Literature DB >> 30948118

Characterizations and interfacial reinforcement mechanisms of multicomponent biopolymer based scaffold.

Pei Feng1, Jiyao He1, Shuping Peng2, Chengde Gao1, Zhenyu Zhao3, Shixian Xiong4, Cijun Shuai5.   

Abstract

It is difficult for a single component biopolymer to meet the requirements of scaffold at present. The development of multicomponent biopolymer based scaffold provides an effective method to solve the issue based on the advantages of each kind of the biomaterials. However, the compatibility between different components might be very poor due to the difficulties in forming strong interfacial bonding, and thereby significantly degrading the integrated mechanical properties of the scaffold. In recent years, interface phase introduction, surface modification and in situ growth have been the major strategies for enhancing interfacial bonding. This article presents a comprehensive overview on the research in the area of constructing multicomponent biopolymer based scaffold and reinforcing their interfacial properties, and more importantly, the interfacial bonding mechanisms are systematically summarized. Detailly, interface phase introduction can build a bridge between biopolymer and other components to form strong interface bonding with the two phases under the action of interface phase. Surface modification can graft organic molecules or polymers containing functional groups onto other components to crosslink with biopolymer. In situ growth can directly in situ synthesize other components with the action of nucleating agent serving as an adherent platform for the nucleation and growth of other components to biopolymer surface by chemical bonding. In addition, the mechanical properties (including strength and modulus) and biological properties (including bioactivity, cytocompatibility and biosensing in vitro, and tissue compatibility, bone regeneration capacity in vivo) of multicomponent biopolymer based scaffold after interfacial reinforcing are also reviewed and discussed. Finally, suggestions for further research are given with highlighting the need for specific investigations to assess the interface formation, structure, properties, and more in vivo studies of scaffold before applications.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30948118     DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2019.03.030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl        ISSN: 0928-4931            Impact factor:   7.328


  5 in total

1.  A continuous net-like eutectic structure enhances the corrosion resistance of Mg alloys.

Authors:  Cijun Shuai; Wenjing Yang; Youwen Yang; Chengde Gao; Chongxian He; Hao Pan
Journal:  Int J Bioprint       Date:  2019-07-01

2.  The effect of different surface treatment methods on the physical, chemical and biological performances of a PGA scaffold.

Authors:  Yimin Song; Minghua Ren; Yadong Wu; Siyu Li; Chun Song; Fang Wang; Yudong Huang
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2019-06-28       Impact factor: 4.036

3.  Synthesis of Biocompatible Composite Material Based on Cryogels of Polyvinyl Alcohol and Calcium Phosphates.

Authors:  Rustam Sadykov; Daria Lytkina; Ksenia Stepanova; Irina Kurzina
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-21       Impact factor: 4.967

4.  Synthesis of Antibacterial Hybrid Hydroxyapatite/Collagen/Polysaccharide Bioactive Membranes and Their Effect on Osteoblast Culture.

Authors:  Lucas Fabrício Bahia Nogueira; Marcos Antônio Eufrásio Cruz; Guilherme José Aguilar; Delia Rita Tapia-Blácido; Márcia Eliana da Silva Ferreira; Bianca Chieregato Maniglia; Massimo Bottini; Pietro Ciancaglini; Ana Paula Ramos
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 6.208

Review 5.  Biodegradable materials for bone defect repair.

Authors:  Shuai Wei; Jian-Xiong Ma; Lai Xu; Xiao-Song Gu; Xin-Long Ma
Journal:  Mil Med Res       Date:  2020-11-10
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.