2 | 5 |
| Fe-2Pd-10bredigite | 88 | 2 | 10 |
| Fe-4Pd-2.5bredigite | 93.5 | 4 | 2.5 |
| Fe-4Pd-5bredigite | 91 | 4 | 5 |
| Fe-4Pd-10bredigite | 86 | 4 | 10 |
Fig. 1(a1–d1) Scanning electron microscope (SEM) morphology, (a2–c2) particle size distribution and (d2, a3–d3) element composition of the iron (Fe), palladium (Pd), bredigite and mixed powders. (e) Typical surface profile of the original Fe-Pd-bredigite biocomposites prepared by SLM.
Fig. 2Metallographs and corresponding grain size distribution of the prepared Fe-Pd-bredigite biocomposites.
Fig. 3(a) Surface morphology and corresponding element composition of Fe-4Pd-5bredigite biocomposite; (b) X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of Fe and Fe-4Pd-5bredigite biocomposite after laser melting, as well as the raw powders.
Fig. 4(a) Potentiodynamic polarization curves, (b) corresponding corrosion potentials (E), (c) corrosion current densities (I) and (d) degradation rates of Fe-Pd-bredigite biocomposites by electrochemical tests (*P < 0.05; **P < 0.01).
Fig. 5Degradation morphology and corresponding element composition in the corrosion products of Fe-Pd-bredigite biocomposites after immersion tests for 21 d.
Fig. 6Three dimensional (3D) surface profile of Fe-Pd-bredigite biocomposites after immersion tests for 21 d and product removal. The height-length graphs represent the height changes along the gray cross-sections.
Fig. 7(a) Compressive yield strength (CYS) and (b) microhardness of Fe-Pd-bredigite biocomposites. The insets represent the SEM morphology of the indentations after microhardness tests (*P < 0.05).
Fig. 8Fluorescent images of human osteoblast-like cells (MG-63) after 5 d of culture in the extracts, as well as the cells cultured in Dulbecco's modified eagle medium (DMEM) as a control. The live cells are stained green and the dead cells are stained red. (For interpretation of the references to color in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)
Fig. 9Cell viabilities of MG-63 cells after 3 and 5 d of culture in the Fe-Pd-bredigite extracts which are expressed as a percentage of that in the control group (*P < 0.05; ***P < 0.001).
Fig. 10Schematic of the degradation process of Fe-Pd-bredigite biocomposites: (a) galvanic corrosion between Pd-rich intermetallic phases (IMPs) and the Fe matrix, as well as bredigite degradation; (b) hydroxide formation and apatite deposition on the surface; (c) simulated body fluid (SBF) invasion via the corrosion pits resulting from bredigite degradation; (d) exposure of fresh Fe matrix to the SBF, followed by a continuous degradation.